Archives

1,2,3

This user is one of the400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

A tag has been placed onCategory:1902 animated films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1902 in animation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1453 in Oceania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1450s in Oceania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Years of the 15th century in Oceania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Films directed by Jon Burton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Observances in Transnistria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Morgan le Fay has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)22:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Events in Transnistria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!18:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1855 disestablishments in the Russian Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1892 disestablishments in the Russian Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1964 disestablishments in the Soviet Union indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!06:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dimadick,Inominated Levantine Article for FAC. As you contributed toWest Semitic languages in the past and given your interest in Arab countries, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide.A455bcd9 (talk)08:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Iranian Azerbaijani men indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!18:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.65.94.99.221 (talk)06:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I mean really, "the feudal ruling families which were black people)"? I've brought up other edits of his atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about an editor going through articles changing Jewish to Israelite.Doug Wellertalk07:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Anancidae indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Talk page info atDraft:Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation. However did you even find it? You seem way more experienced and knowledgeable than I, and if you don't mind helping out a bit more, I have some other questions. Diffusion of innovation is a section title, and when I went to work on the draft it came up with the full title and (section) next to it. Then the next time, it didn't. I don't understand, and I am wondering if I need to change the title, and how to do that. Also, this is a total rewrite of another articleChristianization of the Roman Empire. It got lots of objections, and I am wondering about changing its title to represent that it is a historiographical view. This draft is a rewrite of CRE from this other perspective, should CRE just be deleted instead? I would love it if you wanted to participate here! Input from an editor of your quality would be valued and appreciated! Thanx again.Jenhawk777 (talk)17:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you remember, I already made changes to the original article a few months ago. I am just interested in the topic. You can rename the draft through simply pressing the move button and adding a new title.Dimadick (talk)18:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did I offend you in some way? If I did I am genuinely sorry. I do tend to have strong opinions on this subject. I try to always keep it civil, and if I failed to do that, please forgive me. Others have strong feelings as well and have certainly frustrated me by repeatedly voicing opinion rather than sources, but I'm guessing that probably wasn't you. It's possible my frustration spread to those who didn't deserve it, so if it did, I am heartily sorry. I probably deserve it, but please don't hold whatever I did or said against me anyway.Jenhawk777 (talk)02:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No I was not expressing anger, and you are unusually courteous for a Wikipedian. I was just explaining that the draft can be easily renamed. I will see what I can do about copyediting.Dimadick (talk)04:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I think! Not too unusual I hope. Let it reflect that you are worth the effort rather than that I have some unusual virtue - I assume you think it's a virtue! Nevermind! I am losing ground here... Thank you for the help given so far and any future assistance you may feel led to provide. I do know that collaboration always produces a better result.Jenhawk777 (talk)05:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent all the thank you's the system will allow, and it isn't a drop in the bucket! Bless you! Thank you in multiples! 17:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Dimadick. Thanks for creatingCategory:Late Neolithic. I think we might need to separate the "Late Neolithic" in SW Asia from the "Late Neolithic" of Europe though, since these are unrelated entities separated by a few thousand years. And more broadly the subdivisions of the Neolithic are region-specific (e.g. thePre-Pottery Neolithic exists only in SW Asia; theEneolithic exists only in Central and Eastern Europe) so if we're going to subcategoriseCategory:Neolithic by period there should be some indication of the geographical scope of each category. I probably created the possibility for confusion when I movedPottery Neolithic (about the SW Asian period) toLate Neolithic based on it being the more common name, not considering that it is also much more generic. Any ideas on how to proceed? – Joe (talk)09:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the time being, I am simply locating the articles that have texts concerning the Late Neolithic/Pottery Neolithic. The geographic scope can be covered in subcategories, provided that there is some kind of supporting text for them.Dimadick (talk)09:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But this is creating a category that mixes totally unrelated articles likeDagenham idol (an artefact from England from c. 2250 BCE),Çayönü (a site in Turkey abandoned by c. 6800 BCE), andYueshi culture (a culture in China dated to the 2nd millennium BCE). Even if we had subcategories for the regional periods, they shouldn't be categorised underCategory:Late Neolithic, because they don't share a defining characteristic, just an overlap in terminology. – Joe (talk)09:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As with theNeolithic itself, it covers a phase in the technological/cultural development of various regions. Not a direct lineage between cultures, nor a terminology limited to a single region. Most of these articles had not even been categorized as Neolithic sites or artifacts, not even marked as archaeological locations.Dimadick (talk)10:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It really doesn't, but okay, you do you. Any categorisation is better than no categorisation, I suppose. – Joe (talk)10:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Holy Roman Emperors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)17:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:States and territories established in 1069 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Bugs Bunny has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Bosko has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring the Tasmanian Devil (Looney Tunes) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Porky Pig has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Yosemite Sam has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Tweety has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Buddy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Beans (Looney Tunes) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Foxy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Piggy has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Goopy Geer has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Red (animated character) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Mammy Two Shoes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Barney Bear has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Tex Avery's Big Bad Wolf has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Butch (animated character) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just reread your comment on the talk page ofChristianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation and I think I may have misunderstood. I thought your comment was to me and now I think it wasn't. My response comes across as offensive - and pretty stupid... So, I am a little crazy this year, and I just wanted to apologize that some of it ended up on you. I am sorry. I hope you can forgive me.Jenhawk777 (talk)19:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found