User talk:Jackattack1597
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Archives | |
| |
It was a good close, I just wanted to point out in the count it’s actually a 5-2. Don’t forget about the nominator as well. Generally if they are doing a procedural or proxy nomination they will mention so in there nomination it self.McMatter(talk)/(contrib)21:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, by the way it'sCam Drawel here. May I know which part of the page I deleted? The anonymous contestant one?Sorry about that, I just realized that you had just deleted a section which you had inserted yourself, I'll be more careful next time. I already removed the warning on your talk page.Jackattack1597 (talk)13:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Brooks (American veteran) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ThurstonMitchell (talk)09:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I especially appreciate your lack of concern. ;-) Please feel invited to call on me if you see something of which I should be aware, especially if I'm the culprit.BusterD (talk)21:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSouth Carolina Senate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesBrian Adams andVernon Stephens. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)05:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I recently created a draft for an article on Vaush. However, upon seeing that an article on him was recently deleted atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush, I decided to put the article through the AfC process instead of moving it straight to mainspace. If you have any comments feel free to discuss the draft page at its talk pageDraft talk:Vaush. Thanks.Alduin2000 (talk)20:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for participating inPhase 1 of the RfA 2021 review. 8 out of the 21 issues discussed were found to have consensus. Thanks to our closers of Phase 1,Primefac andWugapodes.
The following had consensus support of participating editors:
The following issues had a rough consensus of support from editors:
Please consider joining thebrainstorming which will last for the next 1-2 weeks. This will be followed by Phase 2, a 30 day discussion to consider solutions to the problems identified in Phase 1.
There are 2 future mailings planned. One when Phase 2 opens and one with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.
Best,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of governors of Texas by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.List of governors of California by age has also been included in the nomination withList of governors of Texas by age.OCNative (talk)22:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Following a 2 week brainstorming period and a 1 week proposal period, the30 day discussion of changes to ourRequest for Adminship process has begun. Following feedback on Phase 1, in order to ensure that the largest number of people possible can see all proposals, new proposals will only be accepted for the for the first 7 days of Phase 2. The 30 day discussion is scheduled to last untilNovember 30. Please join the discussion or even submit your own proposal.
There is 1 future mailing planned with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.
16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 | The Barnstar of Integrity | |
| For your help, I appreciated it.Lightburst (talk)14:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
 | Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants)ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particularPrimefac,Lee Vilenski, andYmblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and forTonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.
The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:
Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?Special thanks toxaosflux for help with implementation.
The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:
Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so atRFA's talk page or an appropriatevillage pump.
A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.
This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.
01:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakoa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nekivik (talk)08:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jackattack1597. Thank you for your work on1997 Virginia Attorney General election.User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with~~~~.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠(contact)11:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTennessee Senate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBrent Taylor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totalitarian architecture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello - Thank you for creatingWyandot Nation of Kansas!
I just saw onWyandot people#Contemporary Wyandot groups that there is another unrecognized group in Trenton, Michigan and was wondering (hoping) that perhaps you would be interested in creating an article for that as well?
Kindest regards,Gjs238 (talk)14:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on thevoting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, pleasereview the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF)23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Thank you for making presidential data district maps! I've noticed that there are some incorrect district data in most of the maps, but I have fixed some of them. I wanted to show you this website so it could be easier to access the correct data for each district[1]GatewayPolitics (talk)00:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
