User talk:IntrepidContributor
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This isIntrepidContributor'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
👋👋 Thanks for your edits.666hopedieslast (talk)15:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest inarticles aboutliving or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place{{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest inEastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place{{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
EvergreenFir(talk)19:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is your old account? You probably need to inform the admins (not sure of the procedure) so as not to be blocked for socking.--Ermenrich (talk)17:34, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,IntrepidContributor!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!JBW (talk)18:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
ha ha
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/666hopedieslast666hopedieslast (talk)17:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removedmaintenance templates fromPatrick Lancaster. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Please seeHelp:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has beenreverted. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use yoursandbox.Do not remove maintenance templates without first resolving the issues.Netherzone (talk)17:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They are rather tricky. SeeHelp:Notifications. You need to either link the username you wish to notify (ping) [[user:Adakikio]], {{u|Adakikio}} or use a notification template such as{{ping}} or one of its many aliases{{yo}} or{{reply to}}. The notification template has the advantage of notifying multiple users. Example: {{yo|Adakikio|Netherzone|IntrepidContributor}}. In the same save, you must have your signature ~~~~ Both must be saved at the same time. You should see the bell icon at the top of your page turn red which when clicked will drop down with a message stating the ping was successful. You will likely need to refresh the page or open another page to see the red bell. If it doesn't work, see suggests at the top of the help page. CheersAdakiko (talk)21:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are there more RS that describe him as a purveyor of disinformation and propaganda? Might be good to include others. One seems marginal for this claim. CheersAdakiko (talk)10:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you are going to use peoples non participation in a discussion as evidence against them, it might be a good idea if you notified them about said discussion before doing so. Not everyone watches every single page on Wikipedia.Slatersteven (talk)10:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2022 Russia–Ukraine peace negotiations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFiona Hill. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
—Caorongjin💬11:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]If I see anything likethis again I will block your account. Thank you for understanding.Ymblanter (talk)14:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit account is currently under discussion on Noticeboard here:[6].ErnestKrause (talk)13:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I haven't read any of the above except for clicking the first diff, so this note is limited to that only. But a note for future reference: whenever you undo an archive and move the closing summary to the bottom as normal comment, which you generally shouldn't do, you need to ensure that it is made clear that it wasyou who did that. Like so:<other user's comment> →Archive undone and closing summary moved. [your sig] Thanks.El_C00:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.You have breached 3RR in this quest to add a cn tag to a statement that has thousand of sources. Please self-revert.CMD (talk)13:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:IntrepidContributor reported by User:Chipmunkdavis (Result: ). Thank you.CMD (talk)13:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk)18:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]An automated process has detected that when you recently editedOPEC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJohn Kirby.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Modussiccandi (talk)11:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~HAL33301:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you. ~HAL33307:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So, with that in mind, do not restore that section unless further discussion comes to the opposite conclusion, or (more likely IMO) one of the conditions mentioned in the discussion as warranting more extensive discussion in the article, i.e. Musk getting prosecuted under the Logan Act, comes to pass.Daniel Case (talk)19:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~HAL33307:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Zaborona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)11:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Drone warfare during the Russo-Ukrainian War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)17:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The request for clarificationShould disputed content be left in a BLP while discussion is ongoing? has been closed andarchived. For the Arbitration Committee,DreamyJazztalk to me |my contributions08:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Krusik arms export scandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)15:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Drone warfare during the Russo-Ukrainian War".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!Hey man im josh (talk)16:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Krusik arms export scandal".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!Hey man im josh (talk)15:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IntrepidContributor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Continuity-of-society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)13:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related totheArab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
starship.paint (RUN)15:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You've violated 1RR on Talk:Gaza genocide. Please self-revert.Levivich (talk)17:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isIntrepidContributor. Thank you.Levivich (talk)18:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you ping someone from a discussion to another discussion you cannot selectively exclude other editors. This is your only warning.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)13:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do not edit war, even on talk pages, and even over internal processes. If you believe there was a violation of TPG or other disruptive editing bring it toWP:AE orWP:ANI. This warning is a result ofthis AE report.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)17:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related toCOVID-19, broadly construed. This is a standard message to inform you thatCOVID-19, broadly construed is a designated contentious topic. This messagedoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please seeWikipedia:Contentious topics.TarnishedPathtalk00:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I know you mean well, but my section title was actually carefully chosen and your merge with a separate section obscured the important point. What's done is done, but in the future it's best not to rearrange other people's comments. -Palpable (talk)18:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You havebeen accused of being a sock puppet inWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz. You should respond to charges on that page. Your silence may be used against you, and if you are found guilty you will be blocked forever, locked, on all Wikipedia projects.5.47.169.16 (talk)11:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You just deleted an entire article without following any deletion process. Please revert. -Palpable (talk)01:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It just needs somebody with the time/patience/expertise to do it, while respectingWP:CITEREF for the target article.. If you are not planning on performing the proper merge, then please revert your own redirect until either you have the time or can request someone else to do the complete process which you have failed to perform.TiggerJay (talk)07:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will do my best...in my time.TiggerJay (talk)20:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bythe consensus of the Wikipedia community, you areWP:TBAN topic-banned from the topic of COVID-19, broadly construed. In addition, you have beenindefinitely blocked until the accusations made in the linked section of ANI are retracted. -The BushrangerOne ping only04:06, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]