Please add new discussionsat the bottom of the page!

I've moved earlier discussions to archive pages (as listed below). A few of the items I've simply got rid of - if I have, it's simply that it was trivial and/or stuff which has been dealt with, and is therefore no longer relevant. The deletion is not a reflection of my opinion of the writers!

Hello, I have chose to revert your edits because of how you reworded some sentences. They felt too simple and you didn't put sentences in the right order. But however, I did re-add some things that I reverted from your edit because I found them to be useful. Thanks for the new features though. I'm happy for you to edit more, but please don't simplify sentences too much.Wetbeans (talk)18:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't revert my changes before I can respond.Wetbeans (talk)18:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix your edits.Wetbeans (talk)18:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, sorry if I sound aggressive.Wetbeans (talk)18:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's surprising that they "felt too simple" and weren't "in the right order". I suppose my 25 years' experience as a professional editor hasn't stood me in good stead - as indeed my 18 years as an editor on Wikipedia. But that's OK. I'll have a look at the article again and see if there are any mistakes that need fixing. PS - I'm glad that you are happy for me to edit more, because that's how Wikipedia works. Once a person has written an article, anyone can edit it to improve it. Please checkWP:OWN.Grutness...wha?03:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I probably should've checked it again. I genuinely have no idea why I said it was too simple. I like what you added, and I built off it because it was good. Just re-reverted a couple of things. They weren't major.Wetbeans (talk)04:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S'alright.Grutness...wha?04:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I haven't done this before but have noticed an error in the Valpy-Fulton-Jeffreys family tree - James Fulton and Catherine Valpy Fulton had 7 children (not 6), and the son you called Henry is actually Herbert Valpy Fulton. He was the father of Julius Herbert Fulton (1901-1973) founder (with Bob Hogan) of Fulton Hogan .103.250.118.72 (talk)09:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK - thanks for that. I'll see whether I can change the tree, though it may need redoing in an interactive form (which is beyond me).Grutness...wha?11:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Just to say I have added quite a bit to your Woollaston page.If you have a chance to have a quick look it would be great. Hope it is all ok and thanks for your initial page, there's still a lot of NZ art people without one. Cheers,Manymanydogs (talk)03:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't checked it thoroughly, but it looks good! I'd do more NZ art articles myself, but I write about NZ art for a living, so it feels too much like work :)Grutness...wha?06:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Grutness! On behalf of theBirthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of yoursuccessful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day!The Herald (Benison) (talk)00:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boy do I owe you for fix the name of the Brooke Gifford page. Thanks so much for your continued help. Cheers,Manymanydogs (talk)06:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Manymanydogs: No prob. I keep an eye on NZ art-related articles because I work in the field myself (I review art for the Otago Daily Times).Grutness...wha?10:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lol, you guys can delete my life in 5 seconds, sorry for having fun and talking shit - i am not even average skill level but its fun for me to act cool to myself - lmao77.98.191.8 (talk)00:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you please stop with the mass edits until the discussion about proposed deletion will be over? The use of these categories is unsystematic and they are just a historical relic. Thank you.FromCzech (talk)04:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FromCzech: There is clear evidence that the templates and categories were originally acknowledged for use at WP:WPSS (they are listedhere). There is also clear evidence that they would be useful - the Central Bohemia category is over the limit at which it should be split at WPSS (600 stubs). It seems that simply no-one got round to populating them. All I am doing is using the stub templates as they were intended. If the categories do not measure up to the 60+ stubs needed for each, then they can be upmerged with no prejudice against them being re-created if and when they meet the required 60 stub standard. In any case, the original proposal, of deleting the templates, is flawed. If the templates were malformed or not in accordance to stub sorting practice, they would be deleted, but these would simply be upmerged to the main category anyway. The only real way to tell whether they reach that standard already is to stub them appropriately. As such, I am simply following standard practice for WPSS - and also for CFD, in which there is long-standing tradition that if it can be shown that a category is useful (which in stub-sorting means reaching the 60-stub threshold) it will likely be kept. I will, how3ever, complete the district I am currently working on, and then pause. PS: If they are a historical relic, then they should not be categorised within the permcats for the various districts (e.g.,Category:Populated places in Benešov District) and the whole of the Central Bohemia catalogue tree needs to be changed.Grutness...wha?05:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pause. Only three districts would exceed 65 stubs (Benešov and Kolín being two of them), and the rest are below 60 or have 61–65 stubs and will soon fall below your threshold. From the logic of the matter, it does not make sense that only three districts should be singled out from the whole country so that Central Bohemia could fall below 600. The current number does not make it over-sized. 60 is the bare minimum, but that doesn't mean it has to be blindly followed when it clearly doesn't make sense.FromCzech (talk)05:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It makes perfect sense for three to be singled out if they all fall above threshold. That's the way stub sorting works. You can see upmerged templates in many similar stub categories, just waiting to reach the point where they reach the threshold. If they fall well below the threshold, then they become upmerged; if they later reach the threshold, they get their own categories. Have a look, for instance, atCategory:Bulgaria geography stubs, which has some regions split out because they reached threshold, and more umperged because they haven't. The same is true withCategory:Kazakhstan geography stubs,Category:Ireland geography stubs,Category:Lithuania geography stubs, andCategory:Spain geography stubs. And that's just looking at top level categories, and only at Europe. You're also likely to find that the number of articles - and therefore the number of stubs - grows. At the moment, there's only towns and villages with articles, but sooner or later, it's almost certain that rivers, mountains, lakes, forests, caves, and the like will all get articles.Grutness...wha?05:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remind you result of our discussion (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 16). The CentralBohemian stub ctegory is not overized and the sub-categories should remain empty. I don't understand why you started acting contrary to the compromise of the debate.FromCzech (talk)15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the debate - and I quote - waskeep and populate the templates. As such, I am doing exactly what the CFD discussion decided. And all of the templates currently point to the subcategories. If any of the subcategories fail to reach the required viable number of stubs, then they can be proposed for upmerging, but no categories were proposed for deletion in the previous discussion, so as they are there and the templates are pointing to them, that