Archives

Archive 1

@HeartGlow30797: Under the reward board I choose September 1 and looked under ineligible. I found Ferenc Gyulay and there was not a reference for his death date. I have provided a reference for the death date on that article. Hope this is what you were looking for.Demt1298 (talk)17:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HeartGlow30797: andHarriet Shaw Weaver's birthdate,Othmar Schoeck birthdate, andGiacomo Torelli birthdate for 1 September. ````Demt1298 (talk)17:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Well deserved.Edward-Woodrow •talk19:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward-WoodrowThank You!Demt1298 (talk)19:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please clip your links toNewspapers.com in citations; otherwise, they are inaccessible to readers without access and are liable to link rot.SounderBruce05:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed you edit quite a few USL pages and so I wanted to mention that I started an unofficial USL editor project/groupin one of my userpages. Letting it be a collective place to chart out goals that folks interested in USL can work on individually or collaboratively.

Feel free to edit the page(s) with your own goals or just use it as a reference point for anything you may want to work on.

If nothing else, I appreciate all the edits you do! Happy holidays!Christiangamer7 (talk)00:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Christiangamer7 Wow! Strong work you have there. I have only glanced at it, but think it looks good and would like to participate.

Thanks for the invite. I will take a closer look when I have a chance

If you have any constructive criticism for me, let me know. I love to learn more about editing. Happy Holidays!Demt1298 (talk)00:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GingerLines, here's your requested citation source, taken directly from Wikipedia's page on Lynn Family stadium, the home field of LouCityFC, Type

Soccer-specific stadium

Capacity

11,700 seated, 15,304 with standing room

Record attendance

14,673 (Soccer; Louisville City FC vs. Tampa Bay Rowdies; August 12, 2022)70.187.140.172 (talk)01:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi70.187.140.172. I see you are trying to contact me regarding the discussion surrounding your edits toUSL Division One. In the future please feel free to either reply to the note I left onyour talk page or create a topic onmy talk page.

As both myself and @Demt1298 have pointed out several times, information from a secondary Wikipedia page is not a sufficient source for the change you have been trying to make toUSL Division One. If you believeLouisville City FC should be included, you must find anexternal reliable source that says as such,not another wikipedia page.

And, in the interest of making sure you are fully aware, your recent and repeated unsourced edits while ignoring the warnings posted on your talk page could lead to a suspension of your editing abilities. I'd recommend either joining the ongoing discussion onthe article's talk page or finding a reliable source. I'm happy to assist you in determining of a source is reliable if you'd like. Cheers,gingerlines (talk)15:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just expanded the English article onChristian Günter. If you have any further suggestions, don´t hesitate to edit or contact me on my talk page. Thank you in advance.Wiki User 730 (talk)16:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for collecting more than 100 points during theWikiProject Unreferenced articles'sFEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – –DreamRimmer (talk)18:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For good work during WP: FEB24Davidindia (talk)15:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Citation Barnstar
		messageDavidindia (talk)15:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering why the format you use is better? the other 28 pages use the format I used. seems we should be consistent on all 29 teams. Thank youTomrtn (talk)21:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomrtn This is the direct quote off theWP Football - "Concerns have been raised about the football box collapsible and its compliance with MOS:ACCESS. For further information and the most recent discussions, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 238#Football Season articles and football results articles." It can be found hereWP Football/used on many pages. It referencesMOS:ACCESS, which discusses formatting that gives readers and editors with visual impairment the ability to use screen readers to read articles on Wikipedia. I understand your concern for MLS articles, but I think WP Football should be the standard for football pages regardless of league. There are thousands of pages that use the older format and I wouldn't go back and correct those personally, but moving forward I think editors should use the most up to date recommendations on Wikipedia to provide the best access to most people. I would appreciate hearing your input on this.Demt1298 (talk)21:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OKTomrtn (talk)21:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it may be better but I think all MLS pages should use same format, would be best to revert back to the old way until all pages changed. Maybe we can start a discussion on it with other editors.Tomrtn (talk)21:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomrtn I appreciate that feedback, but why would we want all of the MLS pages to not be in line with WP Football. I agree with starting the conversation with whatever group of editors you think control MLS articles, but I would use the 2024 Austin FC season page as the example of what WP Football recommends. That allows two things. One people will have a visual reference of how it would look on MLS articles and allow them to comment on likes and dislikes based on that visual reference. Secondly, it would allow the editors to use the 2024 Austin FC season pages formatting to make the adjustment to the other MLS articles. I think if we just revert because other MLS articles aren't in line with WP Football and MOS:ACESS recommendation, it won't lead to progress in getting other editors to adjust those articles to be in line with current recommendations. I know that other leagues also have this issue, because in the Premier League, the2023–24 Manchester City F.C. season article uses collapsible boxes and the2023–24 Manchester United F.C. season articles uses current format. I oppose the idea of regressing editing recommendations for standardization. We need to encourage other editors to bring their articles up to current standards and in turn provide a better product for those who use electronic adjuncts for their wikipedia experience.Demt1298 (talk)22:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Logan Z Man 2022! I wanted to talk about the boxscores for the 2024 Chattanooga FC season page. I kinda prefer the collapsible Box scores as it allows you to see the opponent's goal scorers and the penalty kicks as well. Is it okay if I put collapsible Boxscores in underneath the schedule page? That is just how I do the schedules and scores.Logan Z Man 2022! (talk)20:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Logan Z Man 2022! Thank you for reaching out. I am aware alot of editors are more comfortable with the collapsible box scores because they have been using them for an extended period of time. But,the club season template has the concerns for the collapsible box scores template having significantMOS:ACCESS issues for Wikipedia users whom utilize screen readers and fails to meet compliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Also,Wikipedia:NOTSTATS suggests that season pages should not just become a listing of stats related to the subject. I personally don't think this second concern is a great concern in the collapsible box scores, but it is still a concern. There is more discussion onWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 238#Football Season articles and football results articles about the concerns with this template. I know the new template loses thing like cards and opponents whom score, but do those stats matter to the club the article is about? I would discourage the idea of putting the collapsible boxscore underneath the new template and instead start or add to the discussion on WikiProject Football about the fact these stats don't fit into the new format.Demt1298 (talk)21:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which islegally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account isfour days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may behidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.BLAIXX03:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaixx Thank you for the feedback, I appreciate being able to learn more about WikiPedia and want to say thank you for treating this situation as a learning experience for me rather then a negative experience. I do have a question. I see you used a process to merge histories. I know it seems like that is the right answer, but would it be bad if I undid my editing and went through the move process instead, so I can see how that process is completed?Demt1298 (talk)12:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! Thank you for being receptive to feedback.

