User talk:Galamore
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, I'mDreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added toMaterial flow because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page or take a look at ourguidelines about links. Thank you. –DreamRimmer (talk)15:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. Wewelcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or thingsyou have written about on Wikipedia, you may have aconflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See theconflict of interest guideline andFAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you arerequired by theWikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. SeeWikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.jp×g🗯️06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,Galamore!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!BuySomeApples (talk)16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Thanks for your contributions toHolmes Place. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability,it is promotional and reads like an advertisement andyou may have a possible Conflict of Interest.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Ratnahastin (talk)14:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,GoTo (Israeli company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoTo (Israeli company).
Deletiondiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot votes.Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions isnotability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TheLongTone (talk)15:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore, andwelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see theWikipedia Teahouse.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name ontalk pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see ourhelp pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me onmy talk page or place{{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!Marokwitz (talk)10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toJesse Lyu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Justiyaya13:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
mention me on reply)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onJFrog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.TLA(talk)06:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.jp×g🗯️03:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has beenblocked indefinitely foradvertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation'sTerms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatorypaid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form ofconflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion iscontrary to thepurpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read ourguide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end ofyour user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
Galamore(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The accusation is ridiculous and false. If there is anyone on Wikipedia that I can be exposed to with my name. Let him talk to me and understand that there is no way that I receive money from any company for my edits. I want to keep writing, And I want to keep writing about high-tech companies. Hope someone will read this and help me.Galamore (talk)06:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
There's enough red flags here for me to not disagree with the blocking admin- but even if I did disagree, you are editing so promotionally that it's no different than if you were working for the subjects of your edits. Right now you can't be trusted to edit about companies- if there are other topics that you want to edit about, please tell what those might be; once you do that for awhile and learn more about Wikipedia guidelines, that can be revisited, but I decline to unblock you to edit about companies.331dot (talk)08:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Is it okay to write about people? I can also write about technologies... And be careful not to write about technologies unique to the company so that it won't be advertising...
I readWikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody And I understood why you were so suspicious of me. I don't know how to prove that I'm not related to them. For me, delete the articles I wrote. each and every one of them. I have no sentimental connection and I don't care about the companies themselves. Right, I'm new. But in the last few weeks I read and learned a lot here. I want to continue to be a part.Galamore (talk)06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have read this page and the section about you on an an administrator's noticeboard, and checked your editing history, and here are some of my thoughts on the matter.
I don't know whether you are an undisclosed paid editor or not, but there is nowhere near enough evidence to have persuaded me to block you from editing for that reason. On the other hand, I do think that the promotional character of your editing is enough to justify a block. As far as I know, that promotional character could be because you are being paid to use Wikipedia for advertising, but it could alternatively be simply because, being new to editing Wikipedia, you simply didn't realise that Wikipedia style is to write in a neutral way, without expressing approval or admiration of what one is writing about. What I am about to write is based on the assumption that the second of those two possibilities is true.
Creating new articles is probably the most difficult thing for new editors to do, because there are so many ways in which to fall foul of Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and generally accepted style, which a new editor is unlikely to be aware of. Many new editors who try to launch straight into creating articles therefore have a frustrating and disheartening experience. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have afar better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. It is also a mistake to try to get round the restriction on new editors creating articles by making trivial edits to get autoconfirmed, for at least two reasons. The more important of those reasons is that the block on new editors from creating new articles was introducedto help those editors to avoid problems, by stopping them from rushing in without knowing enough to avoid encountering problems, such as those you have experienced. Evading that block therefore exposes you to the problems it is intended to protect you from.