your answer strange, but not offensive. Some people give me a hard time on Wikipedia, but an off-hand comment is not particularly troubling.Dimadick (talk)19:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was strange! I thought you were talking to me, but you weren't, were you? You were asking him for something constructive and actually relevant. I see that now. I didn't see that at first because I am so thin skinned these days that I am interpreting everything as an attack. I am walking around with my skin turned inside out and all my nerves exposed because my mother died and my sister stole from me, and I am hurt and angry, and it's made me a little crazy. Thank you for not getting offended. People give me a hard time on WP too - as you can see from the comment that we both responded to. These two articles - CRE and CRE as diffusion - have really been subject to a hard time. In the end, though, it has improved both articles, and that's something that makes me feel better in spite of everything else. So thank you again. I hope to see you around.Jenhawk777 (talk)03:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"and my sister stole from me" This reminds me of my father. During quarrels over their inheritance, his sister stole a large sum from him and his brother tried to strangulate him.Dimadick (talk)06:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OMG!! This is actually the second time she has done something like this to me, and I know of things even worse that she has done to others. She wiped out her first husband's bank accounts when she skipped town with her boyfriend. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I haven't spoken to her since, and I won't. She's out of my life for good this time. I knew that was who she used to be, but I actually thought she had changed - gotten a decent job and a good relationship and straightened up - I hoped. But there was no way for me to prevent this. Now I've lost both my sister and my mother. Thank you for understanding. It's proving to be a difficult year.Jenhawk777 (talk)17:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Easy to understand. My mother and the great-uncle who mostly raised me both died in 2016. It left me quite depressed, even when not taking into account paperwork over who was going to inherit their residences and an uncle who disputer the terms of the wills. Families can become nasty dens of vipers when money is at stake.Dimadick (talk)18:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And that's so backwards and short sighted isn't it? People have innate value, everything else has derived value. Take all the money out of the world, and people will still find a way to trade and value their work and cooperate. Take all the people out of the world and money is worthless; animals can't eat it, it can't reproduce on its own, all it can do by itself is sit and rot. Money only has power because we give it power, and it only has the power we decide it has. My sister sacrificed me for money. Those are her values, that's her character, that's what valuing money first has made her, when the real truth is that people are what matter most. People make history, make art, make beauty and goodness and love. People build and create. People do all of that and more because they can, because people have the power, and people have the value and the will and the ability to decide for themselves who they want to be. Difficulties and troubles don't turn us into something we're not, they just have a way of revealing that true character, that's all. It's who my sister is and always has been. It makes me sad, but it's hers to do with as she will. I just can't let it change me. Friends help with that. If it's okay with you, I am going to count you as a friend from now on. Kind and understanding hearts don't show up on WP all that often if you know what I mean! I'm glad to have met you.Jenhawk777 (talk)04:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"People have innate value, everything else has derived value." Almost everything on this planet has the value we assign to it. What seems essential to a certain culture or region may be seen as trivial or worthless to another one. But humans are social animals, and we need other humans to properly function or to survive. That the people we meet may not be trustworthy does not mean that our need for others ever ceases. Thanks by the way, for chatting with me. I haven't had much opportunity to do that for the last couple of months.Dimadick (talk)05:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are so right, and therein lies the rub, as they say. I have enjoyed chatting with you, and thank you as well. I've been getting yelled at a lot in the last two months, but no real chatting for me either, so yes, this has been good. I appreciate that you have taken the time to respond. I don't get to have many philosophical discussions especially. I do not understand why others find it boring... It seems we are like-minded in many ways. That's especially nice to find. I'm sure it proves you are brilliant.Jenhawk777 (talk)22:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring Andy Panda has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)08:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring pets has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)08:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring hypnosis has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)08:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films featuring feuds has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)08:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Dimadick how are you?TBTSP (talk)13:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other than a few dizzy spells in the morning ours, fine.Dimadick (talk)13:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK can I ask you something?TBTSP (talk)13:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is what talk pages are for. Go ahead.Dimadick (talk)13:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of horror films?TBTSP (talk)13:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are on my favorite film genres. I have enjoyed several films aboutvampires,werewolves, and slasher-style serial killers.Dimadick (talk)13:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you fix something on there?TBTSP (talk)13:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have to be careful about MrOllie he ain't right sometimes.TBTSP (talk)13:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now about horror films since 2020s is still a new decade it's not ready yet can you change it as a 2010s section for now?TBTSP (talk)13:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which article are you talking about?Dimadick (talk)13:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles actuallyHorror film andHistory of horror films.TBTSP (talk)13:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And if you edit the history of horror films article make sure you remove the link list of horror films of 2020s off the 2010s section.TBTSP (talk)13:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 2020s section in either of the two articles.Dimadick (talk)13:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope and I know it sucks.TBTSP (talk)13:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer, this is a block evading editor who would like you to help them get around an article protection that is in place because of them. Also note that they twice tried to blank my message from your talk page. -MrOllie (talk)13:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MrOllie, I already noticed your message. I just have no idea what this request is about.Dimadick (talk)13:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dimadick if you want to restore 2010s and 2020s for the horror film article you can nobody's forcing you.MeWuYi (talk)16:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afteryou replaced{{WikiProject Women}}, I had a double-check, and my apologies are due. I've thought thatWikiProject Women was only concerned with non-fictional women, i.e. biographies and the like. I was wrong, and I'm quite sorry for having wongly removed it in the first place. IAWthat project's scale, I've classified the article at "C" (and replaced the otherwise-harmless spacing in the WPBS, but which helps with visual distinction between the shell and its contained templates). —Fourthords |=Λ= |13:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1608 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you started the page Deaths in May 1993. You just beat me to it since I wanted start on it shortly. One request: please correct the cause of death part of your entries to match the format of the other list articles:

