Hi Kingsacrificer! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits16:33, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate!

I will look into volunteering.Kingsacrificer (talk)16:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsacrificer Hi there, hope you're well. I noticed you've been editing quite actively at theTeahouse attempting to answer other people's questions. While it's great you are enthusiastic about editing and want to help others, which is exactly the kind of mentality Wikipedia needs, I would suggest getting to know policies and how things work around here before answering questions at the Teahouse. By no means is this message meant to discourage you from editing, however if you are more familiar with our policies it means you can offer users better responses and more helpful feedback. Cheers.Rambley^{(talk /contribs)}09:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rambley,

Thanks for reaching out on my talkpage.

Yes, I realised myself that I wasn't well-equipped to answer questions on Teahouse, when it was pointed out by an OP that WP allows 'fair use' while Commons doesn't.

I will be more measured and judicious in the future. Cheers!Kingsacrificer (talk)09:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please read the FPC guidelines and you will understand my whale nomination.Charlesjsharp (talk)19:01, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Charlesjsharp

I am looking through theFPC Formal guidelines as well as theImage Guidelines, and I legit cannot find anything related to single or multiple nominations that would be relevant here. In fact, I cannot find anything that proves my own point. I am new here so I'm sure I have messed up, I apologise.

If you want, I can remove my comment from the nomination.Kingsacrificer (talk)07:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The process is that youremove the comment like this.
If you wish to challenge the legitimacy of a nomination from a regular nominator, you can always ping them on their talk page.Charlesjsharp (talk)08:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the guidelineread the section on Set nominationsCharlesjsharp (talk)08:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for directing me to the link. I have retracted my statement and read the guidelines more carefully now. Sorry again for the inconvenience.Kingsacrificer (talk)10:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your speedy fromPentrebach, Swansea. Speedy criterion A7 doesn't apply to pages.LeapTorchGear (talk)13:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for missing out on a guideline.

Should I apply it to 'Proposed Deletion' then?Kingsacrificer (talk)16:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsacrificer: No, you should add the text from the Welsh-language article on the community atcy:Pentre-bach, Abertawe orhttps://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentre-bach,_Abertawe to the article., as well as any other relevant references that you can find. Once you have done that, notability should be clearly established.LeapTorchGear (talk)23:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kingsacrificer,

You have only been editing for a week, it is too soon for you to start tagging pages for deletion. Admin tasks require a thorough knowledge of policy and guidelines. Do you know all of the CSD criteria? Once you do, you can consider getting more involved in administrative tasks. As for now, please work on improving content and some of our 7 million articles rather than setting yourself up as a judge of what should and shouldn't be deleted on the project. You can easily get in way over your head and find yourself blocked. Happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!01:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Liz and @LeapTorchGear

I will keep your comments in mind. I had read through the criteria guidelines, but may have missed an important point. I'll be careful.Kingsacrificer (talk)08:43, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to DYK! But a reminder that your QPQs need to be complete as in check the nomination against all of the criteria. See theDYK guidelines for help and try using the{{DYK checklist}}. Your rationales inTemplate:Did you know nominations/Homeopathy Unrefuted andTemplate:Did you know nominations/Denise Stoklos only use one or two of the criteria and are completely vague as to why the criteria are failed; take a look atWP:DYKINT, as well as the essaysUser:Theleekycauldron/Why some hooks are interesting andUser:Theleekycauldron/Tell me something interesting. And please sign your comments.ミラP@Miraclepine01:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Miraclepine,

Thank you for reaching out on my Talk page. I was unaware of the entire guidelines and only seeked to make a comment on the nomination, not give a verdict. I'll take care with further nominations. Thank you for sharing the links. And I thought my comments would be autosigned, but apparently not.Kingsacrificer (talk)10:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleDevendra Fadnavis hasfailed. Seethe review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMCE89 --MCE89 (talk)02:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded toKingsacrificer for copy edits totaling over 6,000 words (including rollover words) during theGOCE October 2025 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Miniapolis15:49, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Azim Premji on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)10:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:History of Anatolia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)01:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PerWP:AIBLPIMAGE, we do not use AI generated images on biographies of living people. The imageFile:Prashant Kishor during a press conference on Bihar Assembly elections.jpg is blatantly an AI generated image. Please do not restore this image to that article again. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk)20:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I asked this on the Commons page as well. How can you confidently say that it is an AI generated image? I'm confused.Kingsacrificer (talk)20:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you on the deletion discussion. It's actually rather easy. --Hammersoft (talk)21:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

... of what use is this to anyone ?https://www.imdb.com/name/nm16276851/Marcus Markup (talk)20:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought there was a series that he worked on as a writer. But I dug deeper and couldn't find it. I guess it's a fake edit.Kingsacrificer (talk)08:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added theWP:PROD template toWebster's Microcomputer Buyer's Guide which @BOZ started. The proposed deletion should only be used for uncontroversial deletes, where you don't expect any opposition to the deletion.WP:N is not such a case because it may be possible to add sources to the article, which I have done now. --Cyfal (talk)07:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Cyfal. I apologise. I did not expect opposition to the deletes because I searched for sources myself and couldn't find any.

TheNominating section onWP:PROD links us toWP:DEL-REASON which states Notability as a factor. If this is incorrect, I thinkWP:PROD should be modified to include a list of criteria that qualifies a page for proposed deletions instead of AfD.Kingsacrificer (talk)09:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it is all a learning process here. It is a judgment call on whether PROD or AFD is appropriate. Sometimes PROD is better because other people may do a source search and have more skill in finding sources than the nominator, so the PROD can be easily removed when they do.BOZ (talk)09:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries from me, too.WP:DEL-REASON is indead a list criteria for PROD. Missing sources are covered by item 6 and 7. Of course it is nota priori impossible to find sources forWebster's Microcomputer Buyer's Guide, so item 6 does not hold. Thus, it depends on how one interprets the word "thorough" in item 7 whether PROD or AfD is appropriate in case you found no additional sources. --Cyfal (talk)18:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the copyedit onTierOne Bank!–DMartin23:02, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks!Kingsacrificer (talk)08:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	Here is a small barnstar for helping add book cover images. As you do more, I will award more barnstars. Welcome to Wikipedia.Iljhgtn (talk)07:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, haha!Kingsacrificer (talk)19:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

Webster's Microcomputer Buyer's Guide

added a link pointing toTony Webster

World Atlas of Language Structures

added a link pointing toDavid Gil

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)22:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to thepurposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicablepolicies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain fromgaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you maylearn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g[V•T•E]00:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]