Assuming that you are a genuine good-faith new editor, not editing for pay, and that you are still interested in contributing to Wikipedia, my advice is to make a new unblock request in which you undertake not to try to create new articles, whether directly or via drafts, for a significant time, perhaps six months. It may also be a good idea to undertake not to write about businesses, but it is important to realise that the question of whether your editing is promotional or not is a totally different matter from the question of what topic you are writing about; promotion of a person, an opinion, or anything else is just as unacceptable as promotion of a business.JBW (talk)18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Galamore(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, I took some time to think. At this time I also saw that the article I createdperplexity.ai had over 10,000 views, which made me realize that what I am doing here is significant. I think I have a lot to contribute, and I ask that you unblock me. If you decide that I am not allowed to write new entries concerning companies, I will respect that. I will start by improving existing articles about technologies, technology companies and people who deal with technology.Galamore (talk)07:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You've already been told this approach won't work.Yamla (talk)10:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Galamore(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, I promise not to deal with commercial companies or anything related to that, I will only edit articles related to education and education in Israel, maybe also about people from Israel's historyGalamore (talk)09:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accept reason:
You have been kept waiting for long enough, and I think in fairness to you this needs to be settled. JPxG has made hundreds of edits since the first timeDeepfriedokra pinged them, and dozens since the second time, but has not responded here, so I assume they have nothing to say. On the basis of the assurances you have given about your future editing intentions, I'm willing to unblock to give you another chance. I hope you will now have a successful time contributing to Wikipedia. 🙂JBW (talk)15:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perplexity.ai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Stuartyeates (talk)09:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageThe Streams Method in the Israeli education, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)14:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership.
Deletiondiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot votes.Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions isnotability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Remsense}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Remsense诉15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageKfar HaRoeh Yeshiva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)07:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore,
Thank you for creatingWeizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences.
I have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:
While some of the references individual prizes are referenced, most of the list elements aren't and we're missing key references describing the details of the prize.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.
Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Klbrain (talk)08:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. Thank you for your work onWeizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences.Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for helpfully creating this page. The main problem is the lack of referencing (and I'm not sure if the Hebrew article helps there either) and, at least for me, several of the references have security warnings or blocks. So, referencing is something to work on, particularly those that focus on the prize rather than the prize winners.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with~~~~.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk)08:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have noticed that you have created this page. However, a page on the topic already exists:2024 Iranian drone attack on Israel. Could you merge content to the original page?AusLondonder (talk)20:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are only allowed to make 1 revert every 24 hours on Arab-Israeli conflict articles.
You have violated this:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Iranian_strikes_in_Israel&diff=1218856099&oldid=1218855967
and then again here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Iranian_strikes_in_Israel&diff=1218858190&oldid=1218858044
Please revert yourself.Supreme Deliciousness (talk)07:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related totheArab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Isaidnoway(talk)08:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation True Promise (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.CycloneYoristalk!09:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Galamore. Could you let me know ifthis edit was made as a result of receiving an email fromDizmonreau? I ask because if it was, there would bepolicy considerations. Best,KevinL (akaL235·t·c)15:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look, there was an ongoing discussion on the talk page when yourself (and the other editor) were making those reverts (both of you breached 1R, btw). Please join that conversation and discuss, the original edit was a good faith effort to resolve some issues (jvl is an unreliable source, btw) so just edit warring (by either of you) isn't going to resolve anything.Selfstudier (talk)21:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Galamore. Thank you for your work onState Education Law (Israel). Another editor,SunDawn, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|SunDawn}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠(contact)14:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Ecrusized (talk)16:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isGalamore. Thank you.Ecrusized (talk)18:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a result of the AE filing against you I am cautioning you against edit warring, which includes continuing long-term edit wars. This is even more important when dealing with an edit war that was targeted by sockpuppets and likely off-wiki canvassing efforts.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)12:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - Wikipedia relies onreliable sources toverify information, especially aboutliving people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to theYehezkel Chazom article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions.GiantSnowman18:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:D-ID (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)04:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shalom Galamore, you are in the news.[4].HaOfa (talk)08:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Press Barnstar | |
| You were mentioned by Al Jazeera for your contributions toNuseirat rescue operation, well done!HaOfa (talk)08:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello, Galamore.
At the top of the protected articleMossad, can you replace the mislabelled term of "the Levant" (because it describes the region encompassing Syria, Lebanon, Hatay province of Turkey, Jordan, and not just Israel) with "British Mandatory Palestine, and later the State of Israel"?
