Archives | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
No longer my sort of place. Turning into a version of RationalWiki rather than an encyclopaedia. Like the crowds of louts at universities stopping people talking about anything they disagree with. Why can people no longer trust the power of having a neutral point of view but must try forcing their own even though that just gets others to go into their own bubbles?Dmcq (talk)15:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you, but in an elliptical way. The Wikipedia gurus now wish to block any kind of challenge to their authority. The worst bubble is theBillDixon56 (talk)06:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
....sorry thet reply got interrupted...The worst bubble is them, and so the whole idea of a community-based body of knowledge turns to dust.BillDixon56 (talk)06:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season.Lightburst (talk)23:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —MarkH21talk04:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sent winging your way. Thank you for past thoughtfulness.– SJ +15:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleROX Desktop, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROX Desktop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]