Archives

/Archive 1./Archive 2./Archive 3./Archive 4./Archive 5./Archive 6./Archive 7./Archive 8./Archive 9./Archive 10./Archive 11./Archive 12

No personal relationship exists between any editor on the article. your application of random templates is unwarranted and presented with no evidence. The opinion about a properly referenced primary sourced block-quote is discussed on the talk page and has no consensus for removal. It is also not policy. Please stop this activity. I will look for the NPOV that you have called out.

I hope to work with you on the project under different circumstances soon. All my bestUser:Lightburst15:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This reply proves Lightburst is a liar. Lightburst claimed that he had taken a personal photograph of said individual at their wedding while above he claimed no have no personal relationship. Lying about taking that photo showed it was yet another copyright violation by Lightburst, complete with a false claim of ownership of someone else's work. To hide his latest violation Lightburst proceeded to rename his account, make false accusations of outing and slander others whilst giving them no avenue of redress. He also did the equivalent of taking his bat and ball and going home. The above article no longer exists because after rudely and aggressively claiming clear notability of said subject he proceeded to call himself a liar and nominated the article for deletion on the grounds of non notability.duffbeerforme (talk)13:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duffbeerforme,

Just a reminder, when you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.), it is advised that you post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. This is typically done by making use ofTwinkle, an editing tool used by almost all page patrollers and most administrators. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", when you tag a page for deletion using Twinkle, the program will post a notification on your behalf. Twinkle has a lot of other handy features, you can tag articles for problems they contain, report vandals to noticeboards, welcome editors, post talk page warnings for all sorts of issues, Twinkle will even maintain deletion logs for you if you'd like to keep track of those things. I encourage you to try it out. Thank you.Liz^Read!Talk!00:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a weird obsession with Eric West. If his role was minor, he was all over TV promoting it. They send out actors to promote minor roles?

https://www.instagram.com/p/CXT_M0LuA8l/

Get a life.192.121.112.68 (talk)18:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK Eric, keep trying to convince yourself.duffbeerforme (talk)04:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you're going to revert any edits, as you did onDylan Clarke, please have a civil or sensible reason for doing it, saying it's "bs" or "bull s#!t" or using any other expletive language is not reasonable.

The fact of the matter was that it was such a very embarrassing loss forCarlton which resulted inBrendon Bolton losing his job, andPatrick Cripps would be held liable for his abysmal performance.

On that end, I would also like to know which AFL club you support, if any. If it was Carlton, I would not be surprised.Avatar5991 (talk)00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you're going to revert any edits, as you did onDylan Clarke, please have a civil or sensible reason for doing it, reverting just because an edit summary says "bs" or "bull s#!t" is not reasonable.

I had a very sensible and reasonable reason. The claim was bull shit. It was not supported by the source. The source simply did not mention Clarke. That one loss alone did not result in Bolton's sacking. Clarke's performance was not the sole reason for Carlton's poor performance (amongst other things 7 Bombers had more possessions than the best performing Blue, Clarke was not one of them). You can't just make shit up and put it in. If sources claim that the go for it but don't put original research into Wikipedia.

More importantly why did you revert me? Why did you choose to reinsert false information back into the article? Why did you reintroduce a challenged and unsourced claim into a BLP? Was it simply because I (didn't) swear? Seems like a stupid move if that's the case.duffbeerforme (talk)00:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Duff. There was, as you no doubt know, a solid consensus atWikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 April 1 for overturning the speedy deletion ofList of Parkruns in the United Kingdom and related articles, so I have closed the review accordingly. You may like to take the articles to AfD, or someone else may, since several other editors expressed support for doing so. I have no personal view as to whether the articles should be deleted or not.JBW (talk)18:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duffbeerforme, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time butit requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly readthe tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see thegranting conditions. You can apply for the user-rightHERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer'sdiscussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent byNPP Coordination usingMediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was offline for a few days. Regarding your query atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kee (lawyer), yes, Rick570 was exactly the editor I was thinking of.Schwede6604:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming that.duffbeerforme (talk)12:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna take a look atthe Stagestruck afd? I added some reception. Cheers,Ouro(blah blah)13:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duffbeerforme, our group,WikiProject Australian television, is currently recruiting additional editors to help edit the large project that is Australian TV. I was wondering whether you might consider joining us, since you work on Australian TV-related articles anyway. If you are interested, please add your name to the list of active participants, and see our list of open tasks. All the best,Lotsw73 (talk)12:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duffbeerforme,