• use a comma not a point
• 'Death from' is redundant
• try to keep the CoD short

CheersMill 1 (talk)12:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cause of death can't contradict the sources in the main article. I prefer full sentences to overuse of commas.Dimadick (talk)14:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick You are entitled to your own preferences but this is a collaborative effort. You can always start a discussion to present your arguments before changing the format that is used in 330+ articles.Mill 1 (talk)14:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[2]JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk)15:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Computer-related introductions in the 1840s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!19:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is notice that I have requested input from a third opinion over the issue:Wikipedia:Third opinion#Active disagreementsFides2022 (talk)00:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hoaxes in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)13:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:19th-century people of the Holy Roman Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1972 disestablishments in Mississippi indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!23:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Audiovisual introductions in 1659 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!23:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1734 crimes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1659 introductions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1599 crimes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!23:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1947 disestablishments in Greece indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!23:25, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you addedHamat Gader to WikiProject Nudity, but the article doesn't mention nudity. I was going to perform the assessment for WP Nudity, but there was no info to do that. I was just wondering if you planned on expanding the article to include this topic?Demt1298 (talk)15:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Demt1298[reply]

Actually, I added the WikiProjects covering the main article forhot spring. WikiProject Nudity covers several topics on bathing.Dimadick (talk)15:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Fictional elements introduced in 1902 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your recent additions to the talk pageTalk:Tamam Shud case.

I suspect you really meant to add those things to the talk pageTalk:Somerton Man.

--07:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)DavidCary (talk)07:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are also covered by WikiProjects.Dimadick (talk)07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you, all good. I hope you agree with me that if those categorization templates are on a redirect page, they should *also* be on the page they redirect to. I was (mistakenly) pointing out they were *only* on the redirect page. I see now that those categorization templates are *also* on the "Talk:Somerton Man". Apparently I missed them because they are hidden behind a "collapsed" Wikiproject template until I hit the "show" button. Thank you again! --DavidCary (talk)00:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Corrupt 1944 chartI just saw my posts that you pasted on 1940s In Music talk page. Is there a problem I should address?Tillywilly17 (talk)13:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually trying to delete a disruptive message from an anonymous user, which is why my most recent edit is a deletion. I am not certain whether I accidentally duplicated text in the talk page, but I have made no proposed changes to the article.Dimadick (talk)13:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks these are our charts, not mine, and I am extremely sensitive to others. I would rather not make judgments like this myself. Any changes or suggestions, 1920-1950, I have all the numbers and research, just let me know-DaveTillywilly17 (talk)17:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but the man is never going to sleep with you. So stop brown-nosing him and trying to protect him from criticism.2600:6C5E:267F:F3DF:E92C:90FB:54E0:328F (talk)15:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dimadick thinks he’s smarter than everyone else. It it would be great if someone humbled him.76.67.70.150 (talk)00:47, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dimadick! First off, thank you very much for adding many more countries who have a 'year in television' article series to theTemplate:C21 year in topic. One thing I have noticed though is that the template appears to be getting pretty long with the addition of the new countries, and the fact that many of the countries which are now on there such as Belgium, Brazil, Croatia, and Denmark do not have a very large article series, and many of their pages have no citations. This has thus put more red links on the template for many of the years, and with the template being highly viewed, I was trying to think of a way to fix this.

