HiHteiktinhein! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest atthe Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors likeCullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered byHostBot on behalf of theTeahouse hosts 16:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Hteiktinhein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction andGetting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try theTask Center.

Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!GPL93 (talk)00:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Burmese MLBB clans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Liz^Read!Talk!18:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why? @HteiktinheinSoeThiha5 (talk)05:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hay dude, it is a category page 😂😂😂Hteiktinhein (talk)05:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKhin Khin Gyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khin Khin Gyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘^{Need any help?}07:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofPabhāvatī at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!CMD (talk)09:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

We are excited to invite you to become a part of themeta:Myanmar Wikimedia Community User Group (MWCUG). As a recognized Wikimedia affiliate, our mission is to promote free knowledge, support local content creation, and build a strong community of Wikipedians in Myanmar.

Why join MWCUG?

• Collaborate with like-minded individuals passionate about sharing knowledge
• Contribute to the growth of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in Myanmar languages
• Increase Myanmar-related content in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects
• Participate in local and international Wikimedia events and initiatives
• Gain skills in editing, content creation, and community organizing
• Help preserve and promote Myanmar's rich cultural heritage online

Whether you're an experienced editor or new to Wikipedia, your contribution is valuable. Join us in our mission to make knowledge freely accessible to all in Myanmar!

To learn more or become a member, please visit our Meta-Wiki page:Myanmar Wikimedia Community User Group

Sincerely,Ninja✮Strikers^«☎»04:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for editing and helpMa Mya became an article. I thought this article (when was draft) was deleted because lack of quality. but finally you helped me, Thank you again.Notti.pyh (talk)10:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Pls create more and I will help you.Hteiktinhein (talk)06:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofShin Iza Gawna at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!BlueMoonset (talk)20:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hteiktinhein, this is one of at least three nominations that are approaching two months old, the point at which nominations run out of time at DYK. I notice that you've posted that you're on vacation; unfortunately, if you wish to pursue these any further, you need to deal with the issues right away, before they are closed as unsuccessful. Best of luck!BlueMoonset (talk)20:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My personal apologies as the reviewer ofPabhāvatī that I am not able to help further with this, it's out of my area. I'm glad at least that I was able to read the article. Have a good holiday,CMD (talk)10:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HelloHteiktinhein! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Should i open ANI case?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hteiktinhein,

I wanted to let you know that I just taggedThae Su Nyein for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to anamespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Thae Su Nyein to be deleted, you cancontest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

jlwoodwa (talk)07:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlwoodwa Wrong sent ?Hteiktinhein (talk)07:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, thePage Triage tool sends that message to the creator of the redirect. You moved the article to draftspace, so you made the initial revision of the redirect that is left behind – i.e., you technically created it.jlwoodwa (talk)07:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why? @HteiktinheinSoeThiha5 (talk)05:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this article was created byUser:Yuzy Okkotsu1, a sock master. I’m the one who moved it to Draft space and took action to have it deleted multiple times.