is where the stubs will go unless they are proposed. WhatI don't understand is why you reverted all the district template use - for instancehere, without mentioning in your edit summaries what you were doing. This was completely contrary to stub-sorting practice and in direct opposition to the decision reached at CFD.Grutness...wha?16:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I didn't notice it was so explicitly stated in the header. But I don't know on what basis, because no one else followed my last post and you were the only one to speak up for their populating. I emptied the category that was full, because I thought that was the agreement. But although the result is there as it is, in my opinion the categories where the number does not reach 60 should not be filled.FromCzech (talk)17:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So far, the only one I've worked on that hasn't has reached 58 so far.Grutness...wha?17:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, the easiest way to tell from here is to populate the templates, as was stated, and then it'll be easy to tell which categories don't meet the target. From there it would be a simple job to propose the categories for deletion and to upmerge the templates for any that are deleted back into the main CBR category. That wouldnot mean changing the template on any of the articles - it would simply mean repointing the template to the parent category.Grutness...wha?17:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As to why that was the decision, of the discussion, it was almost certainly because my argument was based on long-standing practice. Yours wasn't.Grutness...wha?17:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to believe what is "long-standing practice" and what isn't when no one else has gotten too involved in the discussion. E.g. you called the 600 stubs limit as common practice, but that's the limit you stick to, not Wiki policy, which says 800.FromCzech (talk)17:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's been standard practice all the time I've been in the stub-sorting project - which is almost 17 years now. By Wikipedia standards, that's definitely long-standing, and the closing admin clearly understood that, as do most people who've had anything to do with stub sorting.Grutness...wha?18:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I resign, fill the categories out as you plan. But I'm continuously de-stubing articles, so please respect, if the category is under 60 and should be upmerged or whatever you call it.FromCzech (talk)18:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will nominate any category that is too small for deletion. BTW - I looked at quite a few of the articles on Czech villages that weren't marked as stubs, and about half of them should have been. Many of them only had about three or four sentences of text.Grutness...wha?18:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a municipality is small and there is almost nothing, even a few sentences can be an exhaustive description, or at least enough to be on Start level perWikipedia:Content assessment definition.FromCzech (talk)18:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that - please check out myessay on the subject. But in some cases those articles clearly have so little information to not qualify as Start-class.Grutness...wha?01:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Auckland Museum Wiki-Award
		Congrats Grutness! You've received an Auckland Museum Wiki-Award for creating the articles onVictoria Theatre, Devonport, one of the locations on the museum's list of requested articles.Prosperosity (talk)01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you!Grutness...wha?03:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I agree with you fully about the populated place category. Since you have added a new one, I've withdrawn my nomination but I would love for some help to recreate the deleted categories for players from major cities like Monterrey and so on. I tried to in deletion review but nobody agree nor disagreed on recreation. You think its okay to recreate? Especially since the reasons for deletion were incorrect, IMO.Omnis Scientia (talk)09:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Omnis Scientia: I got into a bit of flak for creating categories in the first place. Personally, I think they make sense, though. I'll re-make the Monterrey one but I'll probably stop after that, in case it gets someone's ire up again.Grutness...wha?11:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grutness, I will back you up on it if you do get any ire. It just doesn't make sense to NOT have those while, concurrently, there is a whole tree of sportspeople by city and sport (seeCategory:Sportspeople by sport and populated place).Omnis Scientia (talk)11:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. :)Grutness...wha?11:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Omnis Scientia: There are now eight subcategories. Pretty sure those are the only viable (≥ 5 article) city-level categories for baseball in Mexico.Grutness...wha?12:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grutness, I did a draft on Dignan. Not sure if I may contact you like this... but wondering if you can support with some recent references as the draft is declined. Thanks and regards!Davidindia (talk)05:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Erm... well, I'm flattered. I'm not sure how much I'd be allowed to add. Someone has tried writing an article about me on Wikipedia before which was also turned down... I'm not really sure that I'm notable enough (though I'm working on it :)hereare a couple more possible references though.Grutness...wha?05:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, that's awesome. You aren't allowed to add anything, of course, but can provide references (and photos) for others to do something with, James. I hope you get this over the line,Davidindia. Given that I've never met you, James, I don't think that there's anything wrong with me editing the draft; that's what I've just done (although nothing of any substance). Say if you want me to keep away from it, though.Schwede6607:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Dignan,Wikidata Q126869770Schwede6608:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heh - no, that's fine. :) If it gets over the line, I could easily supply a photo or something.Grutness...wha?11:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that we have a Wikidata item, we’d like a photo regardless 😎Schwede6614:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Okay. This is embarrassing!Here you go. You might want to update the categories on Commons 😎Grutness...wha?16:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Dunedindouble.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why it was removed - it's back in the article now.Grutness...wha?05:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day,Grutness, from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!Have a great day!DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)01:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Grutness...wha?04:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Grutness! On behalf of theBirthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you madeyour first edit and became a Wikipedian!The Herald (Benison) (talk)21:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Grutness...wha?02:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Grutness,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join theTwenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards,The Herald (Benison) (talk)21:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— The Herald (Benison) (talk)21:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - I'll check it out!Grutness...wha?02:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you. I'm a big fan of your work onThe Catlins and I might ask here from a person with some local knowledge of the Otago area. I've begun work on theClutha River article. It's difficult to find content about the course, Māori, and European history in the area, and this is my first attempt at a river article. Prehaps any local history books or newspaper articles might be good sources to use?

Work is still in-progress and I need to find source in the geography section and fix the prose. We'll see how it pans out.Alexeyevitch^(talk)08:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed someone was doing a lot of editing of that article. It's looking good. I can certainly help with copyediting to fix any prose problems. Not sure what books might be useful, but I'll have a look.Grutness...wha?11:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I'll keep you updated. Rivers in the South Island need to have more coverage on Wikipedia.Alexeyevitch^(talk)11:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I'm the person who made the edits to Erskine College that you improved - thank you. I'm still quite a newbie here (inching my way towards my first 500 edits), and I wondered if I could ask an old hand a question about photos? I wrote the pageMavis Wheeler and would like to include a photo. I have identified this one (https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image/?mkey=mw52747) and have been told I can only use it if it's on Wikimedia Commons. With help from another editor with wording, I emailed the National Portrait Gallery, but have had no response. I wonder if I can use it under Fair Use (as the third column on the website seems to indicate)? (I also asked about this at one of the help desks, but it seemed very complicated, and I don't know how to find the answer again). Thanks - I hope this is OK to ask.Blackballnz (talk)08:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Blackballnz: It's fine to ask, but to be honest it's not an area I know much about - almost all of the photos I've uploaded are one I've taken myself. It looks like it's available under a creative commons licence, which I think would make it OK, but it's best to ask at the photo copyright help page (Wikipedia:Media copyright questions) to make sure. Hope that helps.Grutness...wha?11:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I may chip in: the Creative Commons license that they offer is unsuitable as it’s got "NC" (non-commercial) in it. As the subject is dead, "fair use" can be applied. For that, an image will be uploaded to Wikipedia (not to Commons), You can read up on this atWikipedia:Non-free content.Schwede6614:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on a project to improve the Bay of Islands wiki, adding all islands etc. I would like to create a map of the bay of islands so I can show the island locations within the bay of islands.

I believe you may have created the original NZ-Northland plain map. I wondered if you would consider making one for the bay of islands (or could point me in the direction of someone who could).

I have attempted to research how to make them myself, but its a bit above my paygrade!

hope you can help - thanks

Yes, I could probably come up with something. May be a few days though. If you haven't seen anything by early next week, remind me!Grutness...wha?13:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Petersmeter: Hope this does the trick :)Grutness...wha?09:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

excellent. Thank you!Petersmeter (talk)06:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.

Take the surveyhere.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
		For work onSouth Island articles. As a fellow South Islander, I am pleased and honored you made a difference here (e.g.Caversham, New Zealand andThe Catlins).
		this WikiAward was given to Grutness byAlexeyevitch(talk) on11:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch: Thank you (and greetings from Dunedin!)Grutness...wha?11:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexeyevitch — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotesWikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Alexeyevitch^(talk)11:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And a happy new year to you, too,@Alexeyevitch:!

Whitwell, Isle of Wight has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grutness. Thank you for your contributions, including recent edits atList of metonyms. Unfortunately a piece you added as a reference uses the phrase "the Bombay Hills" but does not define it. References need to discuss the metonym as a metonym. SeeUse–mention distinction for discussion of the difference. Happy editing,Cnilep (talk)02:47, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Grutness! On behalf of theBirthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 20th anniversary of yoursuccessful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day!User:Acer-the-Protogen (talk)17:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

20 years? Wow. That's dedication there!! Have a cookie.

(Acer's Communication Receptacle |what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here)16:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :)Grutness...wha?01:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTaipa-Mangonui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taipa-Mangonui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk)20:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WishingGrutness a veryhappy adminship anniversary on behalf of theWikipedia Birthday Committee!DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)06:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness!DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)06:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Grutness...wha?09:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grutness,

In late 2024, I expanded someone else’s Start-class article called Bombardment of Greytown,  which, after some changes by Donner60 and others, was declared a B Level article by Hawkeye7. In the course of the run-up to that B level bestowment, I had received, thanks to my watchlist, no less than 13 email notifications alerting me to changes made, ending on 7 December 2024.

Having received the B Level imprimatur and having ceased to receive any more email alerts as to further activity, I assumed no more changes were being made. But, recently, I glanced at the article, and I noticed substantial additions have been made to it in 2025 by History1138 and a warning template added to the top by you that said, “This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. etc.” Again, my watchlist never alerted me that any of this was happening. Hence, my delay in reaching out to you. (I will also be contacting History1138 soon.)

I looked at the description of what can cause tone problems in an article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles#Tone) and did not see how I might have violated this cautionary. Perhaps you could point out some examples in the piece of such failings. I would also like to know if you can shed any light on how that template was added and those additions made to the article without my watchlist having alerted me by email. I’m guessing it was just some sort of pilot-error on the part of a first-timer.Will-DubDub (talk)17:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Will-DubDub: The main problem is parts like "An obscure and seemingly minor incident in which no one was killed or even injured, this event has had a secret history, hidden — until now — for over a hundred years. And it has had a major impact on American foreign policy for almost as long." It reads like the sort of thing you'd find in clickbait. It may be accurate, but it's not a very encyclopaedic way of putting it - better something more neutral like "Although this incident was minor, it had a major impact on American foreign policy." Reading theough it again, most of it is a good article, but that bit in particular stood out as a red light.

As to the reason why you didn't get alerted, I've no idea - someone over at theWP:Village Pump might be able to answer that one.Grutness...wha?02:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Grutness,

Upon reflection, I think you’re absolutely right about that line, and I just changed it to your suggested alternative.

You have inspired me to seek higher rating levels, including Feature status!

I will check with Village Pump about why my watchlist didn’t inform me of the changes.

Speaking of changes, I’m going to ask Historyguy1138 to remove most of his additions. I think they slow down unnecessarily the run up to the titular incident and make an already long and complicated piece even more so. Also, one line, “Solon Borland . . . was forced to resign,” is incorrect. Borland was severely reprimanded by Secretary of State Marcy and, in a fit of pique, then resigned. “Whether or not Marcy’s note was actually intended to induce Borland’s resignation,” James Woods has written, “it had that effect.” (See Borland’s letter of resignation here: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=txu.059172149398109&seq=439. He was so angry with Marcy that he sent it over his head, directly to President Pierce.)Will-DubDub (talk)16:06, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the best with improving the article! And with finding out what is going on with the notifications!Grutness...wha?02:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hope to start improving on it right away and finding out what’s going on with those notifications! I’ve also been in contact with Historyguy1138, to thrash out some sort of agreement with him about his changes to the article. That said, where does that leave you and I with the tone template warning at the top of the article? Has the change I made to that red light passage satisfied your concerns, so that you’d be willing to take the template down once I come to an agreement with Historyguy1138?Will-DubDub (talk)22:00, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) Once the problem was fixed you could have removed that yourself, though you were right that it was better to have either the person who put it there or an uninvolved editor do that. Good luck with Historyguy1138 :)Grutness...wha?23:58, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Historyguy1138 and I have come to a meeting of the minds over his changes to my B-level expansion of the Bombardment of Greytown.

The changes and additions are now mostly mine, inspired by suggestions from him and approved by him.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Historyguy1138&diff=prev&oldid=1288574147

The bulk of the changes involve my replacing the five initial paragraphs of the Prelude section with five new paragraphs. Then I added four graphs to the end of the article in two new sections: Post Bombardment Central America and Greytown’s Ultimate Fate. (The other changes are much smaller and described in the edit summaries for them.)

Thanks for all your previous help, and I hope you like the changes. I have sent similar notifications to Hawkeye7 and Donner60. Once I’ve heard back from all three of you and resolved any problems you’ve noticed, I am going to embark on an effort to increase the number of images in the article. I will inform you and the others when those additions are complete.Will-DubDub (talk)19:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Will-DubDub: I didn't have an in-depth read of it, but from what I saw it looks very good. I made one minor alteration, in the capitalisation of the headings, which wasn't in line with theWP Manual of Style. Other than that, good work!Grutness...wha?03:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added the new images to this article — 22 of them. Thank you for the help with the headings. I have also alerted Hawkeye7, Historyguy1138, and Donner60.Will-DubDub (talk)21:50, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your move of Belizean feminists from Belizean activists to Belizean women activist. Men can be feminists too.[1]^SMason_Garrison00:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Smasongarrison: Good point.Grutness...wha?01:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

::What are you talking about? None of the other categories are parented by women activists. They're connected to women'srights activists.^SMason_Garrison01:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you must be replying to a deleted message. I double checked and found you were right, hence the change of my message.Grutness...wha?01:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'm glad we were able to clear it up :)^SMason_Garrison02:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Laufiso do your good things to thisNankai (talk)09:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Nankai: Heh. I've added some categories - I'll see what else I can find. I've met Pip Laufiso, who I think is Marie's sister (and would borderline be worth an article herself) - it should be possible to get some info to add to the article.Grutness...wha?15:51, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah pip got a gong recentlyNankai (talk)16:30, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

given the time of day (night) editing gets done the depiction is quite accurateWikipedia MonumentNankai (talk)00:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. I'll have you know I'm always very demure and very mindful while I edit, no matter when it is :)Grutness...wha?01:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLong Island, Bermuda has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved for over 15 years. Small island. Unlikely to find sources due to many islands with similar names. No other language's article has any citations either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)08:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would guarantee it took less time to find references than it did to add a prod to this article and notify me. Perhaps you should try something like that next time, especially since verifiable places are never normally deleted.Grutness...wha?10:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding "Bermuda" to the search eliminates most of the "many islands with similar names".PamD11:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your username featured in the early years. Enjoy!Schwede6603:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!Grutness...wha?03:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I spoke to the kaiwhakahaere today who told me "the old people always said it as one word" so can we change it back?Nankai (talk)02:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^"...so we stick with that."Nankai (talk)03:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - OK. Strange, because most websites seem to use the three-word version.Grutness...wha?07:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

