Welcome!

Hello, Livius Plinius, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -Eagle^talk20:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Postcardfirstmerit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.11:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:Akron YMCA.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have animage tag applied to theimage description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message atWikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Your upload ofFile:Akron YMCA.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructionshere. Thanks!Message delivered byTheo's Little Bot (opt-out)11:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based onreliable sources and the projectpolicies and guidelines; they arenot for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visitingour reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See thetalk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.Acroterion(talk)17:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The objectivity of an article is directly related to its quality.

You are raising an overly pedantic objection to how someone phrased their objection to the lack of neutrality within the article on the Talk page.Livius Plinius (talk)17:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two people reverted you, a third has warned you. Your response ignores what you’ve been told about our policies and guidelines.Doug Wellertalk17:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not directly addressing why the content in question has nothing to do with the quality of the article. It was directly about whether the article has a neutral POV.

You are now adopting an ominous and harassing tone for some reason. This site as millions of users. The opinion of three users does not form a consensus.Livius Plinius (talk)17:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a straightforward statement. Cites specific issues related to content and policies etc and you’ll have no problems.Doug Wellertalk19:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]