It's similar to when I moved yourLu Hpring article to Draft space—Page Triage automatically sends a message to the creator of the redirect, not the original creator. This was already explained above byUser:Jlwoodwa, and I hope you understand English well enough to follow the explanation.Hteiktinhein (talk)06:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hteiktinhein, good day brother. thank you for the look and acceptance of my Wikipedia articles, I'm also moving forward to asking you to review my pending articles ofDraft:Kyaw Myo Min,Draft:Khaing Thu Kha andDraft:Marriza (singer), it has not been reviewed actively mostly for 3 weeks. Therefore, I would like to take the opportunity to present this article to you and for you to review it.. Thank you!KhantWiki (talk)11:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KhantWiki I accepted two of your articles, however I'm still not sure about Kyaw Myo Min, so left for other editor for further review. Thanks for creating current trend subjects on Wikipedia. Keep up your nice work.Hteiktinhein (talk)12:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the two articles, I appreciate it for the support ako Hteiktinhein, we can leave the Kyaw Myo Min article to others editors for a formal and well-reviewed experience. It's really nice working together with you and all the Myanmar WikiProject members, to improve topics, create articles and events, making friends, cooperate and discuss about Myanmar and its colorful and vibrant culture, it's a really refreshing, knowledgeable and enlightening experience. I hope we can all enjoy the journey of making the English Burmese Wikipedia a better place for all. Yours sincerely,KhantWiki (talk)12:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KhantWiki By the way, I suggest that you create articles for 'Western Regional Military Command [my]' and 'Northeastern Regional Military Command [my]' on English Wikipedia. These articles are really needed on Wikipedia. If you're interested, please consider doing so. Thanks!Hteiktinhein (talk)12:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KhantWiki Please note that the formal review process may take three months or more. Be patient if you submit draft articles. Let me give you some advice: as an experienced editor, you can create articles directly without using the draft space. However, if you create an article directly in the mainspace, please ensure that it is notable enough to meet the criteria outlined inWP:GNG andWP:BASIC. If not, someone may challenge its notability and open a discussion forAfD.Hteiktinhein (talk)12:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really good idea Ko Hteiktinhein, I am interested to create the Western Regional Military Command and Northeastern Military Command articles of Myanmar in the future on the English Wikipedia and I will consider doing so, and they're very much needed on Wikipedia. I can wait anytime for the articles to be even if longer than 3 months, as I'm a well-informed Wikipedia editor, and also that's a great advice, that as an experienced editor, I do like the idea of creating articles directly without using the draft space, only if the articles are notable and meet the criteria for notability guidelines, while it's more straightforward and to create articles directly, it's acknowledgeable to create in submitting draft articles as well which I prefer over creating articles directly, that way you can gain more attraction and attention from people and administrators, and which I actually believe can usually extend your influence on Wikipedia, which I believe is a more fun and enjoyable experience to editing Wikipedia. I can truly understand that some people may take over creating articles directly rather than submitting it for review, therefore I really respect and also accept your opinion and view. Thank you for your advice Ko Hteiktinhein, I will be sure to note it as well. By the way, I would like to invite you to review dozens of my Wikipedia articles of Marriza (singer), Northeastern Regional Military Command (Myanmar), Aung La (singer), Thurein Tun, Khaing Thu Kha, and Tin Maung Win (general), I will provide a example, you only have to mark the articles with a "The page Northeastern Regional Military Command (Myanmar) has been reviewed."KhantWiki (talk)13:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part ofGlobal reminder bot to let you know that yourWP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 17:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything.To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself tom:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk)19:43, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hteiktinhein.Please complete the article as it was rejected after the first attempt.Please help by adding information to the article.^Yuzy (talk)02:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why?SoeThiha5 (talk)05:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my creation—it was created byUser:Yuzy Okkotsu1, a sock puppet, who asked me to help expand or accept the article. It's quite strange that you can't seem to read English. If you could, you should have understood this sentence: "Hello Hteiktinhein. Please complete the article as it was rejected after the first attempt. Please help by adding information to the article."

I suspect that you created the article using AI or machine translation. Don't try to attack me or Wikipedia—I'm not like your mentors.Hteiktinhein (talk)05:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why? @HteiktinheinSoeThiha5 (talk)05:46, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hteiktinhein. Thank you for your work onEleven Agricultural Districts. Another editor,North8000, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|North8000}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk)14:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hteiktinhein, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!—Femke 🐦 (talk)12:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toKho Nan Shin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability andthat its only source is youtube.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.~/Bunnypranav:<ping>15:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I’ve added two more sources: one is a town history book that includes information on the pagoda's history, and the other is an offline book titled "ခိုနန်းရှင်လိုဏ်ဂူတော်သမိုင်း မှတ်တမ်း" ("The Historical Record of the Cave Pagoda Kho nan Shin"), which contains research on the pagoda. However, a YouTube documentary video about the pagoda by a notable media outlet can also be used as a source on Wikipedia. Thanks!Hteiktinhein (talk)18:21, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :D~/Bunnypranav:<ping>03:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On22 June 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleAreindama, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the legendaryAreindama spear was said to make sour limes taste sweet when struck with it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Areindama. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Areindama), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk)00:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toThonbanhla Monastery. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Onel5969^{TT me}19:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 …Really? What is the clear reason for moving this article to draft? You stated that "it needs more sources to establish notability"—what the hell is that supposed to mean? The article now has three sources from Myanmar's biggest media outlets. They are all significant and directly discuss the temple, not just mention it in passing. I'm really confused. This temple is an important historical site from the 16th century and a major tourist attraction. There’s absolutely no issue with notability here.

I'm depressed and annoyed by your habit of randomly moving articles to draft, seemingly just to inflate your edit count or for some other strange reason. I’ve seen you move many articles to draft space, even when they’re clearly notable. I was shocked by your unexplainable actions months ago, and now it's my turn—one of my articles has been moved. I'm not the kind of editor who will just let someone like you do whatever they want. I plan to open an ANI case against your unreasonable behavior, not just on my behalf but for the many other editors affected by this.