I'm thinking besides listing the all countries which have their own year in television series in parentheses beside the link to2022 in television, I could make a template for them instead which would change by year, acting similarly to something like [Year in Europe|2022 ]. The template's use would theoretically be on every 'year in television' page. I would absolutely be willing to put in the work to make something like this happen, making the template and making sure it is placed where it is needed. It would be a big project, but it is something I have been brainstorming about for awhile, and I think it could look good. Do you have an opinion on this? I felt it would only be right to ask you because 1. you added many of the countries making me aware that the year in television series was larger than I previously thought, and 2. because you have been on Wikipedia longer than me and have more experience. So what is your opinion on this? Is there anything that needs be changed or clarified first? I would be happy to know. Thanks!Johnson524 (Talk!)16:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I realized a couple of years ago that we have an ever-increasing number of "years in television" lists which are difficult to find, and have few articles linking to them. I have been periodically adding them to the year templates just to avoid their near-orphan status. If you can find a better solution to make their presence known to readers and editors, go ahead. As for the number of articles, we actually have more articles in this format for Belgium and Denmark than the United States. For some reason,List of years in American television goes no further than 1971.Dimadick (talk)16:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support and information! It is kind of a shame to see some of these articles get lost in obscurity because of no easy way to learn about them and that they exist, so hopefully this template will make them more readily able to find. Thank you for your quick response!Johnson524 (Talk!)21:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1679 in Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!03:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made the descriptions, which were largely unsourced and partially written in an in-universe style, more concise and matter-of-fact. What's wrong with that?Colonel Knight Rider (talk)05:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The plot section is already stripped of any information on the characters. What you did makes the page incomprehensible.Dimadick (talk)05:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does making something more concise by taking out of the Cast section a lot of what reads like an expanded description of the plot make it harder to understand?Colonel Knight Rider (talk)16:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Concision" typically translates to "uninformative". Every time I hear someone making an article more concise, it typically means that that they have gutted the article and excised key information. Single-sentence descriptions hardly inform readers who the characters are, or what is their role in the wider context of the story. Normally we would reserve such details for a list article on the characters, but this film does not have such a list.Dimadick (talk)17:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn’t exactly call half the info there “key,” but perhaps we could come to a compromise wherein characters are amply described as you so desire, but does not include what they do in the plot (which I see a lot of). Is that acceptable?Colonel Knight Rider (talk)17:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I am less interested in reiterating the plot, and more interested in describing character traits.Dimadick (talk)17:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1991 computer-animated films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!02:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Fictional elements introduced in 1851 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1760s in Greece indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedThe Pied Piper of Guadalupe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGuadalupe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Films directed by Mark Quod indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user said;"What she said is accurate. The entire anti-abortion movement is aimed to take control of women's bodies, not to protect lives. Dimadick (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2022" on this page; Talk:Stacey Abrams - Wikipedia.

Any comment or edit by this user -- on the topic of abortion, or women's rights -- should be regarded with extreme suspicion. This person has obvious bias.24.57.55.50 (talk)18:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you created 17 navboxes for presidents that did exist before August. Was this something you had on your mind for awhile or did you see the list on my sandbox page? Just curious.WikiCleanerMan (talk)20:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see your list. I had createdTemplate:George H. W. Bush back in 2012, and I hoped that someone else would be working on the rest of the missing templates. My watchlist notified me that the Bush template had been updated, but then I noticed that over 10 presidents did not have templates.Dimadick (talk)06:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for creating them. I was going to do them for the presidents you created. I've been doing something similar on my sandbox for world leaders. --WikiCleanerMan (talk)18:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good, there is nothing unique about the significance of American presidents. We just have more spin-off articles.Dimadick (talk)18:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Archaeology of Chad indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Dimadick (talk)19:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The previous version was a laundry list of political and military events which did not even mention the concept. The current version only includes articles which specifically discuss the concept.Dimadick (talk)19:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What articles are tagged with the category is not what is at issue. The category itself was XfD'd as "Delete". Do not recreate it. There are other avenues for contesting deletion discussions. -UtherSRG(talk)20:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So what the heck is at issue if not the uncategorized articles? We have a book of predictions about the Second Cold War, an article connecting a 2010sarms race to the concept, a coalition of countries as geopolitical rivals to China, and a foreign policy in Russia which is thought as having terminated thePax Europaea.Dimadick (talk)20:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can readthe deletion discussion. If you disagree, the first line says to go toWP:DELREV. You may discuss it there. -UtherSRG(talk)20:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did read it, before recreating the category. The discussion specifically addressed the placement of theAnnexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, theWar in Donbas (2014–2022), and thePoisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in the category, while their inclusion was not supported by the then-available sources. I included none of these articles.Dimadick (talk)20:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the deletion of the category, please go toWP:DELREV. -UtherSRG(talk)21:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried to revise the page on Telamonian Ajax, but you deleted my modification. The sources that are quoted are inadequate. Tzetzes is a 12th century AD source, not an archaic or classical Greek one! Moreover, the book I referred to is the new reference book on the hero and has been published with Oxford University press. It's be grateful if you could keep the revisions. It improves the entry.87.74.8.220 (talk)23:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections if you want to replace a source. But the notification on my watchlist notes that multiple sources have been removed.Dimadick (talk)23:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Murder of Sarah Payne—has beenproposed formerging with another article. If you are interested, please participate inthe merger discussion. Thank you.GoldenBootWizard276 (talk)19:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youvandalize Wikipedia, as you did atCategory:Fictional wizards.2001:44C8:4722:3F85:63B9:A19B:9ED3:260 (talk)12:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dimadick,

I know you have edited and monitored the article page on Badarian culture. However,there has been recent disruptive editing from a user, LouisBStevenson who continues to remove content repeatedly and has ignored warnings/rules on this. Could you possibly assist in this case ?WikiUser4020 (talk)13:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't you notifyWikipedia:Requests for page protection instead?Dimadick (talk)13:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1825 establishments in Peru indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1825 in Peru indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!18:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Santas's Workshop2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.(Oinkers42) (talk)05:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edit request was regular Tate related disruption, so I removed the whole section, including your response. Just giving you a heads up, since I removed your comment when I removed the section.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)19:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've had to revert a couple of your recent edits which added grandparent taxon categories to articles about taxa which had their own categories. The last one wasMayfly, which is rightly marked as the owner of [[Category:Mayflies| ]], i.e. that is the taxon categorisation sorted. Adding the next category up - Mayflies/Ephemeroptera belong inside the Palaeoptera - is unnecessary and wrong, as the Mayflies category is marked as belonging to that group. All the best,Chiswick Chap (talk)18:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The pageCategory:Films set in the 1763 has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of thecriteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion atCategories for discussion, or atdisambiguation categories. (Seesection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion atWikipedia:Deletion Review.Liz^Read!Talk!02:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2nd-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:3rd-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:4th-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:5th-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:6th-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:7th-century BC Japanese monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:33, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:31st-century BC Sumerian kings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:32nd-century BC Sumerian kings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:33rd-century BC Sumerian kings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:34th-century BC Sumerian kings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2nd-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:3rd-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:4th-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:5th-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:5th century BC in Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:6th-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:6th century BC in Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:7th-century BC Japanese people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:7th century BC in Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:25th-century BC murdered monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:34th-century BC rulers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!21:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:34th-century BC people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!22:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? I just created a new page on an obscure Hanna-Barbera item,Hanna-Barbera's Christmas Sing-A-Long!. However, I need some help with improving it.Visokor (talk)06:35, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How am I supposed to help? I have never heard of this album, and I do not know if it is covered in histories ofHanna-Barbera.Dimadick (talk)07:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I completely forgot it was actually a direct-to-video special from 1989. The album came a few years later in 1991.Visokor (talk)13:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I placed a partial block on an IP range, which will hopefully stop that harassment.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)14:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it was getting really annoying.Dimadick (talk)14:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Annoyed is a kinda strong word, no?

Also, tell ScottishFinnishRadish I'm sorry I called him ScottishFinnishRUBBISH the other day.. but he's a sport, he took it much better than you today.

Annoyed? lol. Irritated, pestered, distracted, maybe... but annoyed? C'MON MAN, lol— Precedingunsigned comment added by105.161.82.233 (talk)16:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry.

But I think you're kinda laying it on thick there. Don't block my IP again please.

See ya around the block. Tell ScottishFinnishGuy to keep keeping it real.

196.108.155.28 (talk)16:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)LauraLoomerFinnaDragSOMEBODY[reply]

