User talk:FunkyFly
Page contents not supported in other languages.
/Archive1/Archive2/Archive3/Archive4/Archive5/Archive6
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]
It has no Bulgarian influences, until you prove otherwise with references. Respect other people's hard work. --Bonina22:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, if something is not referenced it should be omitted. Your logic is non existent. Sure they are similar, but both Macedonian and Bulgarian cuisines were influenced by others. Not by each other. --Bonina23:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lookup consensus. It's not a consensus because I do not consent. Now, all of a sudden I want Macedonian cuisine to be influenced by Japanese, Yemenite, and Sudanese cuisine. Wanna go with that? --Bonina23:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All mutual Macedonian and Bulgarian foods are either Turkish (which in turn is Middle Eastern influenced) or they are all over the Balkans and we can fight for ages over who invented them. Its accurate to say that it is similar, but not influenced. Take your nationalist tendencies elsewhere please. --Bonina23:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You provide that there is, otherwise it should be omitted. By the way, how come you did not write that there is a Serbian influence. They have all the same food as we do? Or you wouldnt know anything about Macedonian cuisine? --Bonina23:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for support. --AdrianTM19:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Truly He has! Thank you Funky, and many happy returns!NikoSilver11:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My edits about Sveti Kliment are sourced, see the discussion page of the article.— Precedingunsigned comment added byMartin taleski (talk •contribs)
No sources for bulgarian origin as well!
Martin taleski20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You continue to edit war despite prior blocks for the problem. Furthermore, six reverts in two days, three each in 15 minute spurts, atClement of Ohrid, indicates not just an unwillingness to pursuedispute resolution rather than fighting, but also an attempt to game theWP:3RR. You must engage in polite discussion and mediation in future conflicts, or the blocks will escalate.Dmcdevit·t09:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick note to say I don't like your sig. Too garish and aggressive, result is too outstanding on the page. My POV, of course. --maf02:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Arequest for mediation has been filed with theMediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request atWikipedia:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer toWikipedia:Mediation.There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
 | ARequest for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage,Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid. This message delivered byMediationBot, an automated bot account operated by theMediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, pleasecontact the Mediation Committee directly. |
Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in thecurrently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion15:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,Image:FunkyStalin.gif, has been listed atWikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Calliopejen1 (talk)12:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. The nominated article isPrespa e Vogël and Golloborda. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see alsoWikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda. Please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by abot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk)01:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Kniga donski.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
Thank you.DASHBot (talk)05:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedAleksandar Donski, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Donski. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat •(Many otters •One bat •One hammer)01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
