Hello, HM7Me, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!JarrahTree23:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced orpoorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia aboutliving (or recently deceased) persons.P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs)13:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atMafalda, you may beblocked from editing.
Your edits have beenautomatically marked asvandalism and have beenautomaticallyreverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:Mafalda waschanged byHM7Me(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.871054 on 2020-10-03T15:31:34+00:00

Thank you.ClueBot NG (talk)15:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youdisrupt Wikipedia, as you did atQuino.AviationFreak💬22:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, as you did atMafalda, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Ktin (talk)23:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, as you did atQuino, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Ktin (talk)01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, as you did atQuino, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Ktin (talk)01:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of60 hours foredit warring and violating thethree-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Loftyabyss01:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not acting as intellectuals and contributorsWhy not create a section like 'controversial views'Why don't you help me instesd of authoritarianly menacing me from not expressing authentic ideas and labelling me a vandal?Is there absolutely no relevance in my text?Who are you? God?The result is wikipedia becomes irrelevant, like gossip magazinesHM7Me (talk)02:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Such a section can be created but it needs to be referenced and neutral (non-opinionated). Also, if someone disagrees with the edits it would be better todiscuss it.Loftyabyss02:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and respecf your contribution and wijipedia. I need wikipedia. I just meant to suggest.obs. I may have used rather innapropriate/passionate discourse and apologise.HM7Me (talk)18:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my typosHM7Me (talk)18:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onEmbraer C-390 Millennium. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.MilborneOne (talk)17:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period oftwo weeks foredit warring, as you did atEmbraer C-390 Millennium. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MilborneOne (talk)18:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]