Sure, I could accept it if the article was poorly sourced or truly lacked notability. But you move all types of articles the moment you touch them. If you have that much free time, maybe don’t waste it disturbing other editors on Wikipedia. I get that you may think you're acting in good faith, but honestly, I don't think your actions are helping Wikipedia at all. Honestly.Hteiktinhein (talk)04:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part ofGlobal reminder bot to let you know that your permission "autoreviewer" (Autopatrolled) will expire on 00:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew atWP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved.To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself tom:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk)19:41, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hteiktinhein, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!—Femke 🐦 (talk)06:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Femke: I’d like to ask — in the future, do I really need to provide English translations of source titles? I thought this was only required when nominating an article for DYK or GA. Please clarify for me. Thanks!Hteiktinhein (talk)19:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My main reasons for granting temporarily were the issues voorts identified, the lack of page numbers and the small issue ofWP:TSI. To grant autopatrolled, I must assess how well editors understand verifiability. Providing translated titles is a much smaller issue. Tldr; it's not obligatory, but it will make admins jobs easier assessing the 'application' and is in line with the spirit of verifiability.—Femke 🐦 (talk)20:22, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Femke noted with thanksHteiktinhein (talk)05:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ခင်လေးနွယ် wikipedia profile လုပ်ပေးပါဦး။Maymudra (talk)00:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related toarticles aboutliving or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to thepurposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicablepolicies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain fromgaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk)09:32, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloHteiktinhein, the biographies of living persons policy prohibits restoring content others have removed in good faith without having found a consensus to do so, for example on the article's talk page.

To ensure that material about living people is written neutrally to a high standard, and based on high-quality reliable sources, theburden of proof is on those who wish to retain, restore, or undelete the disputed material.

When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first. Material that has been repaired to address concerns should be judged on a case-by-case basis.
— Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons § Restoration

If youedit war disputed content back into an article, you may beblocked from editing to prevent it from continuing, while those removing the material can rely on an exception described atWP:3RRNO's number 7 and wouldn't be blocked for their participation in the same edit war.

Furthermore, the verifiability policy (sectionsWP:ONUS andWP:BURDEN) is in favor of keeping material removed, even in non-biographies, unless the verifiability is proven and a consensus has been found for inclusion.

Thank you very much for creating a talk page discussion about this. I have now invitedSkywatcher68,Plasticwonder andMaelle887766 to it on their talk pages using{{Please see}}. If there is a consensus to restore the material, please let me know (after a week or two at minimum, so thatMaelle887766 had the chance to find the discussion and to reply as well).

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk)09:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, @ToBeFree. I learned a new policy from you. I restored it once due to a misunderstanding, and I wasn’t aware that you are an admin. I’ve already started a discussion on the talk page, and I hope more editors will join in.

We Burmese editors are very few — only about four of us are currently active on English Wikipedia — but we are ready to help prevent COI issues and provide evidence as well.Hteiktinhein (talk)10:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good.

The others are now joining the discussion, this is perfect. At the moment, it seems that the content can soon be restored. Let's wait a week or two to see ifMaelle887766 has good arguments against restoration, but it currently seems that consensus will be in favor of adding the material. And if a consensus has been found, it can be enforced even if one single editor (perhaps with a conflict of interest) disagrees.~ ToBeFree (talk)19:34, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On5 November 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleKo Myo Shin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that legend has it thatKo Myo Shin(statue pictured) became a spirit after allowing his head to be cut off? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Ko Myo Shin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Ko Myo Shin), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

♠PMC♠(talk)00:02, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofPrince Thagara at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Daniel Case (talk)20:39, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given that several days have passed since the nomination was closed, and given how we generally don't re-open closed nominations except for exceptional circumstances, it is unlikely that it will be re-opened. However, if you are able to bring the article togood article status, you are free to renominate the article for DYK. Being brought to GA also likely means that whatever issues were raised in the DYK nomination would already be resolved, bolstering its chances for next time.Narutolovehinata5 (talk ·contributions)06:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On27 November 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articlePrince Thagara, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatPrince Thagara was so handsome that the futureQueen Supayalat disguised herself as a man just to get a glimpse of him? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Prince Thagara. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Prince Thagara), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) andSennecaster (Chat)00:02, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,067 views (752.8 per hour), making it one of themost viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk •contribs) (he/it)03:29, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation