User talk:Gunnar Hendrich
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user wants you to join WikiProject Alternate History. |
Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk)18:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Every good edit counts so thanks for your work.Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk)19:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more careful with speedy deletion tagging, and make sure you're familiar with thecriteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for deletion.This tagging was way over the line separating "honest mistake" from "blatant abuse" – I find it hard to imagine a more obvious assertion of notability than "He is the current king".17:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to the revert to the talk page!
Du hast eine Antwort dort. Gruß, --buecherwuermleintalk here, please20:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why you decided that this album fell under the criteria for deletion. No, it doesn't have a name yet, but it has an official release date and a single already on the airwaves. It's fine the way it is.71.64.154.24 (talk)20:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,The majority of the section on 'attentional control' does not constitute rephrasing but is taken word-for-word from the article. In spite of the text being cited, this constitutes plagiarism. We ask that this section be modified to appropriately paraphrase the content of the article, or that the section be deleted. Further action will be sought to remove this material if it is not significantly revised or deleted. Thank you.Thedustbuster (talk)21:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the pageKristina barone worked, and it has beenreverted or removed. Please take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing tothis encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use thesandbox. Thank you.TestEditBot (talk)12:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheList of people from Greater Manchester should be as it is (likeList of people from London). I was reverting an editor who had copied and pasted theList of people from Manchester to that article which frankly, is wrong. Please be more careful.--Jza84 | Talk 11:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A page that you have been involved in editing,Marshall Styler, has been listed fordeletion; you may wish to participate in thedeletion discussion. Thank you.StaticGull Talk 15:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Cheers!J.delanoygabsadds17:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I see you have started cleaning up afterWeissmann as well. Feel free to tag his strange redirects with {{db-r3}} for speedy deletion. I'm close to suggesting he be blocked for his disruptive behavior. CheersKevin (talk)09:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gunnar, there is no need to tag this article. Itis important, I was a part of this. Do you know a little bit about this organization? Best --Weissmann (talk)14:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk)14:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gunnar, I would like to make aWikipedia:NAC to Campingkirche with keep and change it tomy proposed stub. You may rewrite or correct this, please. If there is an exsisting article (maybeChurch service) where this could be a section, we can also redirect campingkirche and merge it. Will you please leave a comment atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campingkirche. Your opinion is very appreciated. Thank you and schönes Wochenende.Sebastian scha. (talk)05:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, you proposed my article for deletion. I just wanted to ask some questions, for one I don't understand why. Something about not having coverage in third-party sources. I would just like you to explain that so I can either edit it or remove my contesting. --Ouk (talk)21:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Ouk[reply]
He's causing major disruption. I've already asked him to stop, as did somebody before me. Can something be done?Gamer JunkieT /C16:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I understand... I'm using Twinkle, so it automatically notifies you, but I probably should have just edited it manually once I read your last edit summary so it wouldn't show up. --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here)17:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...for reverting vandalism on my user page!Washburnmav(talk)18:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey,
Yes, I've been disruptive - however, my edits to User:Washburnmav and your own page have to be considered constructive.
I mean, its not like I deleted anything or added fabricated info - everything I put is true and provides its own proof.
156.34.187.139 (talk)18:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least you appreciate the irony ;-)
156.34.187.139 (talk)18:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You guys are slower than most...most days I can get banned in about 5 minutes or so.
Getting lazy?—Precedingunsigned comment added by156.34.187.139 (talk)18:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for adeletion review ofCarpent tua poma nepotes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Thanks, Gunnar! --Petercorless (talk)17:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We are trying to edit our Company Page that someone else created without our permission and the edits are being reverted by you. How can I take control of this page?
Thanks
Thanks for your reply, you nailed it with your explanation. I'll see what my management says but as you say, we cannot stop this, we just have to make sure the information is accurate.
Also noted about posting :)
Best Regards
Sysgen (talk)16:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why, but you had begun editing this page while I was in the middle of correcting the translation from the Spanish, incorporating new information, and merging the Puelche article. Feel free to look it over and add any further info you might have. -LlywelynII (talk)11:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking care of it!Ros0709 (talk)18:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no vandalism in the latest edits (although fragmentary) - every single one is well-cited79.64.63.145 (talk)10:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Forthat :)seresin (¡? )18:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI. I ended up submitting AfD requests for the upper North Branch Potomac River bridges you had previously expressed notability concerns about.
Brian Powell (talk)18:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, Gunnar Hendrich, to theWikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to itstalk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at ourannouncement page and tag their talk page with our project template{{WikiProject Germany}}.A few features that you might find helpful:
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See alsothe tool's wiki page andthe index of WikiProjects.
Here are sometasks you can do.Please remove completed tasks from the list.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!Agathoclea (talk)22:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onAntonio Moresco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.KhalfaniKhaldun02:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gunnar Hendrich,
I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested inUnited States legal articles to take a look atWP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".
Our mission isto assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducinghornbooks to footnotes.
What you can do now:
Regards,Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook20:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you've added the "preceded by" and "followed by" fields to the infoboxes for a number of Philip Roth books. Note that theinfobox page states, "The preceded_by and followed_by fields both apply to books in a series and to sequels." For example, the Harry Potter books. These fields don't apply to Roth's novels (except for theZuckerman Bound trilogy) and I'll be removing them. —D. Monacktalk06:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gunnar Hendrich! Thank you for your contributions. I am abot alerting you that1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Thebiographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensureverifiability, all biographies should be based onreliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current158 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the{{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk)06:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country likeWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa.08:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gunnar Hendrich. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gunnar Hendrich. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦Dr. Blofeld10:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]