User talk:Enterprisey/Archive 6
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This is anarchive of past discussions withUser:Enterprisey.Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on thecurrent talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
For some reason, I'm not considered a bot op in your table. Have you also considered updating every 30 minutes, or even 15 minutes?—cyberpowerChat:Online17:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Done.Enterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)04:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RemindMeBot has been approved for trial, please see the BRFA page. —xaosfluxTalk13:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Someone has markedWikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/APersonBot 9 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks!AnomieBOT⚡14:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
RemindMeBot, 1 day, testing.Enterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)03:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
@RemindMeBot: 1 dayEnterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)15:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey, I noticed when looking atmy AfD stats that I'm marked as having !voted to keepTsonga Wikipedia (AfD), which is odd as I was its nominator and I didn't withdraw my nomination. So anyway, I thought I should bring it to your attention. Cheers,Graham (talk)02:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Could you please redo the list that you generated atWikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2016_February_12 of the values for the type field in the infobox fraternity? If possible I'd like more information, specifically the list of which pages had what rather than just combining the entries with their counts. Also, please let me know if this can be done in a tool that I'd like have access to including quarry, awb or a search query through insource. Since the list is long, if you could just drop that in a user subpage and let me know the name. Thank You.Naraht (talk)16:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Doing...Enterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)03:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Pull quote.Legobot (talk)04:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Your bot seems to have stalled in updated the bot requests table. Just a heads up.—cyberpowerChat:Online16:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:1.Legobot (talk)04:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry if I seem out of touch but do I understand there's now a bot that archives this every Sunday? If so it doesn't seem to have done it yet today, and I need to add a recently promoted FA to the new week... Tks/cheers,Ian Rose (talk)12:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Very late response (I've been absent for a few months), but sure, no problem. Out of curiosity, do you still remember which backlogged clean-up category it was in? That way, when I get around to editing that userspace essay again, I can avoid dumping it straight back into it.
AddWittyNameHere (talk)19:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
|category=no, which tells the template not to populate it for that page. Originally, it was supposed to populate it for redlinks, etc; however, the cleanup category needs burning down, and I plan to take out the category when it's done.Enterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)20:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Sometimes, interrupting boring, repetitive work by doingother boring, repetitive work works almost as well as doing something not-boring, anyway. XDAddWittyNameHere (talk)21:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello.You havea new message at Kudpung's talk page.01:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello.You havea new message at Kudpung's talk page.02:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Manual of Style.Legobot (talk)04:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi again and sorry for writing here instead of making a pull request. Would you be able to add the following delsort page:Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Archaeology, categorised under "Topical"? Thanks.Uanfala (talk)11:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
DoneEnterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)02:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Jane Austen.Legobot (talk)04:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi — just a moment ago I found out about the AfD Statistics Tool and gave it a try. It seemed to mostly list the correct answers for me, but I noticed that for this AfD:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childhood Domestic Violence it lists my vote as "Keep" for some reason.Mr. Magoo (talk)11:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey, first, thanks for looking after the afd tool, i use it heaps! now the plz help bit:)) i add afd lists to lots of afds in addition to adding "comments", "keeps", and "deletes", but sometimes the afd tool attributes a previous editor's "k" or "d" to me ie.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Owens, i tried adding a "clear all" (sorry i am not computer language literate at all, more a "try it and see"), but that doesn't seem to have worked, are you able to assist? thanks,
Coolabahapple (talk)05:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
FixedEnterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)05:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Coolabahapple (talk)15:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Route diagram template.Legobot (talk)04:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to request thatNew Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments atNew pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)17:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.
