Cleared out everything old toArchive 1. Clickhere to leave a message.
You are right, your edit of the Kirby page was correct, the revert in error. Sorry, but there have been a number of articles, includingMMR vaccine where very useful whale.to links (which generally have a trove of salient archived research studies) have been deleted repeatedly by a cadre of editors who can't see past certain editorial comments at the website. Thanks for catching the error.Ombudsman04:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I nearly db-bio'd that page myself.
In fact, it's an overwriting of an existing if pretty ordinary page.
I've reverted it.
I have to go, can you recommend the user for a vandalism block?
Thanks,Ben Aveling09:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Really, I'm going any minute, truely I am.
I believe the overwrite of the intro essay might because it is such a sneaky sort of blanking attack.
I'm happy to wait and see.
Thanks!Ben Aveling09:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you claim this is a nonsense page?
Sorry, but I do not agree with you that communicating is a redundant feature of computers. In fact it is one of the most important features of computers beside information processing.Charlie09:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note to say that I moved the recipe you deleted toWikibooks:Cookbook:Menudo. It is true that Wikipedia is not a cookbook, as you state in your summary, but please consider moving the recipe to the Wikibooks section, or maybe even the talk page of the article so that others can move the recipe to the Wikibooks section. ThanksJoaquin Murietta16:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
PS there is a template you can use next time: {{Move to Wikibooks Cookbook}}
Hi mate, noticed you're a bit of a footy fan. Finally there is something going on on Wikipedia in regards to footy. Check outWikiProject AFL, see you there.Rogerthat12:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Indium. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]