That's a good question about undoing your changes and completing the page move the correct way but that is not possible anymore. You have the user permission to move pages but only if the target page (new title) does not exist. Since “CFU Club Shield” exists, you would not be able to move “CONCACAF Caribbean Shield” on top of it, even if you blanked the page. In that situation, you would have to go throughWP:RMTR (uncontroversial technical requests). Since we need an administrator to fix this up either way, I say we stick with the history merge approach. Let me know if you have any other questions about moving pages.BLAIXX15:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaixx Darn! Ok, I will learn from this and do it correctly next time. Thank you for doing the behind the scenes work to fix my mistake and merge the history.Demt1298 (talk)15:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt1298 -- I see that you have requested a 20-minute assessment of the articleAnnika Sörenstam as part of the June Women in Green "Good Article" editathon, but it appears that this article has already met and passed a formal GA review & reassessment (it is currently rated "A-Class", which is actually one level higher than GA!), so this article is not the best choice for working towards Good Article status. Consequently, I'm going to remove your assessment request for Sörenstam, but I encourage you to choose another article (one that hasn't yet reached GA or above) and request a 20-minute assessment for that instead. There are definitely many other biographies about women in sports that would benefit from some concentrated improvements. Best,Alanna the Brave (talk)13:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanna the Brave Thank you, I should have reread the content assessment prior to asking. I though A was below GA, awaiting the final GA assessment. Thank you!Demt1298 (talk)13:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts to clean up{{citation needed}} tags. However, I worry about the reliability ofThe Roar. Our article about it says some material is written by experts and some by fans. Their website emphasizes that "anyone can contribute" and have their work featured alongside that of sports journalists.[1] Does theuser-generated content undergo the same fact checking as the professional? Is Tigerbill44, the author of the sourceyou added toAnisur Rahman (cricketer), reliable?