Just to recap:
You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)17:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
APersonBot seems to be making errors computing its summary ofWikipedia:Bot requests. It seems to be lumping all but the last two requests into the first one, producing only three entries in the table.Pppery(talk)18:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
<big>...</big> tags, which goes againstWP:SIGAPP. --Redrose64 (talk)09:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Hi, there seems to be a problem withUser:APersonBot/BOTREQ status. Did the bot stop working?Jc86035 (talk •contribs)Use{{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me02:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Enterprisey. It has been over six months since you last edited yourArticles for Creation draft article submission, "Liberators".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}} or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.JMHamo (talk)21:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't use git often. How do Iit or prevent it from happening in the future? — JJMC89 (T·C)22:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
You don't have to do anything about it, because I can squash everything together into one commit from the GitHub web interface; however, other open-source projects are often much more particular about clean commit histories (Linux comes to mind). If you're interested,git rebase (particularly the-i option) is a tool often used to rewrite commit histories in this way.Enterprisey (talk!)22:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey, I've movedTemplate:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/BLD toTemplate:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Backlog elimination drives. The page at the previous location attempted to target a subgroup atWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/BLD, which seems to have never been created or used. Currently, the editnotice now targetsWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Backlog elimination drives, which was a reasonable guess on my part as to what the editnotice would be used for.
If you intend for the page to target a group of pages, let me know, but otherwise, the group notice had 0 visibility on the project, and shouldnot be moved back to its former name. Any questions, let me know. — Andy W. (talk · ctb)20:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! "ReminderBot" section has 118 replies in table... I didn't count actual replies, but that's alittle bit too much :) --Edgars2007(talk/contribs)17:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Democratic Party (United States)/meta/color.Legobot (talk)04:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Democratic Party (United States)/meta/color.Legobot (talk)04:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Here's a few ideas for your fineAFCRHS that may make reviewing atWikipedia:AFC/Redirects even easier. —Sam SailorTalk!09:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
}, { label: 'None', selected: true, value: 'none' Done, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC) }, { label: 'R to related topic', value: 'R to related topic' Done, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Done, and it works, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC).append('From: ' + toarticle + ' (<small><a href=http://www.google.com/search?q=' + encodeURIComponent(toarticle) + '+-wikipedia.org">Google</a>' +to
.append('From: ' + toarticle + ' (<small><a href=http://www.google.com/search?q=' + "encodeURIComponent(toarticle)" + '+-wikipedia.org>Google</a>' + FixedEnterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)21:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Thank you —Sam Sailor (Talk)22:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC) Done, thanks. —Sam Sailor (Talk)20:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Could the strings from the "Reason: " line and the "Source (if applicable): " line be parsed? Looking e.g. like this in the reviewing panel:
Reviewing AfC redirect requests
—Sam SailorTalk!06:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Done, thanks. —Sam Sailor (Talk)20:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)But they show up like
Could they show up like
RefSpecial:Permalink/738428539#Redirect request: Jawaani Lay Doobi. —SamSailor23:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Currently we have a request forCategory:Centrist parties in South America andCategory:Centrism in South America. The latter is aWikipedia:Container category. Would there be a way to, say, if you select Accept to a cat request, then you get a "Tick the box if this is acontainer category" followed by a box to tick off, and then{{Container category}} would be added to the category created? —Sam Sailor (Talk)22:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Here I wanted to append a msg not to requester, but to an admin who should re-salt the redirect. That's a rare situation, of course. Should we drop the automatically added dot/full stop? —SamSailor14:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
). Maybe it's a template thing?Enterprisey (talk!)04:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)if (redirect.comment !== '') { acceptcomment += ': ' + redirect.comment + '. ';Could you make the linked target in "Redirect(s) to <Target title>" open in a new tab? —SamSailor19:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
DoneEnterprisey (talk!)04:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Works for me, thanks. —SamSailor14:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Here we have (Special:Permalink/738852669#Redirect request: Boogey Ball) a{{R to section}} request. If possible, upon choosing R to section in the "Template to append:" drop-down box, a new "Section name in target article:" box where you could enter
(or whatever the section name is), ending up with the redirect looking like
#REDIRECT [[Tiger Electronics#Boogey Ball]]{{Rcat shell|{{R to section}}}}would be a nice feature. —SamSailor14:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey Enterprisey. Iremoved the below from myglobal.js. Since the deployment train last week (Thursday here at enwiki) it has been causing other scripts and gadgets to not load consistently/correctly. Is there any chance you would know how to fix it or know what broke?
// Make red links not open in edit mode$(function(){var$alinks=mw.util.$content.find('a.new').each(function(i,aa){aa.href=aa.href.replace(/[?&]action=edit/,'');});});
Thanks. — JJMC89 (T·C)22:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Here's a few ideas for your fineAFCRHS that may make reviewing atWikipedia:AFC/Redirects even easier. —Sam SailorTalk!09:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
}, { label: 'None', selected: true, value: 'none' Done, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC) }, { label: 'R to related topic', value: 'R to related topic' Done, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Done, and it works, thanks. —Sam SailorTalk!06:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC).append('From: ' + toarticle + ' (<small><a href=http://www.google.com/search?q=' + encodeURIComponent(toarticle) + '+-wikipedia.org">Google</a>' +to
.append('From: ' + toarticle + ' (<small><a href=http://www.google.com/search?q=' + "encodeURIComponent(toarticle)" + '+-wikipedia.org>Google</a>' + FixedEnterprisey (talk!) (formerlyAPerson)21:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Thank you —Sam Sailor (Talk)22:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC) Done, thanks. —Sam Sailor (Talk)20:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Could the strings from the "Reason: " line and the "Source (if applicable): " line be parsed? Looking e.g. like this in the reviewing panel:
Reviewing AfC redirect requests
—Sam SailorTalk!06:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Done, thanks. —Sam Sailor (Talk)20:52, 17 August 2016 (UTC)But they show up like
Could they show up like
RefSpecial:Permalink/738428539#Redirect request: Jawaani Lay Doobi. —SamSailor23:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Currently we have a request forCategory:Centrist parties in South America andCategory:Centrism in South America. The latter is aWikipedia:Container category. Would there be a way to, say, if you select Accept to a cat request, then you get a "Tick the box if this is acontainer category" followed by a box to tick off, and then{{Container category}} would be added to the category created? —Sam Sailor (Talk)22:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Here I wanted to append a msg not to requester, but to an admin who should re-salt the redirect. That's a rare situation, of course. Should we drop the automatically added dot/full stop? —SamSailor14:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
). Maybe it's a template thing?Enterprisey (talk!)04:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)if (redirect.comment !== '') { acceptcomment += ': ' + redirect.comment + '. ';Could you make the linked target in "Redirect(s) to <Target title>" open in a new tab? —SamSailor19:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
DoneEnterprisey (talk!)04:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Works for me, thanks. —SamSailor14:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Here we have (Special:Permalink/738852669#Redirect request: Boogey Ball) a{{R to section}} request. If possible, upon choosing R to section in the "Template to append:" drop-down box, a new "Section name in target article:" box where you could enter
(or whatever the section name is), ending up with the redirect looking like
#REDIRECT [[Tiger Electronics#Boogey Ball]]{{Rcat shell|{{R to section}}}}would be a nice feature. —SamSailor14:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey Enterprisey. Iremoved the below from myglobal.js. Since the deployment train last week (Thursday here at enwiki) it has been causing other scripts and gadgets to not load consistently/correctly. Is there any chance you would know how to fix it or know what broke?
// Make red links not open in edit mode$(function(){var$alinks=mw.util.$content.find('a.new').each(function(i,aa){aa.href=aa.href.replace(/[?&]action=edit/,'');});});
Thanks. — JJMC89 (T·C)22:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Special:UnusedCategories.Legobot (talk)04:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Templates for discussion.Legobot (talk)04:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs.Legobot (talk)04:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for maintaining this tool, I use it a lot. I do have a question about the accounting of MERGE. MERGE is considered as NOT matching the result. I guess that makes some sense in theory, but from my recent experience it does seem to work that well.
For example,Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hair_serum was closed as merge, but later an editor who attempted the merge decided there was no properly sourced info to actually merge to the target so instead did a REDIRECT (which would have been a match).
Another example isWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bahía_del_Duque also closed as MERGE, where the intent was to delete the article and just add the subject into a list. I think the result here is much closer to DELETE than to KEEP.
My concern here is that I nominated two articles for deletion, and they were for all practical purposes deleted although the discussions were closed as MERGE, and my stats show a higher percentage of non-matching votes that I think they should.