Quite the sensitive guy indeed. Lord have mercy on Dimadick.Theologism (talk)17:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, here's a new category that I created that you can add to your userpage.Category:Wikipedians who have earned the 100,000 edits award.Davidgoodheart (talk)20:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you very much for recently creating many (all?) of the missing U.S. presidential navboxes. A labor of love. I just discovered Van Buren's and Harding's, and moved them out of the navbox cages on their principal pages and added them to a few listed articles. A large job ahead: distribution of the navboxes (I'll do quite a few of them) to their listed pages. Would you please make a list of the presidential navboxes you've created to give an idea of the scope of this distribution? Thanks.Randy Kryn (talk)11:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember them all, I just covered every missing president. The first navbox I created wasTemplate:George H. W. Bush back in 2012.Dimadick (talk)11:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Every one? Nice work. I meant the recent ones, such as Harding and Van Buren (I'm assuming Bush has been distributed since, guess I've never checked). A team should be assembled. I'll do Harding, McKinley, and Van Buren page distributions and then look for more, but at a minimum may I ask that you check which ones aren't in visible space on their principal pages (Harding and Van Buren's weren't in view on their articles).Randy Kryn (talk)11:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I placed all of the templates with the other hidden templates at the bottom.Dimadick (talk)11:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's how I found Van Buren and moved it to visible space. These should not be hidden away on the principal pages. Anyway, I'll work on McKinley now, that should take some time. This is like the joy of finding a gold mine, but the work that it still needs mining. I don't know if we've ever communicated before but I've seen and run across your work for years, so many thanks again for all you've done.Randy Kryn (talk)11:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You did everybody. The Andrew Jackson navbox and the rest, nice work, great additions to Wikipedia's presidential navbox collection. I think I've got them all moved into visible space on their namesake article, and have distributed the William McKinley template to its entries (am working on Van Buren).Randy Kryn (talk)03:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, have distributed the 17 navboxes to their linked articles. Thanks, learned a lot about some of the U.S. presidents in the process.Randy Kryn (talk)14:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you readded the WikiProject Logic/Philosophy tag toMaricopa County Sheriff's Office controversies. I understand that the article forcontroversyin general is covered by the Logic task force. However, none of the other pages aboutspecific controversies are tagged as belonging to the logic task force, and I think we can both agree that this article does not relate to logic or philosophy. As a new and passionate member of the Logic WikiProject, I want to keep it as focused as possible on its intended topic, so do you think you could agree to this change? Best regards,NicolinoChess31415926 (talk)23:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dimadick,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—Moops^⋠T⋡20:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

—Moops^⋠T⋡20:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Film series intoduced in 1897 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Populated places disestablished in 1752 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't Priscilla have 4 grandchildren?67.86.9.151 (talk)17:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:2022 disestablishments in Croatia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I would like to thank you for helping me with the "Branches Of Neuroscience" category. As a gift, here is a kitten for you! Enjoy!

Sirtinia (talk)17:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read back in 2020, when she first ran for Congress, that she had gotten a GED during the primary, so she hadn't graduated HS by that point. I just checked Snopes, that confirmed that she had gotten one before the November election that year. So she would have been 33 at that point. On the other hand, her honesty has been repeatedly questioned. Back then I'd read that she'd charged her campaign for driving 38,000 miles while running. At the time, the federal reimbursement for mileage was about $.55/mile. So she was living close to the 40th parallel. At that latitude, that would have been the equivalent of driving twice around the world. If memory serves, and I'm not going to claim my memory is all that good, she bought a Cadillac Escalade, which cost $75 grand back then. Could be why she was given to late pay for the cooks and waitpersons. If she wasn't paying employee taxes, that's probably a criminal offense. I also read recently that her landlord refused to renew her lease of the restaurant.Activist (talk)20:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I hadn't read the article in a couple of years before I'd posted to it this week, and found that the GED and lease were covered in it. I could have saved both of us a minute. I did find she'd won her election last year by less than 600 votes. I thought it was half that, but I may have gotten that notion from early returns. I know the district having traveled there before and after redistricting.Activist (talk)21:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused aboutthis edit, can you explain it to me? I don't see how pasting in the definition ofbird helps to explain the inclusion criteria of the category. What am I missing? Thanks. --Jameboy (talk)02:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing that editors keep on adding wrong articles in categories due to misconceptions abouttaxonomy.Dimadick (talk)06:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, thanks. What sort of misconceptions are there? Confusing insects with arachnids etc.? --Jameboy (talk)13:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason,pterosaur articles get added to bird-related categories.Dimadick (talk)18:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paranormal places in Sweden has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Estopedist1 (talk)16:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedHrid Majharey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSoothsayer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rulers of Lesbos has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)21:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Book series introduced in 1751 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century BC Kings of Israel (united monarchy) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)12:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Mass media franchises introduced in 1751 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!22:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Book series introduced in the 1750s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!22:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1750s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!22:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1777 in Hungary indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!03:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1770s disestablishments in Hungary indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!05:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDavid Herbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCastletown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Conglomerate companies disestablished in 2006 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!18:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectCh'al Andar has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11 § Ch'al Andar until a consensus is reached.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}03:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Life Begins for Andy Panda1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAmma (deity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDesert fox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Sunpyre2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works attributed to David has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Iskandar323 (talk)09:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1742 songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:13th century in the Grand Duchy of Moscow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Sunpyre1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)09:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedThe Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWashington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Neoclassical architecture in Israel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!02:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dimadick,Please advise me why you removed my 'New "Theory"' and "Additional Support for the above "Theory"' from the Wikipedia page "Millennial Day Theory"?Ggiraldi (talk)12:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never removed anything from that article. Based on the revision history, your additions were reverted byUser:MOTORAL1987.Dimadick (talk)15:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dimadick,

I am sorry for not seeing MOTORAL1987 as the one who removed my addition edits.

