Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than185 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

Thanks for the ping. Wow. I blinked and missed that one! I'd have gone for keep.Coretheapple (talk)14:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There was another one onKilling of Brian Thompson buy an IPv6 address that is suspected to be a sock/IP account of the same user that nominated Luigi for deletion. Unfortunately that one got speedy kept before I could comment on it.guninvalid (talk)07:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Say perhaps you could take a look at my second reply to Masem. Curious as to your view on this.Coretheapple (talk)19:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Roseto effect on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at03:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

they got unbanned with source.(preceeding unsigned comment left byUser:Coconut033017:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC))[reply]

and that source is...?guninvalid (talk)20:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look on the Infowars talk page.Coconut0330 (talk)17:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PBS BBC and CBS.Coconut0330 (talk)18:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

we seem to have just missed an edit conflict at that user's talk page. Most of their edits today have been borderline disruptive, so I wonder if you might consider self-reverting to avoid mixed messages? Your call.𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk)09:46, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's fun lol. Typically, when I welcome problematic people, I send a standard welcome and write a new section for the warning, but you seem to have already done that. As disruptive as they may or may not seem (i haven't really looked into it), I do think it is worth at least being welcoming, so they feel they can still correct themselves and feel welcomed. That's just my personal feeling though, so I won't be reverting. Thanks for the tip! I plan to follow the AfD for the next week and if I decide I feel a certain way, maybe then I'll !vote that way. At least for now though, I would prefer to stay on the sidelines.guninvalid (talk)09:53, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@Guninvalid:
I partially disagree with your closure of the requested move that was recently discussed atTalk:June 2025 Los Angeles protests. Even if no consensus exists about the last word of the title of that page, I think that a relatively clear consensus exists in favor of removing the word "June" from the title. If you agree, perhaps you can amend your closure to reflect this. Otherwise, I may open a new move discussion. Thanks! –Gluonz^talkcontribs21:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloUser:Gluonz. Maybe, but that was still a minority opinion, and not the central question in the proposed move. If you think that removing the month could have support, you may open a new RM or take it toWP:AN. For what it's worth, I wouldoppose removing June perWP:CRYSTALBALL.guninvalid (talk)22:12, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Throning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)03:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where to find the information for the infobox.Zaptain United (talk)20:30, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hi @Zaptain United. I saw this when you posted it but I thought you posted this on AWF's page. I don't know, I don't really know much about aviation much in general. I'm just a Wikipedian who watched a shitton of Mentour Pilor and Mayday Air Disaster. I just know some WP policy and some operational stuff about planes; that's it. Sorry for the inconvenience.guninvalid (talk)20:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Throning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!02:29, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:JEL classification codes on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (talk|botop)16:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atCategory talk:Presidential election templates on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)13:41, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great flattening, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk)09:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Soul's Remnant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)05:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Pacu Jalur on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)07:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:ANO (political party) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(trialing replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)11:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:CVE-2025-1094, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)19:07, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)02:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You referred to notability on theChen Weihua talk page, although I don't think you were making any claims about whether the subject itself was notable. I would like to hear your opinion on the article's notability though. I don't think there's any chance of an AfD being worthwhile if an IP were the only one making the case.

1. WP:PSTS, part of the policyWP:OR: "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources." orWP:REPUTABLE, part of the guidelineWP:RS: "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."
2. Most of the article's overview of Chen's career and education are based on profiles that are published by outlets he is affiliated with (universities, newspapers). These profiles are usually submitted by the subject and are only subject to stylistic edits. They are not independent. What remains are a series of articles published that mention or discuss Twitter arguments he has gotten into in the past five or so years.
3. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ira Brad Matetsky (2nd nomination) closed as delete, with the cited rationale: "I am particularly persuaded by 28byte's remarks about the "problems with piecing together a biographical article about someone about whom no proper biography has been written in reliable sources. You get woefully incomplete and outdated scraps of information that do not cohere into a proper, comprehensive narrative about the man’s life and career." We should take this into consideration for all BLP articles, frankly." Do you see this case as analogous?

103.87.254.62 (talk)02:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, looking through the sources, a number of them are obviously garbage. I think I'll go ahead and start a AfD. I can't see him meetingWP:BLP orWP:NJOURNALIST.guninvalid (talk)03:33, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article atPolitical violence in the United States. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:21st century political violence in the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk |contribs)11:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pythoncoder: Would this be able to be moved over the redirect?Political violence in the United States is a redirect to civil disobedience which isn't the same thing.guninvalid (talk)16:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...or rather it was until yesterday.guninvalid (talk)16:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats, yousurvived the Charlie Kirk move discussion. Thanks for all you've done during this time.Babysharkb☩ss2(DEADMAU5)17:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks lmaoguninvalid (talk)17:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Syngenta on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)10:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. This message concerns theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "CVE-2025-1094".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with ourdraftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission, and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!DreamRimmer bot II (talk)19:26, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Passengerpigeon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Snowbreak: Containment Zone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Passengerpigeon (talk)03:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Guninvalid!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Passengerpigeon (talk)03:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid. Your question has been answered at theTeahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions arearchived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added byjolielover♥talk09:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC). (You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hello. You recently reverted an edit on 2025 California Prop 50. You appear to have made a mistake regarding your removal, so I reverted it. An organization's own webpage is considered a valid source. Lists of endorsements should only include endorsements which have been covered byreliable sources,which may include the organization's own website or official social media accounts. News media is itself a reliable source. Based on your criteria, I noticed that you did not remove other endorsements that fell under the exact same criteria (endorsements published by the media organization itself), nor did you remove media endorsements from effectively every election page on this website. I figured you made a mistake when reading the sources.BobSmithME (talk)09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above: using the flawed criteria about 'primary sources', almost all of the organizations & media endorsements in major elections like the2025 New York City mayoral election or2024 United States presidential election would have to be removed.

Please consultWikipedia:ENDORSE @GuninvalidAesurias (talk)10:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:North Korea on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)03:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloGuninvalid! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Notability of news orgs and finding sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Operation Sonnenblume on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)03:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Benjamin Netanyahu on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)22:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC