User talk:Greywin
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This isGreywin'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
I dream of horses If you reply here, pleaseping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @04:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SeraphWiki (talk)04:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2017 Kandel stabbing attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Kandel stabbing attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.SeraphWiki (talk)04:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Greywin, As per the article above, Bundestag homepage could considered primary source as it is the webpage about the biographies of its elected members. Independent reliable source would be third party source - see hereWP:RS - A newspaper source in any language indicates Erler of such position would do. CASSIOPEIA(talk)21:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSPD party member vote on the 2018 coalition agreement of Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFDP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectEssen Hauptbahnhof (VRR). Since you had some involvement with theEssen Hauptbahnhof (VRR) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Legacypac (talk)22:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2018 Vienna embassy stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Vienna embassy stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.power~enwiki (π,ν)17:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Greywin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,2018 Hamburg stabbing attack, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}Also,be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or onthe article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.
Natureium (talk)18:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProjectWomen in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of theWiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to ourmailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for April: April+Further with Art+FeminismArchaeologyMilitary history (contest)Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | ||
To subscribe:Women in Red/English language mailing list orWomen in Red/international list. To unsubscribe:Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
--Ipigott (talk)08:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isRape cases involving immigrants.The discussion is about the topictopic. Thank you. --Deb (talk)06:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2018 Ellwangen police raid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Ellwangen police raid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.pseudonymJake Brockmantalk08:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFlensburger Tageblatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTarp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
Hi North America, thank you for welcoming me! :)--Greywin (talk)11:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | WP:HEY, nice work expanding, improving articles usingWP:RS.E.M.Gregory (talk)12:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello. It looks like your recent article,Armin Schuster, may be a translation of an article from another language Wikipedia. If this is the case, please make sure you follow thetranslation guidelines, and note that translated articlesmust credit the source article. Thanks,BlackcurrantTea (talk)12:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you persist in adding provocative statements to Wikipedia articles and plugging your own personal view of events in Germany, I will request a topic ban against you.Deb (talk)08:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Greywin, thanks for creatingHubert Aiwanger!
I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It needs more references demonstrating notability. The references are currently mostly about his change of position, or reelection, not specifically abouthim.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.
—Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)21:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2018 German government crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 German government crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Frayæ (Talk/Spjall)17:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAndreas Geisel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGerman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creatingElbbrücken, Greywin!
Wikipedia editorBoleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has entries which don't meetMOS:DABRL orMOS:DABMENTION.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn'stalk page.
Learn more aboutpage curation.
Boleyn (talk)18:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Aggressive, POV-pushing editors often appear to aim to drive new editors off the project by flinging accusations, taking their articles to AfD, and hassling them to death on page after page. The best way to respond is to quietly make well-sourced edits and policy-based arguments. I hope a nice cup of tea helps.E.M.Gregory (talk)10:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Greywin reported by User:NatGertler (Result: ). Thank you.Nat Gertler (talk)15:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mSimonm223. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem verycivil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Simonm223 (talk)15:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pleasestop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.Simonm223 (talk)17:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you makepersonal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.Simonm223 (talk)17:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Greywin. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or anypage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isEdit-warring BLPCRIME violations after warnings and a block.Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)19:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk)20:34, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Greywin(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
never violated BLP policy as everything I wrote was sourced by highly reputableWP:RS likeFrankfurter Allgemeine,Süddeutsche Zeitung and so on!
Decline reason:
Repeated violations ofWP:BLPCRIME are clear.Boing! said Zebedee (talk)20:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.