Sincerely yours,

GgiraldiGgiraldi (talk)14:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century viceregal rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)21:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Conglomerate companies disestablished in 2006 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!02:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4th-century BC Seleucid monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)16:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:African humid period § Younger Dryas category.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk)18:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century BC Kings of Syria has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century rulers of Brittany has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)22:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the reversion and re-reversion of the infobox inPan (god), and I'm not sure what your reason for preferring the older version was. There may well be accounts where Pan's not the son of Hermes and Dryope, but that's by far the best-known, and I don't recall any involving Aphrodite being his mother, although I'm not saying there couldn't be such an account. But there are so many minor variations on otherwise well-known Greek myths, that I'm not sure the infobox is the place to include them all. Surely the best-known version, or if there's a second widely-known one , then two, should be enough. The words "many variations" probably can go without saying, since they could apply to almost any detail in any infobox involving Greek mythology; and having them there seems to demand an explanation which is better dealt with in the body of the article. "Silenus" is the usual English form, not "Silenos". So my recommendation would be to leave the edits, instead of reverting them again—to me they look like an improvement, streamlining and regularizing. There's plenty of room in the article to discuss variants.P Aculeius (talk)04:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's also nothing on the page about Aphrodite, so that's a bit of a breach ofMOS:INFOBOX.Iskandar323 (talk)06:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the IP's edits are all improvements.Paul August☎13:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: I've just undone your latest revert (here), could you please explain yourself.Paul August☎14:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The user keeps changingSilenos (Greek) toSilenus (Latin).Dimadick (talk)14:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't see "Silenos" in English, any more than "Dionysos"—most Greek names from classical antiquity are spelled following Latin orthography in English.P Aculeius (talk)14:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: Yes exactly. And there were other good edits that the IP made which you also reverted. Why did you revert those?14:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reason I revert unsourced changes. Because the version is not supported by any source.Dimadick (talk)15:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that makes sense. Do you mean a source for writing it as "Silenus"? There is no source (or mention) given in the article for Pan being a child of Aphrodite, which you added back. –Michael Aurel (talk)15:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: The IP didn't need to add sources, since they didn't add any content.Paul August☎15:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about Aphrodite, but the article onDryope mentions no connection to Pan.Dimadick (talk)15:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimadick: The IP didn't add Dryope, they just changed the spelling from "Driope" to "Dryope" (while removing the redirect). Also note that Dryope is mentioned (with sources) as one of the names given for Pan's mother. As for Aphrodite the IPremoved it, as the mother of Pan, which is appropriate since no source is given for this.Paul August☎15:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, looking at the sources for Dryope being Pan's mother, those cited at Pan's article don't seem to support that parentage (but rather the parentage with Penelope as the mother).Dryope (daughter of Dryops) mentions that Pan is her son by Hermes, but looking at theHomeric Hymn itself, it states that Pan's mother is the daughter of Dryops ("a surging desire had come upon him to unite in love with Dryops’ lovely-tressed girl"), but doesn't seem to name the daughter in question, and Gantz, p. 110 and Hard, p. 215 also state that she isn't named. But while this could go to improving the article, this doesn't justify your reversion, since, as pointed out, the IP didn't add Dryope, and simply removed the redirect there. –Michael Aurel (talk)16:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dryope (daughter of Dryops) mentions" So the article links to the wrong Dryope?Dimadick (talk)16:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The point I was trying to make was that I think the articleDryope (daughter of Dryops) is incorrect (from the quick look I've done here), and so neither page should be linked at Pan. However, as I said, this isn't relevant to your reversion of the IP's edits. –Michael Aurel (talk)16:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, since I thought that he/she changed the parentage to an unrelated person. I changed the link toDryope (daughter of Dryops) per your proposal.Dimadick (talk)16:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You thought that "Dryope" was an unrelated person to "Driope"? (both linked to the same page) –Michael Aurel (talk)16:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the first wrong redirect I have encountered based on similarly-sounding names which have different spellings in the original texts. It was quite possible that Driope was an entirely different character.Dimadick (talk)16:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you reverted the IP's edits because maybeDryope could have potentially been different toDriope in the original texts (with nothing to suggest this, and it spelled "Dryope" in the actual body of the article), without checking those sources yourself? This is ignoring your re-addition of Aphrodite, and your changing of the spelling of Silenus. I won't bother to argue this further, there is no point. I will go to the articles involved and see if I can address the issues I brought up in my comment above, trying to make sure that our presentation of the parentages is in line with the sources we are working from. I didnot propose we try and fix the issue by instead just linking toDryope (daughter of Dryops) instead, but I will go and see if the matter can be resolved by properly sourcing the statements we're making.

