User talk:Hkelkar
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 |
| 1234567 |
| The time & day is05:07, Monday, October 27, 2025 (UTC) |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Total edits | 4258 |
| Distinct pages edited | 546 |
| Average edits/page | 7.799 |
| First edit | 01:58, 24 August 2006 |
| (main) | 1999 |
| Talk | 773 |
| User | 94 |
| User talk | 994 |
| Image | 17 |
| Template | 1 |
| Category | 4 |
| Category talk | 3 |
| Wikipedia | 349 |
| Wikipedia talk | 24 |
| As of the signature timestampHkelkar07:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] | |
Immediate Work NeededThe following articles have been ruined by racist wikipedians with misrepresented citations and fake references
Articles Created/Worked on:
Current Projects:
Future Projects:
Useful Wikipedia Links:
Immediate Tasks:
 | On21 September,2006,Did you know? was updated with a fact from the articlepoverty in Pakistan, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the"Did you know?" talk page. |
User:Hkelkar put a strong effort onPoverty in Pakistan -BakamanBakatalk02:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| ToHkelkar for his contributions to articles related toJews,India,Caste andHinduism --S |/\08:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] |
 | The Original Barnstar | |
| For working extensively on articles related to theIndian subcontinent I,Freedom skies17:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC), award you with this Original Barnstar.[reply] |
For all the crap you go through.--D-Boy18:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
interesting discussion --D-Boy07:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"South Asian Caste System" anyone?Bakatalk17:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dear HKelkar, first of all thanks for pointing me to theWP:AGF andWP:Civility. I will keep them in mind. But please note that the article in question, has no reference to caste based struggle as discussed on Talk:Indian_caste_system#.22Woman_raped_on_Train_by_Dalits. I suggest keeping in mind the facts we should try to remove the misinterpretation of facts.ਅਜੈ ਪਾਲ ਸਿੰਘ ਅਟਵਾਲ17:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of amusing.--D-Boy02:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks HKelkar, I am short of words to describe the wrongs. There are some websites which allege that Hindu religion has it's roots in christainity. This is sufficiently irritating. Some anonymous editer included these (external) website links in the article. Which I removed. The same found place on talk page, seeking permission for inclusion in article by the anonymous editor. I removed these links, as through subversive means, the links were placed for viewing who view the article. The discussion for inclusion was clearly opposed by all. I removed the links from talk page. There was no objection from anyone. After some days Abecedare restored the links. I remove them, he reverts and give me a 3RR notice. Then, he goes for admin community views. I fail to express and object to the subversive way. I fail to understand the intention of Abecedare. Should the Wikipedia policy conveniently interpreted and used for nefarious activities?
swadhyayee04:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hkelkar, I saw the article and the latest edits. We must try to constructively discuss the changes and work on improving the article. Currently, it looks in a mess. The section on Hindutva views and Dalit views is unreferenced and POV. Do all Dalits have the same view. And whose view is it actually. I think, we need a cited historical scholarly view.
Anyway, we'll talk more on that. I have repaired the e-mail link. It's working now. Mail me. Bye for now. Keep rockin' --S |/\07:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this true HKelkar? I would never like anyone to be blocked for an year and would also not like someone to give such cause. God Bless You.swadhyayee11:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: These refs are for my research purposes only, please do not type between them.
Hi Hkelkar - there's a post atWP:AN about your current editing - I've also sent you an email about it. It's probably best if the only editing you do is within your user-space, at least until December 19th. Just create sub-pages if you want, to work on additions to articles. ThanksMrtinp2319:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This pak as been untagging indus valley with the indian tag on it. Could use some help on this.Szhaider (talk ·contribs) seems to be behind it. He takes the tag off harappa civilization and other indic historic sites as well.--D-Boy21:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize there was more about mobility in the criticism section. Thanks for moving it up.BhaiSaabtalk23:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have violatedWP:3RR by removing part of what I just added, i.e. "individual mobility among castes was generally rare." I ask that you undo this.BhaiSaabtalk23:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Voting on the use of indic scripts.--D-Boy01:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics#Proposal--D-Boy04:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How does it work?Szhaider (talk ·contribs) is being a bit stubborn.--D-Boy05:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have not protected the article, but be aware that excessive reversions of the article may lead to a 3RR block. Take the discussion to the talk page to avoid that. --tariqabjotu16:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look atTalk:Indian caste system/Mediation (December 2006) and begin populating the "issues to be mediated" regarding theIndian caste system article. Also, please sign belowParties' agreement to mediate stating that you "agree" to mediate or "recuse" yourself from the dispute resolution process. Thanks in advance. --tariqabjotu22:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Lists of people by caste--D-Boy05:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No matter what Indian PC media calls it shouldnt it be titled2006 Dalit riots in Maharashtra raher than2006 Dalit protests in Maharashtra?
