Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedOttoman Empire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesGhazi andBeylik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onTurkey. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware thatWikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Étienne Dolet (talk)20:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please seeWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#WP:BATTLEFIELD threats and constant edit-warring at Turkey. You can respond if you wish. Thank you,EdJohnston (talk)20:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of24 hours foredit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by first reading theguide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.

Nyttend (talk)22:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Heimdallr_of_Æsir reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you.Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις}14:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do notattack other editors, as you did atTurkey. Comment oncontent, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Pleasestay cool and keep this in mind while editing.Saying that you "can't help but wish for the complete economic collapse and starvation of Greece" because of two (named) Greek Wikipedia editors is inappropriate.McGeddon (talk)14:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "starvation" part was a bit too harsh, I must admit. But it's still not as harsh as Greeks and Armenians wishing a Yugoslavia style bloody civil war in Turkey and trying to add some extra fuel on fire for it to become true.Heimdallr of Æsir (talk)16:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the personal attacks and bad faith remarks. Such remarks ofbad faith should not be made towards any user in this project. Especially when no such user has said anything near that. This isbattleground language that's never tolerated.Étienne Dolet (talk)17:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]