Your feedback is requested atTalk:Hector Berlioz on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)22:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)02:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, we violated the 1,000-word limit set for the RfC discussions forWP:PIA. To trim it a bit, you can remove all points from my replies except for 1, 4, and 13 and edit your own accordingly. I am not sure if this is fine, but I suppose it is.Kelob2678 (talk)21:11, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt an admin would enforce retroactively when it wasn’t clear if word limits apply, but they would be less amenable to further increasing word count after having been informed of the word limitBluethricecreamman (talk)21:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you guys already notified @Jcgaylor then. I was going to let him know too. Thanks for that. It would be good to know for sure if the comments are just discarded in full if not cut down to 1,000 words or less? Or if he cannot go over the limit any further then? How does that work? Please ping me for the answer as I likely will not be back on this talk page otherwise.Iljhgtn (talk)21:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They arent discarded. Most closers in my experience, are just skimming past 1000 words usually, even in topic areas without that word limit.

just dont engage with that rfc discussion anymore, and dont do 1000 words in rfcs, rms, or other formal discussion in the israel palestine spaceBluethricecreamman (talk)00:28, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ping: @Kelob2678, @Bluethricecreamman@Iljhgtn

Following the guidance of the involved administrator, I will preserve my comments as they stand, but refrain from further involvement. I feel I made all necessary comments, and no new arguments have been presented by the other side of the debate.Jcgaylor (talk)22:42, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)04:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageSouth Carolina Freedom Caucus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Amissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)07:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcgaylor. Thank you for your work onSouth Carolina Freedom Caucus. Another editor,Aesurias, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Looks great! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Aesurias}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aesurias (talk)08:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Portuguese Nagasaki on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)14:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]