Please useTwinkle to tag pages for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.). This will not only leave a descriptive edit summary but once you set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post a notification on the talk page of the editor who created the page which is an important step in the deletion process. It's important to inform content creators when articles (or redirects, templates or categories) that they created are headed for deletion and the reason why. Most page patrollers and many admins use Twinkle daily because it makes editing so much easier, basically it has all of the templates you might need so you don't need to search for the appropriate one. It will allow you to easily tag articles for problems, report vandals to noticeboard, keep logs of your deletion tagging, welcome new editors, do so many tasks. I encourage you to try it out. Thank you.Liz^Read!Talk!04:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRahel Romahn has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor with mostly small roles in various tv shows, was nominated for 2 awards in 2016 (unclear to me if this alone makes him notable or not, the AACTA nomination appears to be the reason the article was created in the first place).

Going off theNotability (people) guidelines he appears to not be notable.

First time doing this, apologies if I did something wrong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Abandonee (talk)19:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your DRV request was malformed. You replaced the example format with your DRV request and left it inside the comment delimiters. I've moved it for you, and added your name and time stamp to the request. --Whpq (talk)14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello@Duffbeerforme:, could you please create an article for Australian actorMitchell Hope, who is best known for appearing as main character Ben on theDescendants film franchise and in the filmLet It Snow alongsideKiernan Shipka?CheAjlt (talk)16:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm not an expert on Azalia Snail, but I'm generally interested in the part of the music world in which she's notable, and while visiting her page I noticed the flag you'd posted suggesting there may have been undisclosed editing for pay. This was five years ago, and I don't see anything on the talk page elaborating on the alleged problem or discussing it in any way. I'm wondering what the upshot of this is—whether something explaining the flagging could be added to the talk page (if you still recall the details after all this time); or, alternatively, the flag can be removed if this was a false alarm. Thanks!Jcejhay (talk)17:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia without their explicit permission. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remaincompletely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia'sharassment policy. Wikipedia's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have beenreverted and/orsuppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, includingyou. Persistently adding personal information about other contributorswill result in beingblocked from editing.I redacted your use of what you believe to be an editor's real first name. Don't do that again.Levivich (talk)16:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No Levivich. I did not post anything that he himself had already posted. He gave his full name, a self portrait, etc. His name is still publicly visible.duffbeerforme (talk)23:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just letting you know you forgot to sign your comment atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginny Holder (2nd nomination). Best, -My, oh my!(Mushy Yank)14:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done now.duffbeerforme (talk)05:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your comment on the Mark Diamond AfD. I suggest that you strike your allegation of UPE unless you have evidence. There may be a conflict of interest (discouraged but permitted) without reason to conclude such a person was paid. And there are just super-fans who want someone they don't know to have their own article.

