This user may have left Wikipedia. EZ1234 has not edited Wikipediasince 13 June 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello EZ1234 just a point about your inclusion of flags in airline infoboxes, the project consensus is not to include them, you are welcome to comment atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines.MilborneOne (talk)15:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are cordially invited to join theAviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

As you have shown an interest inAeroflot we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject.

You might like to take an extra interest in ourAirlines subproject

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!РоссавиаДиалог18:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad to hear that! --Eurocopter (talk)11:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've remarked your interest in various military history - related articles and I thought you might want to join our project. Please feel free toadd your name to this list if you would like to join theMilitary history Wikiproject; you are also encouraged to participate in any of ourtask forces that might interest you. Cheers, --Eurocopter (talk)12:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to theMilitary history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Ournavigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• Theannouncement and open task box is updated very frequently. You canwatchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including{{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project'smain discussion page; it is highly recommended that youwatchlist it.
• The project has severaldepartments, which handlearticle quality assessment,detailed article and content review,writing contests,article logistics, and other tasks.
• We have a number oftask forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed astyle guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are manyarticles that need attention.
• The project has astress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of theproject coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!Kirill08:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for all your great contributions. PerWP:MILMOS#Flags, we do not use flags in the infoboxes of weapons; after all they add nothing at all that the country name does not already give. Best wishes, --John (talk)19:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the question I dont think the project actually came to a consensus on infobox flags although the feeling was that they were not necessary in infoboxes. The only concensus was not to include them in destination lists. I will bring it up again at the project but it is not always easy to get a clear consensus.MilborneOne (talk)12:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheApril 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)00:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are working on this, and I'd like to say that the whole list thing is in bad need of rethinking.

For a start it seems to me that while the terms such as campaigns, operations, battles and engagements remain undefined, it is absolutely pointless compiling such lists. If you have a look a thearticle I'm working through, you will see that I can add hundreds of "engagements" even at operational and strategic level, and these are only named for ground ops. Each one comes with an air op, and many with naval ops...and then I can go down to the thousands of lower-level "engagements". In fact there were thousands of cities fought over on the Eastern Front also, and since people think nothing of adding battalion actions, and even companies...

I had sometime last year proposed a more structured approach which was discussed and abandoned. I had also added a sort of an essay in the MilHist project pages. I have not had anyone comment yet, so please feel free...

I would suggest that there need to be Lists organised as follows (regardless of what the article title calls them)

• Grand strategy

List of covert operations during the Second World War (continuous operation (including planning) that lasted more then a year)

List of land campaigns during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two seasons)

List of naval campaigns during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two seasons)

List of air campaigns during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two seasons)

• Strategy

List of covert missions during the Second World War (continuous operative deployment for at least six months)

List of land strategic operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two months)

List of naval strategic operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two months)

List of air strategic operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two months)

• Operational level

List of covert tasks during the Second World War (continuous operative deployment for as least six weeks)

List of land operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two weeks)

List of naval operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two weeks)

List of air operations during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two weeks)

• Tactical level

List of covert actions during the Second World War (continuous operative deployment for as least six days)

List of land battles during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two days)

List of naval battles during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two days)

List of air battles during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then two days)

• Minor tactics

List of covert direct actions during the Second World War (continuous operative deployment for as least six hours)

List of land engagements during the Second World War(any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then nine hours)

List of naval engagements during the Second World War(any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then nine hours)

List of air engagements during the Second World War (any continuous combat action (from start of planning) that spans more then nine hours)

Note 1: I think that the use of "of" is bad English even if it has been used for centuries. Aside from the confusion with "off", "of" does not convey any meaning such as "in", or "near", of "for", etc. Most combat takes place over a period of time, and that period in this case is limited to the Second World War, i.e. during it, and not "of" it.Note 2: As an Australian I prefer to use the more logical Second World War as opposed to use of II which is easily mistyped as I, or Two, which is easily phonetically misunderstood as "too", never mind that the first World War was not One given there were at least two, but is followed by second ;o)

I would not have a list of combined ops at all. They may have been combined in planning, but the phases were necessarily restricted to operations in the environment of the troops' Service. Once those glider landed and the LCI beached, the operation was over for the pilots and the seamen, though of course many had to fight in ground roles. Cheers--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣14:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I wasn't blaming you at all. Glad someone is working on it. I'm in Sydney. Cheers--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣08:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am now trying to sort out the categories to see hat goes where because it proved to be extremely confusing to me when I tried to set up articles in my field of interest.