on the above matter their logo uses one word; I guessthey get to decide. Unrelated, if your Grutness would be so good to peruse new articleDhargyey Buddhist Centre, pls look out for conflicts of interest ;)Nankai (talk)23:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would look great with an infobox like the one atcommons ... I thinkUser:DrThneed has done some workNankai (talk)23:09, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons one is built by magic from Wikidata using a template. I added one to the Wikipedia page and entered some info from the Heritage listing. Lovely to have a page for this grand old house, @Nankai!DrThneed (talk)01:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@DrThneed andNankai: Yeah, I'll have a look at that article. I don't know much about the place, though I have visited there a couple of times many years ago. BTW DrT, the reason Nankai comes to me for any mentoring type stuff is I know him through work - I freelance for the newspaper that he's a senior reporter for :)Grutness...wha?04:50, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Had a look, did a bit of copyediting and added a couple of lines - it's looking good - excellent work! BTW, if you're looking for another possible Dunedin subject for an article, I was quite surprised there wasn't one on Richard Hudson...Grutness...wha?05:37, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jones (Bowie) family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Mike Selinker (talk)23:58, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Narrows (Saint Kitts and Nevis) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Narrows (Saint Kitts and Nevis) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iljhgtn (talk)06:41, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I live in the United States. I have never heard anyone say "I am going to see the physician". People here universally say "I am going to see the doctor." I think per common name we should move everything either to Category:Medical doctor, Category:American medical doctors, etc. or actually to even better reflect common name we should move everything toCategory:Doctors (medical);Category:British doctors (medical); Category:French doctors (medical), etc. The common name is not "medical doctor" it is clearly in modern English everywhere "doctor" but since doctor has multiple other meanings, it would be very confusing to use just doctor, but since medical is not part of the common name I think it would most reflect the actual common name to use Doctor (medical). There is the issue that in Britain there are "physicians", but they are a subset of doctors (medical) and not used as a synonym, but I think common use even in the US is such that American doctors (medical) or American medical doctors is the best name for even that category. There are some use differences, but no American would find the proposed name confusing, or even unexpected.John Pack Lambert (talk)13:35, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Makes some sense, but what are they known as collectively in the United States? If they're called physicians rather than doctors, then the usual system (used in probably thousands of categories across Wikipedia) would be to use local usage, even if it varies from nation to nation (see, for instance, the categories for soccer/football/association football). Which is how they are now. If you think the American categories need changing, then propose them instead. "Doctors (medical)" might clear up the mess, but it would be better to run that past any connected WikiProjects before a mass renaming proposal.Grutness...wha?13:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a distinction, at least historically in the UK, between physicians and surgeons, which is why some consultants are referred to as Dr Xyz and others as Mr/Ms Xyz. Seehttps://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/surgical-staff-and-regulation/qualifications-of-a-surgeon/#WhyPamD14:40, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good point.Grutness...wha?14:46, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTurramurra High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turramurra High School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Servite et contribuere (talk)05:54, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Servite et contribuere: Any reason why you're telling me this? To the best of my knowledge I've never seen this article and never heard of the school.Grutness...wha?15:06, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - I see. I put a copyvio notice on this article 19 years ago.Grutness...wha?15:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automatic notice to the creator. And it appears to be youGrutness.Servite et contribuere (talk)22:12, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grutness I used twinkle and gave an automatic notice when using Twinkle.Servite et contribuere (talk)22:11, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Servite et contribuere: I wasn't the creator of it. Earlier versions of it were deleted as copyvios.Grutness...wha?03:32, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grutness Are you an Admin? The earliest version I can see was edited by you. If you are, that might be why it thinks you are the creator of this article.Servite et contribuere (talk)09:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup - been an admin for many a long year (15 years, I think).This was my "creation" of the article. Earlier versions have been removed from the edit history.Grutness...wha?13:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grutness So that might be why you were tagged. I am not an admin and cannot see deleted content. On the page history, the last version I can see was created by you. If an admin had nominated, a different user might have been notified.Servite et contribuere (talk)13:28, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBatali River is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batali River until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk)19:12, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much again for your help. You will always be the person who saved Ted from playing Ruby to me. cheers.

Manymanydogs (talk)18:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! No problem :)Grutness...wha?01:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sportspeople from Dollar, Clackmannanshire has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Kaffet i halsen (talk)18:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Grutness! On behalf of theBirthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you madeyour first edit and became a Wikipedian!CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!)00:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!)00:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! 21 years? How is that possible?Grutness...wha?00:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day,Grutness, from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!Have a great day!DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)15:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Grutness...wha?16:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day,Grutness, from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!Have a great day!NediaWanna talk?Stalk me16:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Grutness...wha?16:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 16 § Category:Mass media in Bautzen on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Kaffet i halsen (talk)14:46, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm being told this why?Grutness...wha?14:50, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedThe bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTrope.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 20 § Mass media in Azerbaijan by city on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Kaffet i halsen (talk)08:22, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 20 § Category:Mass media in Jakobstad on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Kaffet i halsen (talk)15:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 21 § Category:Mass media in Agen on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Kaffet i halsen (talk)11:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAs-Sakn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/As-Sakn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giuliotf (talk)10:35, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAl Ga'da is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Ga'da until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giuliotf (talk)10:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]