I don't know if this has been discussed before anywhere. And I'm not sure how often things like this happen with MERGE or if these two cases are an anomaly. But if this is prevalent, maybe MERGE should be considered like NO CONSENSUS (yellow) - because there is obviously no automated way to delve in deeper.MB15:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for maintaining this tool, I use it a lot. I do have a question about the accounting of MERGE. MERGE is considered as NOT matching the result. I guess that makes some sense in theory, but from my recent experience it does seem to work that well.
For example,Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hair_serum was closed as merge, but later an editor who attempted the merge decided there was no properly sourced info to actually merge to the target so instead did a REDIRECT (which would have been a match).
Another example isWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bahía_del_Duque also closed as MERGE, where the intent was to delete the article and just add the subject into a list. I think the result here is much closer to DELETE than to KEEP.
My concern here is that I nominated two articles for deletion, and they were for all practical purposes deleted although the discussions were closed as MERGE, and my stats show a higher percentage of non-matching votes that I think they should.
I don't know if this has been discussed before anywhere. And I'm not sure how often things like this happen with MERGE or if these two cases are an anomaly. But if this is prevalent, maybe MERGE should be considered like NO CONSENSUS (yellow) - because there is obviously no automated way to delve in deeper.MB15:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default.Legobot (talk)04:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
I like your idea about limitingDraft:Stubs for creation to be about generating lists ofWP:RS per topic. It makes the proposed project more focused, and provides a useful step betweenWP:RA andWP:AFC. --1Wiki8........................... (talk)07:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates.Legobot (talk)04:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates.Legobot (talk)04:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for joining the The future of NPP and AfC Work Group
There have been been recent discussions and some special task pages have been created. for your attention and input. Please visit the following pages to get up to speed and add your comments, particularly the straw polls and priority lists. Please also add these pages to your watchlist.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)10:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for joining the The future of NPP and AfC Work Group
There have been been recent discussions and some special task pages have been created. for your attention and input. Please visit the following pages to get up to speed and add your comments, particularly the straw polls and priority lists. Please also add these pages to your watchlist.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)10:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi -- could you let me know if you have had any time to work onthis, or if you're planning to? I ask because I've been mulling over tracking these numbers manually, which would be a lot of work; of course I don't want to do that if there's a possibility that FACstats might happen in the next two or three months. Thanks --Mike Christie (talk -contribs -library)16:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Seethis diff - for some reason it went and found a template call that was unrelated to anything, removed the template call, and...replaced it with "http://$3". I imagine this has something to do with finding thenth template after the references section, and replacing it with another template, but preserving its parameters. But clearly there are no safeguards :)
Just a note, I doubt this will be an issue in the future, but in case it was a sign of nastier problems on the horizon, I thought I would highlight it for you. --MarkTraceur (talk)14:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Dynamic a-list.Legobot (talk)04:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Following up from the consensus reachedhere, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate inthis discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)12:40, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:1.Legobot (talk)04:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Special:UnusedCategories.Legobot (talk)04:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, It's now been three weeks since we created the NPP Work Group and we are hoping for a dynamic push forward for the urgent updates and required improvements to the quality control of new pages.
We now have the attention of the WMF and their development team has made page patrolling a top priority. They are already working hard to address some of the major issues.
The success of this depends on our team being able to keep the developers supplied with the feedback they need - if we relax on this they will move on.
If you have not already done so, please complete your list of10 preferenceshere as soon as possible from the list atTo do - the WMF is waiting for our shortlist. Please note that No.8 (NOINDEX) has already been addressed.
Thanks for all your help.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Read this in another language •Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.
You can read and help translatethe user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, theVisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is availablein Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week atmw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Theircurrent priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as abeta feature, and improving language support.
The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10"Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested atthe feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, includingThai,Burmese andAramaic.
The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in ageneral status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.
17:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Deferred changes/Request for comment 2016.Legobot (talk)04:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Nothing Was the Same.Legobot (talk)04:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey,
The future of NPP and AfC:
Thanks.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey Enterprisey, I'mThe Phase Master (talk). I think thatTemplate:Vandalism information, managed by APB is stuck. It hasn't been updated since 5:01 AM CDT to me. Is something wrong? --The Phase Master (talk)14:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
RegardingUser:APersonBot/BOTREQ status, how does it know who is a BotOp? Does it check for the userbox template? Or do you do it manually? If manually, perhaps it would be easy to look atWikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Approved_requests? Cheers,Dat GuyTalkContribs20:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the bot seems to think that most of the last quarter of the page is all in the "Hatnote templates" section. Could you fix this? Thanks,Jc86035 (talk)Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me08:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:30, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
Cas Liber (submissions)
MPJ-DK (submissions)
Adam Cuerden (submissions)In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Calvin999 (submissions) produced 2 FLs in R2
SSTflyer (submissions) produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
Cyclonebiskit (submissions) and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
Dharmadhyaksha (submissions) and
Muboshgu (submissions), each with 5 ITN, both in R4.Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.Sturmvogel 66 (talk ·contribs ·email),Figureskatingfan (talk ·contribs ·email), andGodot13 (talk ·contribs ·email)
 Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 4thGA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing ofGood article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 4th GA Cup will begin onNovember 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at theFAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from3family6,Figureskatingfan,Jaguar,MrWooHoo, andZwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you toKrishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name toour mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants. |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016.Legobot (talk)04:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
APersonBot has not updatedTemplate:Vandalism information since November 12, even though it has editedUser:APersonBot/BOTREQ status several times in the past few days.--My Chemistry romantic (talk)08:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey,
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
Since July there has been a very serious backlog atSpecial:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
AlthoughNew Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right atWP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page atWP:NPR andthe new tutorial.
(Sent to all active AfC reviewers)MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onMediaWiki talk:Common.css.Legobot (talk)04:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Is the tool down, or the system just slow in replicating? I contributed toAFD William A. Whiting about 15 hours ago, and nothing shows up using the AFD Stats tool.— Maile (talk)13:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.
The Challenge series – Current drives | ||
|---|---|---|
| Africa |  | |
| Asia | ||
| Europe | ||
| Latin America/Caribbean | ||
| North America | ||
| UK and Ireland | ||
| 1000 Challenges by topic | ||
Hello, Enterprisey. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Asiatic lion.Legobot (talk)04:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Enterprisey, I suggest adding a feature to where it searched the current AfD nomination to be sure its not creating duplicate delsort(s) on the appropriate WP sort page --ⓏⓟⓟⓘⓧTalk21:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place atWikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)13:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onMediaWiki talk:Sidebar.Legobot (talk)04:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Enterprisey. I had a quick query regarding the Afd Stats tool. In myAFD Stats' summary, my !vote for the AfdWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy is shown asDelete, while I only re-listed the said Afd once. Why might this be so? I'm also pingingΣ on this. Irrespective of this query, thanks for the tool. It provides a brilliant summary.Lourdes13:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Enterprisey. Based on your experience, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them aspatrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at theNew Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, youmust read the new tutorial atNew Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the variousdeletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread atpage reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)00:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Just curious what bot task was written in Ruby? :)—MusikAnimaltalk01:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs.Legobot (talk)04:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion.Legobot (talk)04:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox single.Legobot (talk)04:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) onThursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. SeeBBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :)(user:Kudpung forNPR.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Enterprisey, andwelcome to STiki! Thank you foryour recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over atthe STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks!West.andrew.g (developer) andVanamonde (talk)14:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC) |  |
Note: Having a username changeafter you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on thetalk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
Vanamonde (talk)14:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox officeholder.Legobot (talk)04:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Your bot account was recently renamed to match your main account, but still editsUser:APersonBot/BOTREQ status, which is under the old username. This should not be the case, and the bot should instead editUser:EnterpriseyBot/BOTREQ status, while the other page should just remain a redirect.GeoffreyT2000 (talk,contribs)00:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Heyo, I was wondering if you might happen to know of a page where it shows the AFC helpers and how long it's been since they've edited. I remember looking at one a year (two?) ago but I can't for the life of me find it in any of my various logs and chat histories. Thought you might have a clue about it. If not, no worries!Primefac (talk)00:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Enterprisey: Enjoy theholiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expandWikipedia. Cheers,North America100015:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
%2c_cropped.jpg)
Hello Enterprisey: Enjoy theholiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expandWikipedia. Cheers,Class455 (Merry Christmas!)16:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I understand your reasoning for requesting me to add this stub (perhaps) to the article on greenhouse gases. This content I feel is more related to the sociology of climate science rather than the hard science (as the greenhouse gas page is), and I anticipate it will be expanded on by the team of educators who work in this area. I think it is important to maintain the links to the science and would strive to add a section into the greenhouse gas page to link to this one. This metaphor is being spread as a way to understand the effect of CO2, and I feel that if people were to find it on wikipedia then they would be much more able to ground their information on this page than wading through the main article. If that make sense to you then please put the page up, if not I will try harder to convince you!
