
Your recent editing history atRat shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Hell in a Bucket (talk)14:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk)15:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]A reminder that the burden of convincing editors of making changes falls squarely on the editor proposing the change. In other words, it’s not up to anyone here to convince you, it’s up toyou to convince everyone else. --Calton |Talk09:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]