There would have been nothing wrong with simply admitting you made a mistake, after the matter was raised. –Michael Aurel (talk)17:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider it a mistake. We get vandals regularly changing spellings, names, and identifications in all kinds of historical articles.Dimadick (talk)17:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century German emperors has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)10:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century heads of state of Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)10:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century heads of state of France has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)10:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century heads of state of Greece has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)10:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dimadick! Since I see you've worked on somewhat related categories before, I thought you might have some input on the deletion discussion currently going on overCategory:Novels set in fictional villages. —the Man in Question(in question)04:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Murdered Azerbaijani children indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!01:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on1945 in American television requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at thehelp orreference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please seeWikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be onnotable subjects and should provide references toreliable sources thatverify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Tirishan (talk)19:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on it, I just started.Dimadick (talk)19:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have successfully stopped that from happening on mine. I work from a subpage of my user space, and nobody bothers me. When I'm ready, I either do a page move to the article space, or copy and paste it to the new article space. You could name your sub page whatever works for you.

User:Maile66/Marker is an example of the most recent article I did that on. I probably should blank it, because I did create the actual article a day or so ago. That article is now in Main Space, and I can re-use this user space again.

Note "This is a Wikipedia user page." template:Userpage|noindex=yes" I have at the top. I keep that at the top of any subpages of my user space, It really helps. Good luck.— Maile (talk)20:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rulers of Monaco has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)18:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Regents of Egypt has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)15:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did toYggdrasil, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia'scategorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article'sverifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.TylerBurden (talk)18:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already know all that. What is your point?Dimadick (talk)18:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you repeatedly adding irrelevant categories to it, then? AlsoMOS:OVERLINKS.TylerBurden (talk)18:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onYggdrasil. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.TylerBurden (talk)18:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article already links toFraxinus excelsior, which has an entire section devoted toYggdrasil. And I doubt it is overlinking to link to terms mentioned in the article. They are not familiar to the average user.Dimadick (talk)18:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No it does not, you linked to Eurasia and mankind, those are general terms.TylerBurden (talk)18:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so it linked through a pipe, thanks for explaining that, the links though remain overlinks.TylerBurden (talk)18:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not restored the links, so I am not certain why you are insisting on them.Dimadick (talk)18:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you now accused me of "disruptive editing", it's on you to explain your edits, if you are adding an entire category based on a piped link, explain it so it is clear. Open a discussion on the talk page and explain, don't edit war. You argued for the links again, so I don't see how me explaining to you that they are general terms is insisting.TylerBurden (talk)18:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasia is a specific geographic term with its own article. Overlinking would be to terms that the average reader is expected to already know. And I still have not restored the link or made any modifications to the text since yesterday.Dimadick (talk)18:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what? All blue links have articles, Eurasia is two continents, people tend to be familiar with continents. I am not saying you have added the links again, am I? I am responding to your statements about them here. Either way, try using edit summaries, they help with avoiding misunderstandings like this, and more importantly, don't edit war. Are we done here or are you going to accuse me of something else, or argue that somehow continents and mankind are terms people aren't familiar with?TylerBurden (talk)18:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Azerbaijani children indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!23:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10th-century Kings of the Romans has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)15:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your assignment of this article to the History project, andpace your edit comment "Reverted. Yep and it a large part of the history of fantasy.", because you have conflated the "history of fantasy", i.e. the real-world history of Tolkien's (large) contribution to fantasy over many years through his Middle-earth writings, and the purely fictional history (in-universe) of Arda. This mock-historical backdrop has exactly nothing to do with the "history of fantasy" which, I repeat, exists in the real world, embodied in books, games, and films published in the 20th and 21st centuries, not in the "First Age of Arda" or whatever. I do hope this is clear. If not, I'm happy to discuss here or on the article's talk page. All the best,Chiswick Chap (talk)16:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not conflated anything. Tolkien's works are an example ofmythopoeia, a key element in modernfantasy.Dimadick (talk)16:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Careful. All his fantasy works exemplify it, but unlike several other Middle-earth articles, this one is not about mythopoeia and has nothing at all to do with either the real-world process of writing fantasy, nor with real-world time scales. If we were to sweep any article about any aspect of in-universe fantasy into the net of History, we would have to include every

Middle-earth article. Very few of them are about either the creative process or the wider history of fantasy, and this article is not one of them.Chiswick Chap (talk)16:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:States and territories established in the 5th millennium BC indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!22:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:13th-century rulers of Monaco has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)13:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:16th-century BC women rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)19:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4th-century BC women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)19:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:3rd-century BC women rulers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Nederlandse Leeuw (talk)19:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Fictional elements introduced in 1952 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.Liz^Read!Talk!07:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan.Qwerfjkltalk16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments on the discussion of Irish emigrants.John Pack Lambert (talk)22:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1890 supernatural films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!04:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]