For a start I work from a sourced definition of what a military engagement is. It comes from a distinguished American military historianTrevor N. Dupuy, and is limited to combat between two forces between adivision and acompany in size.(form his book Understanding War:History and theory of combat). If you would like to go through the list and weed out which articles match this description, we can categorise them as such. How does that sound? There is a problem however. This definition is allied to ground troops, so we need to figure out what the naval and air equivalents would be, because although the naval and air forces also have divisions, they perform much greater role in combat then their ground equivalents.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣05:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Example of a naval air arm engagementEaster Sunday Raid. So, is this an air engagement or a naval one, or is there a need for a naval air arm engagements category?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣12:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a need for a naval air arm engagements category because there are numerous naval air arm engagements.EZ1234 (talk)07:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a good source for the USAAF 1941-1945[1]--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣10:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last time it was brought up the discussion did not come to a conclusion so I have started the conversation again. Not a big fan of flags myself but I am more concerned that all the articles have the same look and feel. We will have to wait and see what happens.MilborneOne (talk)20:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to join in on thisdiscussion concerning your recent new additions to the infobox.Askari Mark(Talk)18:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but your question isn't actually clear. Could you please rephrase it?Askari Mark(Talk)18:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, but I didn't notice that I hadtwo new messages on the 26th. For the purposes of the infobox, the final user's retirement of the aircraft should be used, and I would note the year, with the final user in parentheses, instead of vice versa. For a handy reference, check theInfobox Aircraft template description page.Askari Mark(Talk)17:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing "National origin" information from theInfobox Aircraft on aircraft pages, as you did on theMikoyan MiG-29 and theMikoyan MiG-29M pages. This field was discussed and accepted in discussion atWT:AIR, and is listed at [[WP:AIR/PC}WP:AIR's page content guidelines. If you have valid reasons why the field should not be used, either on some or all aircraft pages, please discuss this atWT:AIR. Thanks for your cooperation. -BillCJ (talk)07:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheMay 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)00:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - what did you have in mind? --Rlandmann (talk)10:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still experimenting;Please don't add those flag icons back - they really contribute nothing and just add visual clutter. I'm also not sure about separating historic and current types; I think the combined lists like theIsraeli list are more useful - no switching between lists or having to guess whether a particular type is still in service. --Rlandmann (talk)07:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheJune 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)18:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me an air engagement can be either air-to-air or air-to-surface in nature, so for example attacks on enemy shore installations is also an engagement because the anti-aircraft fire would be encountered from aid-fence units--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣10:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EZ1234. Very strange! I'm not sure what you're looking at the article in, but there very definitely is colour. The cells describing out-of-service aircraft were a pale grey, and those describing in-service aircraft were a pale lilac.

Tell me if you can see colour now; and if so, what colour? --Rlandmann (talk)03:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You're doing great work on the history of the Iraqi Air Force section. However, don't forget to put in references for all of the new material. Cheers.

Lawrencema (talk)05:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wanted to say thanks for signing my guest book. Normally I give people a cookie or a smilie to thank them for it but my computer is kind of messed up right now and sometimes it doesn't let me do that ♥♥Amulet♥Heart♥17:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Hidden Page Barnstar
		I awardyou one for findingTrekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail?TREKphilerhit me ♠08:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		TheWikiChevrons
		Good work on theZSU-23-4 article. In recognition of your efforts towards maintaining military history and weaponry articles, please accept theseWeaponry Task Force WikiChevrons! --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥18:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheJuly 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)01:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you have are great at creating infoboxes in SAM articles. Can you help fill in the infobx in9K35 Strela-10?--EZ1234 (talk)12:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥02:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macaroni soup. Thanks, --brewcrewer(yada, yada)03:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		TheIraqi Barnstar of National Merit
		For your awesome, impressive work on theIraqi Air Force article! Keep it up mate! uα(Operibus anteire)09:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right here, mate

Cheers!

uα^{(Operibus anteire)}06:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ay mate! But it appears there is somethingfishy with the user reviewing it; not only he/she started reviewing it relatively fast in comparison to the time the request was made in, but also there is no evident lack of experience as a consequent of the user being so "new" to WP.