ThanksChalkyChalky (talk)11:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)ChalkyChalky
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Cold War.Legobot (talk)04:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice on improving the content of the page regarding notability. I have added references and submitted the page for another review, but don't know whether or not you received it. I don't mean to rush you, but just want to know if I'm on the list. Thanks for all you've done to make Wikipedia so valuable.Dalewiehoff (talk)18:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC) Dalewiehoff 12-19-2016
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently adiscussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~Rob13Talk15:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing youSeasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere'sSolstice orChristmas,Diwali,Hogmanay,Hanukkah,Lenaia,Festivus or even theSaturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox country at games.Legobot (talk)04:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 | |
The 12 Days of Wikipedia |
Hello Enterprisey: Enjoy theholiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expandWikipedia. Cheers,JustBerry (talk)23:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg)
Hello, Enterprisey. It has been over six months since you last edited yourArticles for Creation draft article submission, "Resources and Conservation Act".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}} or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.1989 (talk)13:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Enterprisey,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk |stand clear of the doors!)17:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi! Thank you for your constructive comments about the proposed wikipedia page on MIRT.I have edited the page to add a dozen links to places where the toolbox is cited.In most of those cases the author is referencing MIRT(often called "Fessler image reconstruction toolbox" - an old informal name people made up).Most of the new links are discussing but not actually using MIRT,so I hope that counts as stronger evidence of its notability.
In my view this toolbox is quite similar to "Octave" which is a general-purpose software toolthat has a very long wikipedia page. Octave is software that many people use and it is helpfulto have a wikipedia page about it. MIRT is not as famous as Octavebut still lots of people use it and have referred to it.
Can you please let me know whether the references added are sufficient,or do I need to add more? There are about 3000 google hits when I search for this toolboxso I could keep adding more but would that really improve the page? Thanks!
Hello Enterprisey, your appear to have !voted twice on this RfA, your second !vote was indented. —xaosfluxTalk03:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was looking through yourtools on wmflabs (quite useful, by the way!), and I was wondering about the criteria for determining the lists of users onthe recently active users tool. Does recent mean in the past 24 hours? Are there any other criteria? Thanks,Icebob99 (talk)15:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Done.Enterprisey (talk!)18:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)(moved barnstar to awards page)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism.Legobot (talk)04:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox.Legobot (talk)04:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
I know that you are a busy wikipedian, but could you help me in my attempts to create a working bot? I would like it to welcome new users to wikipedia. I am fairly new to python, and I use OS X. Thank you.FriyMan (talk)21:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox person.Legobot (talk)04:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploadingFile:RuneScape spammers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Your BRFA,Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/EnterpriseyBot 10 has been approved. Happy editing, —xaosfluxTalk05:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
(moved barnstar to awards page)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox song.Legobot (talk)04:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
As you are a member of the above task force we're just letting you know about an up coming election for two coordinators for theNew Page Review System. Full details atNew Page Review Coordinators
If you no longer wish to receive messages from this project, you may opt outhere.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)12:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the documenton mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks,m:User:Melamrawy (WMF),09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
| Wednesday February 15, 7pm:WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join theWikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" eveningsalon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop atBabycastles gallery by 14th Street /Union Square in Manhattan. Featuring special guest presentations onWikiProject La Guardia and Wagner Archives,WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of Art,Wiki Loves the Dominican Republic, and more. We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from theFree Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk)22:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC) P.S. Get ready now forBlack WikiHistory Month Weekend:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name fromthis list.)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga.Legobot (talk)04:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I changed your script a bit to edit the favicon of the site as well. How should I credit you on the derivative script?Chico Venancio (talk)06:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace.Legobot (talk)04:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I would like you to delete/suppress section 1.10 and 1.11 of this archive page because I don't like it and it is indexed:here15:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
HelloPrimefac, with all those errors it appears in the 1st page of a search engine and it links to my other accounts.00:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators has now begunHERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. The coordinators will do their best for for the advancement of the improvement of NPP and AfC and generally keep tracks on the development of those things. Coordinators have no additional or special user benefits, but they will be 'go to' people and will try to keep discussions in the right places. This very much involves this project too, especially with growing renewed interest around the site about whatWP:ACTRIAL was all about.
Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
Discuss this messagehere. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthis list.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
Administrator changes
Amortias •Deckiller •BU Rob13
Ronnotel •Islander •Chamal N •Isomorphic •Keeper76 •Lord Voldemort •Shereth •Bdesham •Pjacobi
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Bot policy.Legobot (talk)04:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTemplate talk:Infobox single.Legobot (talk)04:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
| Saturday March 11:Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA | |
|---|---|
  Join us at the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at theMuseum of Modern Art, 4 West 54th Street, on Saturday, March 11, 2017 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. for an all-day communal updating of Wikipedia entries on subjects related to art and feminism. There will be childcare, snacks, multiple trainings and panel discussions. People of all gender identities and expressions welcomed and encouraged to attend. This year’s edit-a-thon kicks off at 10:00 a.m. with a conversation about information activism with writer Joanne McNeil and Data & Society Research Institute Fellow Zara Rahman, moderated by Kimberly Drew, the social media manager for the Metropolitan Museum of Art, creator of the Tumblr “Black Contemporary Art,” and the person behind @museummammy on Instagram. Afternoon breakout groups will engage in focused discussions about related issues, including intersectionality and librarianship, power structures in notability guidelines on Wikipedia, and radical archives. --Pharos (talk)18:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC) And a broader calendar of events on the theme this week/weekend, and the next:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name fromthis list.)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs.Legobot (talk)04:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Enterprisey. I would like to request an opt-out to yourrecently active tool. I've started to notice over the past few weeks that as soon as I'm making an edit, I'm getting pings on IRC. While yes, this could be because these people have a bot with RC setup, I think part of the cause is this tool as someone told me about the tool today. Just because I am seen editing onwiki, does not mean that I have the time or the energy to deal with the requests, especially when they relate to my functionary tools. When I get these pings, they tend to take an hour or two out of my day, and then people who see me respond to that will have their own requests that they found a few hours ago, but never raised.
The simple solution would be if people stopped being lazy and took things to the appropriate venue onwiki to handle, especially in any complicated tasks. But I understand I can't move mountains. I've requested that people take things onwiki, but people just seem to drop the matter as if they don't care and don't wish to do the leg work at all, instead of taking it onwiki. This then forces me to find time later to actually, look, give them what they need, in which they thank me for. I do this because otherwise it means a blocked user escapes, or someones personal information is posted online. Meanwhile this just increases my stress and to do list. --Amanda(aka DQ)06:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Done. Added DQ to the blacklist and accepted Czar's pull req.Enterprisey (talk!)20:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)| Sunday March 26:Action=History Wiki-Hackathon @ Ace Hotel | |
|---|---|
 On the last Sunday of every month, the Boardroom atAce Hotel New York hosts Action Equals History — a unique opportunity for New Yorkers to learn hands-on in a technology training/workshop session about the mechanics, practices and benefits of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects. This is an opportunity for all to gather, share and work collectively towards a more robust account of history. For this month, and following on the recentArt+Feminism campaign, we'll focus on building betteredit-a-thon tools for a variety of different thematic campaigns, and user-testing them with the community. Towards a goal of advancing these tools for wider use with diverse local groups.
Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk)05:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name fromthis list.)
Weird hiccup in here somewhere. Re AFD BKF, yesterday my Keep registered immediately on theAFD stats tool. Today, the AFD does not show at all when I run the tool for my name. But on a random check other editors contributions on that AFD do. Oddball stuff.— Maile (talk)12:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Bot policy.Legobot (talk)04:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (proposals).Legobot (talk)04:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
