Hello, Hektor. You have new messages atTalk:STS-135.
Message added 07:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploadingFile:Monica car logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk03:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Michelin nyc 2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Christian Giersing (talk)06:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Logo 2011 su candidature shenzhen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk06:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A small change, but I changed the category from "Fictional scientists" to "Fictional mad scientists". Let's face it, Davros is about as sane as a sack of rabid ferrets...HalfShadow09:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just wanted an excuse to use the term "Sane as a sack of rabid ferrets", but there you go.HalfShadow21:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hektor. You have new messages atGump Stump's talk page.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

On 4 December 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleIvorian presidential election, 2010, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page.

--Kslotte (talk)12:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 December 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleUSA-212, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page.

--Kslotte (talk)12:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDorothy Doughty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hang on}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you.BurhanAhmed (talk •contribs)17:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofJacques Bourboulon, and it appears to be a substantial copy ofhttp://www.artandpopularculture.com/Jacques_Bourboulon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is notpublic domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)CorenSearchBot (talk)08:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the admin that deletedJacques Bourboulon and the message that you left on the talk page is correct, I should have contacted the creator,mea culpa. I read the statement that he photographed nude teenagers (paraphrased) could not find a reference to confirm it and immediately thoughtG10. In hind site, a rewording of the article, similar to yours, and a notification to contributing editors would have been much more appropriate. You have my apologies and I hope the next time our paths cross it is under more pleasant circumstances.J04n(talk page)12:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJacques Bourboulon has beenproposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onesource that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask atWikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.ϢereSpielChequers20:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:ATV-JohannesKepler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Hugahoody (talk)17:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to explain your reverts, and ideally participate in the discussion atTemplate talk:Current spaceflight if you disagree with the template's guidelines? --Conti|✉09:14, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The template should not remain in place on spacecraft or spaceflights which are undergoing routine operations. They should only be used around the times of major mission events (eg. immediately after launch, during docking/undocking, during EVAs, end of mission, orbit changes, etc), or if something unexpected or anomalous happens (eg. the spacecraft develops a problem or fails completely). --GW…13:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a previous contributor, you might want to have a look atBristol Cars. Another user, with a long history of contentious edits, has deleted nearly the entire page and replaced it with broken up sections. SeeTalk:Bristol_Cars#Removal_of_content for what is going on. Best, ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk)17:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.╟─TreasuryTag►without portfolio─╢10:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on thefile description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf.☼09:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buona sera, Ettore! Sono Shirt58 in Australia. Ciao, come stai?
Apologies for the salutation in Italian; my French isnon-existant. I've taken the liberty to add {{Translated|fr|Tristane Banon}} toTalk:Tristane Banon. And aboutL'Affaire Strauss-Kahn... well, I'm seeingbig, big red flags there, with no relation at all to theirsocialism.
Your thoughts about this? --Shirt58 (talk)11:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• She went to French television (cable TV) to tell the story in 2008. Then it's the word of one individual, I agree.Hektor (talk)11:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Citroen metropolis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)07:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDanièle Sallenave has beenproposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onesource that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask atWikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards,SunCreator^(talk)14:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bjr ,Pensez vous qu'il soit possible de placer le lien facebook ci apreshttp://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.228564727154310.67298.228564230487693

Dans external links de la page naviplane_n500 anglaise ?

C'est un ancien de la sedam qui place photo et commentaires inedits au sujet du n500 sur face de bouc.

Merci de votre avis!Bien à vous— Precedingunsigned comment added by88.181.54.14 (talk)15:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Je ne suis pas assez savant sur les regles wikipedia pour vous repondre.Hektor (talk)13:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Pyeongchang2018.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am abot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this noticeafter the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, clickhere to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it offhere and leave a message onmy owner's talk page.

Thank you.DASHBot (talk)05:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Enough with this, if you do not have a valid reference citing that IOC contacted WF, and that "s", "o", "c", "h", "I", "2", "0", "1", "4" (the most original piece in this work), and the PD-old Olympic rings, are an original work, you will be reported to respective noticeboards. You are owning an image that is less original thanthis work.Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect?Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again WF pseudo-lawyer give solid evidence the work passes thede minimisthreshold of originality, asserting its copyrightability, or thatthe designed agent is responable of that decition.Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect?Correct it!See terms and conditions.07:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we can stop abusing NASASpaceflight.com now?Colds7ream (talk)16:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• This site is not a reliable source. I stand by my comment.Hektor (talk)19:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hektor,

I saw your recent edit in Tristane Banon and was happy to allow it to stand, but a more experienced editor than me, who I am happy to defer to, deleted it. I do think on reflection the reference to Anne Mansouret should definitely have gone on BLP grounds. I shouldn't have allowed that. As for the meeting between lawyers, that's really 'newsy'. If something definite comes of it then perhaps that's the time to include. Since the article began as a translation of the French article, perhaps a good working test for including content (at least it would provide a justification), would be that it appears there. At any rate there's a section on the Talk page if you want to argue your case. Thank you.FightingMac (talk)08:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMandala Tayde has beenproposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onereliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Thompson.matthew (talk)15:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onWilliam Meynard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please seeWikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be onnotable subjects and should provide references toreliable sources thatverify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit thethe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contactone of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. ~Red Rover(Talk to me!)contribs11:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed aspeedy deletion tag fromWilliam Meynard, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says:Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your caseon the page'stalk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -SDPatrolBot (talk)11:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not removespeedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did withWilliam Meynard. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says:Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your caseon the article'stalk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -SDPatrolBot (talk)11:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is yourlast warning; the next time you remove aspeedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did atWilliam Meynard, you may beblocked from editing without further notice. -SDPatrolBot (talk)11:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hektor, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, -SDPatrolBot (talk)11:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Nanjing Youth Olympics 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Courcelles03:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Prometheus spacecraft logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am abot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a{{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this noticeafter the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, clickhere to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it offhere and leave a message onmy owner's talk page.

Thank you.DASHBot (talk)05:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Sochi 2014 - Logo.svg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect?Correct it!See terms and conditions.06:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have taggedFile:Francoise_maitresse.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale onthe image description page. Thank you.Melesse (talk)13:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Liberty launch vehicle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)05:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hektor. You have new messages atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Christmas special (Doctor Who).
Message added 08:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─TreasuryTag►UK EYES ONLY─╢08:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Estelle Desanges - French Kiss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)03:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:French Kiss 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)03:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't seethis video, I think it's because my IP is outside the mainland, is it anything likethis video ?Penyulap _talk14:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Indeed.Hektor (talk)15:34, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on the talkpage.Penyulap _talk16:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 November 2011,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleFobos-Grunt, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page.

Thank you,GreyHood^Talk08:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Vache à boire.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Kelly^hi!15:39, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAleksey Ovchinin has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A cosmonaut who hasn't yet gone into space (according to his record atSpacefacts). Failsnotability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.ClaretAsh12:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deproddingthis. I hadn't yet come across that policy. We live and we learn.ClaretAsh12:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Anyway he should fly soon.Hektor (talk)15:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]