Arbcom has saidAn editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe. If accusations must be made, they should be raised, with evidence, on the user-talk page of the editor they concern or in theappropriate forums. Of course, this isn't repeated or particularly severe by AfD terms but I suggest you take that message to heart.Oblivy (talk)04:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the sources you cited to her article, but I cannot access some of them. Could you add more detail about those? (They are the ones under the heading "Further reading"). Thanks! --Ssilvers (talk)08:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBarbara Stephens (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWarming Up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that if you come across a bad or incomplete article and choose to draftify it, youalso need to either disable or remove any categories that were on the page at the same time — drafts can't be in categories perWP:DRAFTNOCAT, so if you don't disable or remove the categories, then you're just making more work for other people. Thanks.Bearcat (talk)14:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you want to sign your edit you just made.[1].LibStar (talk)03:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks.duffbeerforme (talk)03:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'mjust talking to the ceiling, but wouldn't this deletion without debate be controversial?Bearian (talk)05:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think cleaning up UPE spam should not be controversial but since you think it is I've moved it to afd.duffbeerforme (talk)11:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I commend you on creating new film articles for Australian documentary films. Could you please useTemplate:Film date as stated inTemplate:Infobox film? When you do not it places them in a maintenance category,Category:Pages using infobox film with nonstandard dates, needing correction.Aspects (talk)00:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I've started adding this template to older pages.duffbeerforme (talk)23:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged this article on February 13 withA major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject and an edit summary of "paid for spam". The paid editor complied withWP:PAID. The draft article went through theArticles for Creation process and was accepted. The whole purpose of the paid contributions disclosure and the requirement for such editors to go through AfC is to provide a legitimate path to create an article. The article was discussed at theTeahouse last October, where I became aware of it. If you are concerned enough to tag the article, you should be concerned enough to explain your reasoning on the article talk page.Cullen328 (talk)09:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Prod is only for non-controversial deletions. Please go toWP:AfD.Bearian (talk)05:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding. There are some sources; I added some that I found to external links. The deletion of a woman musician during March might look bad. Please discuss atWP:AfD, where her 1st LP's article is already.Bearian (talk)07:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For Real? Don't delete this obvious case because it's March. Fuck no.duffbeerforme (talk)12:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You stated that he only has "Lots of small parts but no significant roles in notable productions" which is correct, Luke has a lot of small parts but he has been part of big productions like Academy Award winning Jojo Rabbit (2019), as other awards in the 2019/2020 Award Season from Twentieth Century Fox under the ownership of Disney and the controversial The Flash (2023) film from DC Studios, as well being part of Anne Rice's Interview With The Vampire (2022) from AMC. The page was discussed back in February there was no evidence provided to state that he only has indie productions when he has been working in big studio movies but with small roles. Would appreciate a bit more of clarification in the future discussions before deletion.Moonhowlter (talk)07:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the article's talk page. Note that paid editing MUST be declared.duffbeerforme (talk)23:30, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's hilarious that you would assume someone likes an actor and it's "paid editing." We can start a new article's talk page.Moonhowlter (talk)00:34, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than getting into a reversion war, can you tell me what source you are using for your remarkable assertions.Doug butler (talk)01:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article talk page is the best place for this discussion. To answer your question, the source used in the article, currently source number 2, Jacqueline Lee Lewes article inThe Age.duffbeerforme (talk)01:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hooks' article from June 30 also names Alice and not Marree. As does Pamela Bone inThe Age June 26.duffbeerforme (talk)01:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And what was your source for Dave being the bad guy?duffbeerforme (talk)01:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start again at the talk page.Doug butler (talk)02:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The documentation of{{COI}} includes (emphasis per original):

Like the other neutrality-related tags,if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start a discussion, any editor will be justified in removing the tag without warning.