P.S I was just being sarcastic on the other article! अमेय आर्यन DaBrood©20:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry mate, it looked like a deletion of material. You did nothing wrong and my reversion was accendental. Thanks for your understanding,Dfrg.mc1 .2 .Editor Review00:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not encourage/support users to add commentary to wiki articles. I find it pretty I ironic you remove comments on talk-pages, which are directed at you, and consequently. You support users who add very silly and childish commentary into wiki articles. Please do not do this. Or I will have to issue you a warning and also mention this in your RfA pending case. You should take a break from edition wiki articles for a few months. --15:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You support users who add very silly and childish commentary into wiki articles.
Look who's talking! Moveon chavboy People living in glass houses shouldnt throw stones at others! अमेय आर्यन DaBrood©19:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The people who are doing violence are low-caste-Hindus. They are not Buddhists. The India Buddhist population is less than 0.8%. So restrict yourself before making false claims.Pkulkarni15:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Intrguing...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hindushudra
&
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pkulkarni
I am a member of Sechdule Caste from India andconsider all Indians as Shudras. अमेय आर्यन DaBrood©19:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hello as-salam alaykum HkelkarPlease forgive me, English not is perfect. You seem to write many anti Islamic remarks and have bias viewpoint towards India & Israel. Please keep your biases off Wikipedia جزخ اللہ خیر—The precedingunsigned comment was added byEsteqlal (talk •contribs)20:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
````
I'm sorry, personal attack? There was no personal attack, rather just a constructive criticism from one Wikipedia editor to another. Also, please refrain from deleting my posts on your talk page, as you do not own them. (You may archive this page, however.) Also, please remove your silly writings from my talk page. :) I hope you keep these (constructive) criticisms in mind!
for making personal attacks.Hkelkar20:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you biased? Do you believe you are bias-free?—The precedingunsigned comment was added by68.163.151.18 (talk)23:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Hkelkar, I'm very sorry I accused you of Wikistalking. It was poor judgement, a poor reading of Wikipedia policy, and in very bad faith.
I also apologise for the initial comments I made. I assumed you were doing a complete hatchet job, I barely read the articles in question, and I misread them in my haste and uncalled-for anger to boot.
Furthermore, I attempted to pit you and Ambroodey against your fellow editors. This was not only incredibly disruptive, but trollish on every level. I tried to use a painful topic for my own purposes and forced you to defend yourself.
In reality, I have never treated you correctly. I should have responded to your second post to me as a good faith attempt to work with me. I didn't discuss the article with you, and try to work out any differences we had.
I did these things out of my arrogance and ignorance of Wikipedia policy and guidelines. What I did last night, however, is simply indefensible and wrong on a basic human level.
Again, I humbly apolgise, and I sincerely pray for your happiness, if not forgiveness.
NinaEliza08:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
India Buddhist revival/Dalit Buddhist Movement/Buddhist Revival in India has been moved toBuddhism in modern India.utcursch |talk15:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What can one construe of your recent edits where- where you have 1. removed the title of the HRW report entitled "We have no orders to save you.. to HRW report while you have added a blog on Sulekha to the article?Please change it back to the original title and remove the link to the BlogMerryJ-Ho21:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The whole set of articles supporting that there was and is a rampant Boycott of Muslims in the BJP ruled state of Gujarat.I am copying them again.Please revert the changes back to where they were.MerryJ-Ho10:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]After riots, it’s economic boycott call -
Hkelkar's comments follow:Dude, give up the propaganda soapboxing. None of these incidents happened in the year in question.Hkelkar 11:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)And no, I will not restore your egregious misrepresentations. The "boycott" is not a riot, it's a peaceful act so it does not belong in the article. If you do that then I will post a deluge of articles showing how Muslims in Gujarat are in collusion with Pakistan, the rise of fundamentalism, and the terrorist attacks on Narendra Modi. So do not go there buddy. Hkelkar 11:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I simply never read the article, until the title changed. I still haven't read the whole thing in detail, but I believe it.
Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,NinaEliza03:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have a section on the arbitration page in which I assume you will attempt to prove that "User:TerryJ-Ho supportsIslamism..." My question to you is: so what if he supports Islamism?BhaiSaabtalk15:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
209.197.162.11016:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since you commented on the Hinduism barnstar proposal I recommend you looking at the new designs introduced byUser:Priyanath. Thank you.GizzaChat©22:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2002_Gujarat_violence&diff=prev&oldid=92839450 Your recent edit are based on two editorial opinion articles - which you dont mention in the article while you vociferously fight for clarification of comments attributed to Guardian UK as opinion-editorial - Is that not double standards and raking WP policies when it suits your position and ignoring them when others are not looking.MerryJ-Ho03:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You got all of us banned for one year.BhaiSaabtalk00:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For you addition to theDalit Buddhist Movement article. I wish you the best and continue to pray. I'll be around.Sincerely,NinaEliza04:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In case you haven't been warned already, per the evidence atWP:ANI#Xenophobia...<Discussion has been archived atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive155#Xenophobia>
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will beblocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --tariqabjotu05:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's good to know you've been warned of personal attacks before.I just informed the administrator of the xenophobia you've been promoting on the discussion page,along with personal attacks,racist comments etc.I couldn't help but noticing you and D-Boy concspiring against another Pakistani usser.I also find it curious that you and your freinds happen to post approximately around the same time when grouping against me and other Pakistani wikipedians.Is it possible that you collaborate on the phone or on MSN before posting on talk pages along with luanching personal attacks,stereotypes etc?
Intersting how you and your pals almost tricked me into getting myself blocked.Better luck next time.I warn you from trying similar tricks again in the future.Also dont threaten user:Saddiqui or other users by pulling them into edit wars and then trying to portray them as the instigators.Most people have alot more common sense than you think.Nadirali 05:44, 9 December 2006
FYI, Nadirali continues to make incivil and derogatory comments in the talk page[17]. Why does he keep trolling it despite your advice to the contrary?Hkelkar00:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since we're on the subject... it looks quite silly for you to be repeatedly updating me ofNadirali (talk ·contribs)'s provocative statements, while proceeding to makecomments like these. Please, cut it out, as I'm sure you're familiar with Wikipedia'scivility policy. --tariqabjotu01:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was not prudent to follow my warning regarding incivility and personal attacks, withthis commenton my talk page. You have certainly received sufficient warnings to warrant a block. I'll even post toWP:ANI for confirmation. --tariqabjotu02:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hkelkar(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was hardly an incivil comment, and whom was it atatcking? It was an observation based on frustration of tendentious editors who get a free pass on wikipedia while sincere users who strive for accuracy get insulted, harassed, harangued and punished.
Decline reason:
It is uncivil to describe a fellow editor as "spreading baseless propaganda," and a violation of NPA to suggest one is suffering "delusions of religious supremacy" or displaying "narrow tribalist ethnocentrism". Declined --02:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
diff:[18]
You got yourself blocked just before both us will get a year-long block. C'mon yaar.BhaiSaabtalk03:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am shashis, and thank you for your message on my talk page. I am replying late as I am new to wikipedia and did not know that a page such as my talk page existed, I checked it today and found your message. I am still learning the ropes here, and time constraint does not permit me to learn quickly. It seems there are many here with agendas and who do not want correct information to be presented. I have had the first experience with this Ikon ... who seems more interested in making sure that correct information is not presented. He has been playing cat and mouse game with information. Anyway, he is partially responsible for my postings. Initially I had only a passing interest in Wikipedia but his rude comments, accusations, and games have made me stay. I don't like bullys. I like to present correct/unbiased information, as much as I can, although it is not possible many times. Happy learning!
bestshashis—The precedingunsigned comment was added byShashis (talk •contribs)02:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Mamin is protecting that page from anything Anti-Chinese and seems to have a conflict of views on what a modern-day superpower should be like. He could be a good user though in the future, I simply urge you to place the page on your watchlist. I also foundthis, it is a logical point, can we trust the figures? Anyway, I don't know how to place them in the article as it isn't a point against and some users wouldn't allow me to put such Anti-Chinese stuff as a note in the Factors in Favour section, thus spoiling China's unblemished face. 05:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)If you aren't signed up you can see the articlehere as well.05:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This case is now closed and the results have been posted above.
For the Arbitration committee,Cowman109Talk06:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is an appeal possible?06:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 | The articleAnti-Brahmanism, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiringcleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia'squality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on thearticle's talk page. |
Kindly see the talk page on Hindu, a user has taken up an offensive user name. What can be done about this. Regards.59.178.10.6814:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
اے یحود۔ آپ کو کیا ہوا؟ آپ کہان گیا؟
—The precedingunsigned comment was added byMirzaGhalib (talk •contribs).
Hkelkar(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
bhaisaab gets away with socking all the time and I get an indefinate
Decline reason:
This is not a reason to allow you to violate policy. —Yamla19:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hkelkar(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What aboutSiddiqui? Creates a bunch of socks for edit wars and all he gets is one year.Why am I the only one to get indefinate?
Decline reason:
An indef block doesn't mean we won't consider unblocking you after a year, it just means we're under no obligation to unblock you after a year. If you don't go sockpuppeting throughout the course of the next year, I'll likely be quite happy to unblock you. I intend to protect your talk page for a couple of days short of one year now.Nick20:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for uploadingFile:Lynx1.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.MBisanztalk02:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Lynx2.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.MBisanztalk02:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Asia Analysis Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