Yours sincerely,Moroike (talk)12:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Statement by Levivich (Nishidani)Levivich (talk)05:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JPxG @331dot @Yamla @JBW @Deepfriedokra
Hello to everyone who has been involved in blocking and unblocking me in the past. Half a year ago I made a commitment not to engage in editing about companies, since then, almost every morning, before I go out to my students, I go to Wikipedia and add a little knowledge from what I can.
I would very much like to come back and write a little about business companies as well. I declare and promise that I do not receive payment from anyone, neither from a commercial company nor from anyone related to them. I simply enjoy reading about the innovations in the world and companies dealing with technologies and I also want to write about them.
Note that the article I wrote at the beginning aboutPerplexity.ai has over a million views! (1,149,005)
It's fun to be a part of Wikipedia, and even if I don't get approved to work in technology, I'm happy to take part in this amazing project.
Do I need to make a formal application?
Galamore (talk)04:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "D-ID".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!03:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onCategory:July 2024 events in Israel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.✗plicit12:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Srugim (website), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)09:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toTiberias Ancient Jewish Cemetery. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources andPer concerns outlined in added tags and on Talk page..I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!11:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text fromhe:ישיבת בני עקיבא כפר הרא"ה toKfar HaRoeh Yeshiva. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensingrequires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in anedit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation andlinking it to the source page. For example:
Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you mustadd attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.Richard Nevell (talk)23:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Holmes Place, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)23:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Srugim".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!08:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still waiting for your talk page response there.Makeandtoss (talk)08:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On 18 September 2024,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2024 Lebanon pager explosions, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.El_C05:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for your creating the article2024 Lebanon pager explosions which was nominated to theIn the News section of themain page in less than 24 hours. In my view, this event marks a significant escalation in the ongoing Middle East conflict and represents the most serious security breach since theAssassination of Ismail Haniyeh, a similar incident which occurred 7 weeks ago in Iran. Congratulations!cyrfaw (talk)12:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi Galamore. Thank you for your work onThe Streams Method in the Israeli education. Another editor,North8000, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for your work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|North8000}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk)20:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
In the2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike article, can you actually display the specific bombMark 84 bomb with its name, which has been obscured in the Wikilink under the label "2,000-pound bombs", when the other bunker buster bombs likeBLU-109 bomb are displayed with their names in the article?
(Also, if units have to be displayed, both the metric and imperial units must be displayed in Wikipedia articles, not one or the other. 95% of the world population use only the metric system.)
Thank you.Oirattas (talk)20:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Galamore! Your additions to2016 Counter-Terrorism Law have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have addedcopyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in thepublic domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under asuitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to preventcopyright andplagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in beingblocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Diannaa (talk)21:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text fromhe:גן החי בפתח תקווה toPetah Tikva Zoo. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensingrequires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in anedit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation andlinking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is givenhere. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attributionmust be given retroactively, for example:
NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.Retroactive attribution may be added using adummy edit; seeRepairing insufficient attribution.It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you mustadd attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.GreenLipstickLesbian (talk)23:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Jesse Lyu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)14:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use theUnblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Galamore(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I think people here have known me for quite a while. At first, I was blocked for writing about commercial companies, and I committed not to do that again. Now I’m being blocked based on the ridiculous claim that I’m someone else? Does that seem reasonable to you? My name is Gal, and if necessary, I’m willing to have a conversation and reveal my identity. A phone call, video call, whichever way you prefer. Look at what I’ve done here over the past year, I’ve created many articles on various topics, mostly related to Israel, the place where I live.
I’m not ashamed of being Israeli.
I am asking that my block be reconsidered.
It appears that this Icewhiz stopped contributing in 2019, and I joined long after that.I enjoy being here and feel that I am contributing. I show my students the things I write and hope that one day they will also start editing on Wikipedia.Please don’t take this from me.Galamore (talk)07:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural, now locked.Izno (talk)14:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.