User talk:Keironoshea
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Thanks for uploadingFile:TonyrefailWelfareLogo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)19:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Keironoshea! Your additions toAnnie Powell have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have addedcopyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in thepublic domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under asuitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to preventcopyright andplagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in beingblocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.MCE89 (talk)10:09, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work onHarry Dobson (International Brigades). Another editor,Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Very interesting; just a few more citations needed.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Tony Holkham}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tony Holkham(Talk)12:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - a quick note about this,Rhondda Sports Centre. For me there are a few issues with the article:
Hope these suggestions are helpful. The article certainly needs a re-write/better sourcing.KJP1 (talk)09:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work onFrank Owen (International Brigades). Another editor,Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Well done; another fascinating article about the Sp Civil War.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Tony Holkham}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tony Holkham(Talk)13:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work onLle'r Gaer. Another editor,Kudpung, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Please repair the syntax of one reference.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Kudpung}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)01:10, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit toDarren Millar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence ofpermission from the copyright holder. If youare the copyright holder, please readWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without anappropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofcontent, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policywill beblocked from editing. SeeWikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)13:55, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toTorolv Solheim. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)22:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Helo, thank you for conducting assessments on various articles. I appreciate the effort, but as assessments are naturally subjective to the editor (some projects may be more strict with them, but most are largely the same) as long as you followed the criteria faithfully and the rating can be justified then just rate it and move onto the next one.
For the rationales, just leave the ones you've written up so far, in the end you spent the effort and appreciate that! The rationales aren't wrong, but most of the time editors don't write them, unless the/your assessment has been disputed. Although it can be seen as potentially praise and encouragement for any new articles made by new editors so not a bad thing. Plus your rationales may raise good points on how to improve the article! If you wish to remove them though, as long as no one has commented on it (so not atTalk:Net World Sports) then you can self-revert, but there is no actual issue with it, just that there's no need to spend so much time on them in most cases.
Once again, nothing wrong with writing rationales, but they're not really done and well there is so much more of everything else to do! Diolch.DankJae22:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNeil Kinnock, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesNorman Hogg andDerek Foster. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)18:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Keironoshea. I ran acrossDuncan Ferguson (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) and am wondering if it would be best if all your recent edits to it were rolled back given the numerous poor sources. Do you have time to review all the sources you used againstWP:RSP andWP:RSN, and remove all that are not up toWP:BLP criteria? --Hipal (talk)21:06, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDuncan Ferguson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNTL.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I saw your recent AfD where you intended to withdraw and didn't know how - you may be interested in installingWikipedia:XFDcloser. Makes this easy.
By the way, thanks for volunteering at AfC (I'm about to accept your request). I was intrigued to see that you had such an old account, and was wondering what motivation brought you back to the project after so long away. A worthy one, I think. Not terribly unlike my own. You may be interested in joiningWP:@, a small and close-knit wikiproject where you'd be very welcome. Cheers. --asilvering (talk)20:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You disrespect the dead, you keep breaking copyright laws.
What in the flip is wrong with you, son?
You definitely went on r/wikipedia, to find articles to vandalize. We know people like you.
But vandalizing articles of a dead person. That is disgusting of you, you should be ashamed of yourself.Shrekipedia69 (talk)19:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Javier Polo article is not primary but secondary websites, newspapers that explain he is the president of a National Association, regional government websites as Xunta de Galicia referring to the prizes he won, and others.83.52.38.125 (talk)12:01, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work onTyntyla Isolation Hospital. Another editor,Klbrain, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this interesting article for an isolation hospital. I considered whether it would be better merged toYstrad, where it is already discussed as part of the history, but I think that it warrants separate discussion. We could also frame the article in terms of its modern use, but I think that it's historical role is better referenced in reliable sources. So, 'no change' from me!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk)16:59, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMilitant tendency, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesEric Shaw andMartin Pugh.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I see you've removed a number of unused parameters from inboxes in several articles includingthis. Is there some reason for doing that? It is of course useful to remove invalid or deprecated parameters, but otherwise it may be best to just leave them alone – I suggest that having them there (a) does no harm and (b) might encourage editors to make the infobox more complete. Your thoughts?Justlettersandnumbers (talk)10:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toCentral Labour College. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)09:26, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDemocratic Left (Great Britain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSocialist Alliance.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:55, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