Cheers!

uα^{(Operibus anteire)}14:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I place your tool box on my user page? I may be useful for me cheers--EZ1234 (talk)07:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For sure, go ahead! I took it initially fromCarom but he doesn't have it anymore... --ŦħęGɛя㎥20:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers--EZ1234 (talk)08:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have completed the GA review ofIraqi Air Force, with the full review being located atTalk:Iraqi Air Force/GA1. I have some serious concerns about the referencing in the article, and have put the article on hold until these concerns have been addressed. If you have any questions, you can ask on the review page or on my talk page.Dana boomer (talk)18:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheAugust 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might find this page useful in case your talk page gets any longer...WP:How to archive a talk page. Cheers!the_ed17^-contribs-04:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just keep the conversation on my page; justwatch my talk page and keep and keep an eye on it in yourWatchlist.the_ed17^-contribs-04:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I replied there too. =)the_ed17^-contribs-04:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be too intimidated; those are there just to show you what you need to source. If you could find a book on the history of the Iraqi Air Force at your library, most of those fact tags could probably be fixed by that! Cheers,the_ed17^-contribs-16:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #11 is the only dead ref.the_ed17^-contribs-02:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that! I will attempt to find some books on the Iraqi Air Force soon.--EZ1234 (talk)08:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Pleasevote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheSeptember 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheOctober 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheNovember 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)16:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheDecember 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)02:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheJanuary 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)03:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheFebruary 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)18:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Pleasevote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)00:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheMarch 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)02:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheApril 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheMay 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheJune 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheJuly 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of theAviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in theAviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign uphere, read up on the ruleshere, and discuss the contesthere. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedbackhere, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -TrevorMacInnis^contribs00:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies^talk04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheAugust 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting in theMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please votehere by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies^talk22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheSeptember 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of theMilitary history WikiProject orWorld War I task force, you may be interested in competing in theHenry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing forOperationGreat War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign uphere, read up on the ruleshere, and discuss the contesthere!
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)18:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheOctober 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)18:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheNovember 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)08:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheDecember 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)03:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheJanuary 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)03:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on thecoordinator academy course and in theresponsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheFebruary 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for theMilitary history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMarch 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheApril 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMay 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast yourvote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies^talk21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheMilitary history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Your Military history Newsletter Project News:Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions •The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients •bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom. Past editions may be viewedhere.BrownBot (talk)20:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)15:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)21:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)01:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial:Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed:Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)22:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed:WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)21:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed:Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed:Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Hi EZ1234! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:

1. What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
2. Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
3. What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
4. Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following atUser talk:Sp33dyphil#MILHIST Military Aviation questionnaire and filling it out.

; ~~~#My strengths#Articles I'd like to see the task force improve#:#:#:#:#Sources which I have#:#:#Articles I'm willing to provide assistance#:

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil© •©09:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay:Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay:Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed:DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do sohere. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of thecoordinators,Nick-D (talk) andEd ^{[talk][majestic titan]}23:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)You were sent this message because you are a listed as amember of theMilitary history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay:Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed:Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed:The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview:Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed:Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed:Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview:Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed:Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed:Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of thecurrent coordinators on their talk page.This message was delivered here because you are amember of the Military history WikiProject. –Military history coordinators (about the project •what coordinators do) 08:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed:Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed:The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed:Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview:Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed:Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed:Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview:Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed:Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed:ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed:Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed:Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview:What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed:Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Kirill ^[talk]17:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed:Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed:AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview:Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed:TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedStoryville (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesAnonymous andThe House I Live In (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks atBritain's War Machine Interview:Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks atThe Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed:Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed:TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview:World War I editors Op-ed:TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed:TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for theMilitary historian of the year andMilitary history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview:2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed:TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed:TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed:TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed:TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview:Featured picture participants Op-ed:TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles:Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews:Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed:We can (not) advance Timeline:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours,Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay:Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed:TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed:TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed:TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed:TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed:TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline:Events of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed:TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed:Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed:TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview:A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay:Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed:TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Hello, EZ1234. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay:Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed:TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed:TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed:TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed:Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed:TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I