WishingESkog a veryhappy adminship anniversary on behalf of theBirthday Committee! Best wishes!DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)03:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thissurvey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view itsprivacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards,Sam Walton (talk)16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Eastfarthingan actually erased all my efforts to maintain information deviations. I tried to call but no one cared, while you were actively deleting a sentence that was considered my mistake. What should I think about your indifference to the false information about Vietnamese history? Are you also among racist cheers? Can you read Vietnamese to see his confusion?— Precedingunsigned comment added by2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk)15:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You cannot read Vietnamese, but you try to maintain false information from the viewpoint of a boy boycott many times because of the abuse of power. If you respect the history, you did not do that.2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk)15:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  ReadWikipedia:NPOV please. Your edit did not follow theWikipedia:MOS, and these edits were personal and unprofessional, which is not the setting Wikipedia wishes to achieve. If you have an edit you would like to make, be sure to read the MOS and use the talk page for anything further.Lavi edits stuff (talk)15:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I am just a normal contributor, so I really don't want to be aggressive in this hateful way. But you have provoked that through the unconsciousness and indifference irresponsible with historical information.2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk)15:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  All of your edits have beenWikipedia:NOTHERE. Please stop.Lavi edits stuff (talk)15:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  If the false article is still maintained and the creator is still protected, then there will be more people attacking Wikipedia in the coming time. Because this article was shared by my group on official information channels of the State. This is a very important historical event for Vietnam, so all of you will definitely be disturbed.2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk)15:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Instead of repairing dirty information, you block all the supply from people with more experienced. Therefore, you deserve punishment.2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk)15:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Note that the above user has been blocked; if this conversation continues it'll be on their Talk page. (ESkog)^(Talk)15:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  They seemed unresponsive on their own talk page. Sorry for the pings you likely had to deal with.Lavi edits stuff (talk)15:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle often places warning in the wrong section as was added toDollyrohampton'stalk page here. I moved yours and mine to the bottom of Dollyrohampton's talk page. I wish this would get fixed. CheersAdakiko (talk)19:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am adding dedications to theClara Coltman Rogers Vyvyan bibliography to illustrate her network of friends and contacts. Could you please restore the work I have done so far? Thank you.81.135.203.26 (talk)22:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A vandal who vandlised question mark must've saw my account, because his username is similar to mine. Luckly you reverted it. Thank you.KoopaGamer (talk)22:56, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your response time and rabid dedication regarding all suspicious edits are a credit in your favor. 93/1002600:4041:5670:8F00:F14F:1AC3:3E41:875B (talk)21:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.88.85.109.5(talk ·contribs ·WHOIS) seems an bit upset. I wouldn't usually bother asking but they seem to intent.Knitsey (talk)15:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are pure passion, pure meaning.2802:8012:83:5200:8000:59C3:F4AB:E021 (talk)11:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour c'est moi qui est modifié la page de stormworks sous une adresse IP avant de crée mon compte. Mes intentions n'étais pas de vandalisme la page mais de contribuer a elle .Je souhaitait ajouter une catégorie "mise a jour".MerciSkyy6127 (talk)15:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

aboutthis warning, same thing as i said to another editorhere. for what its worth i dont think theyre a vandal if you check their contribs and edit descriptions here⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾, but rather a lost newbie with a coi, might be a distinction without a difference.fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk)14:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you recently blockedUser:Rylès HADJAR, but they seem to have created a new accountUser:DZ Rylès with the same user page content and similar edits.Rosbif73 (talk)15:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day,ESkog, from theWikipedia Birthday Committee!Have a great day!RPE✍️📚03:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From theBirthday Committee,DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)04:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ESkog. I've noticed that you often block individual IPv6 addresses rather than a /64 range. Since many devices rotate the last part of the address, /64 blocks tend to be more effective, especially for blocks longer than a few hours. For example, if you look at your block of2a01:e0a:120:88c0:b89f:ae5d:4a74:faac, there's a fair amount of disruption from other addresses on2a01:e0a:120:88c0::/64 and that IP range has also been blocked recently. Blocking a /64 only affects a tiny portion of the IPv6 space (proportionally it's far less than a single IPv4 address compared to the whole of IPv4). If you use Twinkle, there's a checkbox option to use the /64 by default for IPv6 blocks. There's also an essay about this atWP:/64. Regards.Daniel Quinlan (talk)22:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks! I didn't know that and that is definitely helpful info. (ESkog)^(Talk)22:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You're welcome.Daniel Quinlan (talk)07:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no fun allowed loser— Precedingunsigned comment added by31.187.0.12 (talk •contribs)20:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that your reversion of the vandalism of the introductory paragraphs to the Marxism article do not appear to display publicly. I am old and very inexperienced as an editor, so I thought it best to simply draw this to your attention.AussieBoy (talk)01:46, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you😡2600:1700:B30:9640:1CEB:2E3D:EF9:E52D (talk)22:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🤬2600:1700:B30:9640:1CEB:2E3D:EF9:E52D (talk)22:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. (ESkog)^(Talk)22:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you semi-protect my Draft from this user?Starmaglclove (talk)20:45, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrote a response to your message, on my talk page. I will likely leave this "community" soonPuppycornToonz (talk)19:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I made another one, and I mean this message this time.— Precedingunsigned comment added byPuppycornToonz (talk •contribs)22:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Couldthis please be revdeleted for BLP issues?Entranced98 (talk)17:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (ESkog)^(Talk)17:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Entranced98 (talk)17:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ESkog, I think it might be worth revoking TPAhere. Thanks,Referentis (talk)22:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For your swift action reverting vandalism onJamie Baillie, and looking into it far enough to block the involved editor. I'm from NS, so I have this article watchlisted pretty much for this reason... Fun anecdote: I ran into Jamie Baillie on Spring Garden Road in Halifax in the summer of 2016, and in a moment I still think about sometimes late at night, I asked him ... "Excuse me,Geoff Regan?" ... Still think they look alike. Cheers,MediaKyle (talk)01:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tysm for editing my draft. Im so happy that someone who knows how to edit edited it. I was sure it was going to get deleted, But Because of you it didn't!Starmaglclove (talk)20:29, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is Dandy's World btw!Starmaglclove (talk)20:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I'm nebulaz. I would like to inform you I have edited a part of the Flowey article. You described to PuppycornToonz, that Wikipedia is not a gameplay guide. And you edited out his instructions due to this factor. Although continued to include part of the guide. That part of the guide has now been removed,as editors should not go against their or Wikipedia's own policy, as it inflicts feelings of bias to specific people in our community.If there is any information that serves as a gameplay guide, and is in no way related to FLowey, I politely ask you to remove it yourself, or I will do it for you. Thanks for the understanding!— Precedingunsigned comment added byNebulaz (talk •contribs)23:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I was mostly reverting vandalism, not commenting on the underlying Wikipedia norms about avoiding game-guide style content. Feel free to keep working on it to help it better align with those rules. (ESkog)^(Talk)01:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the understanding. If I put feelings of guilt or other emotions unto you due to my accusations of bias, I formally apologize.Nebulaz (talk)17:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For your SAQ-edits.Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)07:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sorry not being familiar w/protocol perhaps you can help me. I attempted to add content to this page with knowledge I personally experienced. Thank youCmacchi (talk)14:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]