I trust that is sufficiently clear for you to understand.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits09:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YesAndy that is sufficiently clear. Matches up with what I said. It says should, not shall or must. Should is a recommendation, a strong one maybe but NOT a requirement. "Because of the built-in flexibility of the word, if the document writer intends to mandate a requirement, should is not an appropriate choice." However, per that second sentence I should not have restored it the first time. Mea culpa.duffbeerforme (talk)08:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a requirement. You have started a discussion, but it does not "explain what is non-neutral about the article".Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits08:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the text from the template instructions that you posted. Should.duffbeerforme (talk)08:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSteven Grives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Grives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NonfrostClive (talk)13:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleCamilla Rountree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla Rountree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NonfrostClive (talk)13:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTanzyn Crawford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanzyn Crawford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NonfrostClive (talk)13:29, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard of her, and she's possibly notable. Certainly, Blues fans are rabid, so deletion without debate could be controversial.Bearian (talk)01:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I've started the debate.duffbeerforme (talk)03:39, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Duffbeerforme: I just wanted to ask you if can you please create an article for actressBonnie Hellman? She has appeared in more than 119 film and tv projects to this date!!CheAjlt (talk)23:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few sources maybe of use:1988 profile (2),1981 review,1985 brief bio,1984 blurb,2010 horoscope.CheAjlt (talk)23:02, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want a page created for her?duffbeerforme (talk)00:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like that pleaseCheAjlt (talk)19:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why?duffbeerforme (talk)11:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because she is revelant according to her extended film and tv career.CheAjlt (talk)21:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you tagged the pageDylan Verrechia for speedy deletion with the reason "G11 advertising". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article was created in 2010, there are non-problematic versions in the history that you can revert to rather than deleting. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with aspeedy deletion template which does apply,redirecting it to another page,proposing the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or taking the page toWikipedia:Articles for deletion for a wider discussion. Thanks!Stifle (talk)08:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do see what you mean now about the promotional editing. I've given the user a warning and some advice. It's possible but admittedly very unlikely that they are unrelated to Verrechia in some form or fashion. My personal thought is that they are a separate person who was paid or otherwise asked to come edit Wikipedia for the director. It's also suspicious that they started editing around the same time that another editor with the same MO stopped. A look shows a similar chain of single purpose editors coming to Wikipedia. Offhand I see JonasRiis, Cafasaqui, the director himself (obv), and a string of IP addresses. Ottomortimer is also likely part of the group, as they made one edit and that was to the director's article.

I'm actually starting to lean towards TNTing the lot and leaving it up for someone unrelated to create, because the edit history is so rife with single purpose editors. The director's article needs an almost complete re-write and beyond that, it will need to be monitored because of a clear history of either sockpuppetry or undisclosed paid editing.ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡)16:36, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I highly recommend opening a SPI. I am not on as frequently as I once was, so I wouldn't be a good person to open it but I will absolutely voice my support. The guy seems to have also hired the same people to do this on the Spanish Wikipedia. The article has been deleted several times as spam. It looks like whomever he hires to edit here also tries to recreate it there.

Evidence:deletion notices for Jonas Riis,Jonas Riis adding mention to a festival page on Spanish Wikipedia (SW).Edit history of one of the IPs on SW - not about Verrechia, but does show they were editing on both Wikipedias

Another SPA is Octored. Theydon't appear to have edited on SW, but they did register an account there, so likely they had edits that were deleted previously since the new article is very recent. Ottomortimer is also a SPA, but no SW account.

So that's five accounts, not including the one that is currently active. If I wasn't involved with the AfD I'd block the current one, but I'm involved and would like this to be on the up and up.ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡)17:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I opened it anyway. Please weigh inhere. I alerted the various accounts. Probably unnecessary since all but one are inactive, but I wanted to mention it just in case one of them pops back in to refute the claims. (And will make it easier to check if they're editing from the same place.)ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡)17:58, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I've added a small comment and will look more.duffbeerforme (talk)00:07, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! We did a good job with evidence - I've not seen a SPI close that fast in a while!ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡)19:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did a good job. I must admit I thought at first it would not end that way. Just changing accounts. But there was a small overlap and it was an edit designed entirely to deceive. Good Block. well doneduffbeerforme (talk)12:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my article about this company? It’s quite a large company in China in a way. Which parts of content are spam?Iuliusnanus (talk)07:58, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete your spam.duffbeerforme (talk)07:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that I've declined yourG4 speedy deletion nomination ofDaryush Shokof because the new version is not sufficiently similar to the one deleted via discussion in 2023. Specifically, the new article includes several sources that were not present in the original. However, you could not have known this, so it was still a good nomination. If you think Shokof still fails to meet Wikipedia'snotability guidelines for people, feel free to nominate for deletion viaAfD. Thanks!Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)16:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note.duffbeerforme (talk)00:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Duffbeerforme: a few months ago I asked you if can you could create an article for actressBonnie Hellman, could you please create a page of her?CheAjlt (talk)11:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]