User talk:Gator1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Gator1 has not edited Wikipediasince May 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
~~~~ at the end. If you do not sign, I may ignore or delete your comments.I archive this page about once a month. Archives can be foundhere.
Nice to see you around here again, sorry about what happened over a year ago, it was a shame, btw I removed the welcome back message from the obvious sock which I blocked, I hope you didn't mind.Secretaccount20:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For having the courage to come back to Wikipedia nearly two years after being harassed off, I hereby present you with theBarnstar of Diligence.TML (talk)04:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] |
I too am glad to see you return...let me know if there is anything you need.--MONGO05:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to see you back!Son of the Defender20:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see you back!One (talk)04:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Testg2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.MBisanztalk18:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onFile:Coon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatantcopyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Bidgee (talk)20:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,Gator1!WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members pagehere. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk)16:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.
Delivered byMessageDeliveryBot on behalf ofXeno (talk) at15:36, 2 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.MessageDeliveryBot (talk)13:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delivered byMessageDeliveryBot on behalf ofXeno (talk) at13:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Following acommunity discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached toprovisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to theWikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per there-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xenotalk14:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Coon.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —ξxplicit22:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You are receiving this message because of arecent change to theadministrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at thebureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only throughWP:RFA. Thank you.MBisanztalk00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your upload ofFile:Belfast sunrise.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructionshere. Thanks!Message delivered byTheo's Little Bot (opt-out)13:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gator1. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gator1. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