Examining closely what Tigerbill44 wrote, parts of it are strikingly similar to what was already in our Anisur Rahman article at the time:

Possibly both Wikipedia andThe Roar are based on some third source, but unless it can be identified I think we have to assume thatThe Roar is acircular source that should be removed. --Worldbruce (talk)14:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce DoneDemt1298 (talk)18:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive! You scored 1011 points while adding citations to articles duringWikiProject Reliability's first{{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this Order of the Lesser Scribe of Wikipedia (olsw). Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk)22:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I threw some items on the talk pages however I placed everything that I thought was relevant on the main space with references. Is there something specific you identified?Libro0 (talk)23:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Libro0No I was just wondering if there was a reference I hadn't found to use.Demt1298 (talk)23:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those scores came from a multitude of sources. I only put scores on main space that had multiple sources that matched. One of the most frustrating things about that period is conflicting data which happens more than you think clear through the 1980's. I am a stickler for accuracy and unfortunately I encountered errors in modern sources . I noticed you were adding link to references. I have seen other people do that though I have mixed feelings about that because some go to a pay wall or some go to nothing. Either way none of mine have links because when I did the research over twenty years ago it all came from painstakingly pouring through agonizingly small or blurry print on microfilm. I still haven't got around to completing all the American Cup pages because took on too many projects though I promise to get to them soon. Anyway any improvements you see fit are extremely appreciated.Libro0 (talk)00:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate what you are saying. I am finding much of the same info the early history of soccer. I agree with avoiding the pay sites as much as possible, which is why I linked the newspapers.com link the way I did, it allows them to be linked and reviewed without being a pay member.Demt1298 (talk)00:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so I did review some of the edits to 1885 and I am going to have to revert at least one. One of the references is incorrect. I spent many years working on just that tournament and with 150% definitive proof there were only six teams entered and participated in that tournament not thirteen. No paper at that time says any different. There is a reason I do not use American Soccer Archives, RSSSF, or Melvin Smith's "Evolvements" book --> errors. Even Spalding had a few.Libro0 (talk)00:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have concern about this, because I also have another reference that states 13 teams entered and the original page didn't have any reference that directly said six teams entered, even your reversion is unreferenced. I don't think we should be removing something referenced without replacing it with a reference that says six teams entered. I will have to mark it with a reference needed due to this.Demt1298 (talk)00:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Libro0 Soccer in a football world : the story of America's forgotten game by David Wangerin also reference thirteen teams entering the 1885 American Cup, for your review.Demt1298 (talk)00:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I added the reference. Yes I have reviewed those items. I greatly admire the amount of work done by all these historians and researchers however what I saw in a number of these is compounded errors. People kept referencing the same thing. I went all the way back and scoured the libraries of all the contemporary sources I could to verify these claims. I have also had discussions with some of these historians and clarified some of these issues.Libro0 (talk)00:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed a few more pages and while I encourage people to contribute to this era because I have been working alone here, I want to caution about sources as above. I worked for a long time to bring information that was not on the internet out in the open with as much accuracy and completeness as possible. You are not the first person that has pointed modern sources to me. I'm seeing sources that I spent a lot of time to remove and replace with contemporary ones only to have them reintroduced. In particular 'This Year In American Soccer'. While I have used Spalding a few times it was only as a last resort. If you want to throw in [citation needed] here and there, I happy to dig through my notes and other parchment. I am not trying to kick you in the teeth but I have had a number of non researchers challenge my info. It seems that I am the only one that has challenged the modern authors. They have all written outstanding books but they are not error free. Kind regards.Libro0 (talk)05:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work on finding sources that reference this time period of soccer. You in no way are kicking anyone in the teeth, even if you are attempting to suggest there is some form a research you have performed that is in some way better then other editors on Wikipedia. I do have concerns for you response in the fact you present it as if you own the articles in question and would resist their update with cited material. Reviewing the pages, some seems to provide large amounts of non-cited information (i.e. color of uniforms under the participant section of the 1888 American Cup article), and if references are found that counter this information, they should be updated with cited references. I believe when you are referring to the 'This Year in American Soccer' you might be talking about what can be found online at The Society of American Soccer History, but am not sure if that is what you are referring to. I understand a common belief that anything can be placed on the internet without reference, which is why what is written on Wikipedia is best when cited from a secondary source. But attempting to negate a contemporary reference when no historic reference is sourced in the article seems short-sighted. If historic references exist, articles would be improved with those references being notated with in-line citations. Hope this recommendations helps improve these articles that seem to lack appropriate citations.Demt1298 (talk)14:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly don’t claim ownership. I’m just trying to prevent errors because I’ve seen it explode. If it is in the article then I have read it in print. Nothing is made up. I put a reference for every game and elsewhere within reason. I spent an unreal amount of time cleaning up soccer history here because of all the indiscriminate copy pasting from rsssf and the archive from past editors. I have seen some people go overboard on the references and it starts to look hideous. But I get it, it’s not wrong. Give time to dig up the old notes. I’m working rugby right now.Libro0 (talk)15:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt1298, I just wanted to let you know that I have added thenew page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to thepage curation tools and can start patrolling pages from thenew pages feed. If you asked for this atrequests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance atWikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• AddWikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you useTwinkle,configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to thelist of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers atWikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone!HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Demt1298:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-longGood Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the themeAround the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) &Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of theWikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notificationshere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is so belated, hahaha, but yeah, I saw on your user page and just decided to drop a note. It's 17 days late, but please accept my well wishes. Happy editing,Vanderwaalforces (talk)08:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. It is appreciated.Demt1298 (talk)13:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice that this is an orphan page; it was not when I created it, but I note that someone basically "stole" it for another football club and moved it to this new name. So the links no longer point to it. I'm going to revert that nonsense, given that nobody mentioned it when doing it, but instead first tried to delete it (and was rebuffed).In Vitrio (talk)20:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part ofGlobal reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew atWP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself tom:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk)05:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link atMiddleton, Greater Manchester article,Sport section. Also, I removed TWO orphan tags, for May and September 2024.

Help to de-orphan articles.

1.WikiProject Orphanage - working to reduce the article backlog.

2.Wikipedia:Orphan - the completeHow-to Guide for Orphaned articles.

» De-orphaning articles is an important aspect ofbuilding the web.

Cheers,JoeNMLC (talk)17:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt1298, I just wanted to let you know that I have added thenew page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to thepage curation tools and can start patrolling pages from thenew pages feed. If you asked for this atrequests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance atWikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• AddWikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you useTwinkle,configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to thelist of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers atWikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone!_signed,Rosguill^talk14:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!Demt1298 (talk)14:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt1298, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk)12:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 100 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)15:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!Demt1298 (talk)15:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)15:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Demt1298 (talk)16:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles |November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with#NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later usingHashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Demt1298! I'm glad that you are joining theNovember 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk)12:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt1298. After reviewing your request, I haveenabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installingTwinkle orUltraviolet. It just adds a[Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision -that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revertclear and unambiguous cases of vandalismonly.Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something,ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, seeWikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on mytalk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?19:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for collecting more than 76.0 points during theWikiProject Unreferenced articles'sNOV24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! –DreamRimmer Alt (talk)17:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted forre-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Demt1298. You have new messages atTemplate:Did you know nominations/2024 MLS expansion draft.
Message added 02:21, 28 December 2024 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk ·contributions)02:21, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of2024 MLS expansion draft at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Narutolovehinata5 (talk ·contributions)09:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demt, hope all is well. I'm wondering why in the articleJackson Wälti, you put a tag saying it needs updated. The article seems to be updated to my knowledge, so I'd appreciate a bit of deeper insight on what I can do to fix the article.

Regards,Shmego (talk)21:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for conducting 147 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up!Hey man im josh (talk)18:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im joshThank you very muchDemt1298 (talk)00:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 5 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)19:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Demt1298:WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-longGood Article Editathon event in May 2025!

Running from May 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related toany and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a women's rights activist? Go for it. An Olympian gold medallist? Absolutely. A famous painting by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. We hope to see you there!

(You are receiving this message as you are on theWomen in Green mailing list. If you wish to opt out of receiving future messages, feel free to remove yourself from the list.)MediaWiki message delivery (talk)12:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Demt1298:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding amonth longBacklog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is toreduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may findCategory:AfC pending submissions by age orother categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may addCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

WikiProject Unreferenced articles |June 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with#JUN25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later usingHashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Demt1298! I'm glad that you are joining theJune 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk)04:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦Dr. Blofeld13:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for participating in theArticles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2900 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found atWP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! –DreamRimmer■01:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 10 points during the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)19:45, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A new wiki profile has been set up for Luke McCormick at Texoma FC but it is not linked to the texoma Wiki page I'm unsure of how to do this if you could help link it so the name is blue etc. Many Thanks.Martin Del (talk)08:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! - just noticed you're a{{User in Belize}} - I'm currently updatingWP:BELIZE (still in progress), but if you'd like, might be cool to add your name to 'Active members' in/Members, or provide any feedback atTalk#Reviving (no pressure though, and sorry if this is irrelevant in advance! :) -Asdfjrjjj (talk)05:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asdfjrjjj I have userbox that says I visited Belize, but do not stay there. Not sure why I'm on the user in Belize list from a userbox that says I visited. Userbox may need to be updated.Demt1298 (talk)20:05, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh no that's my bad, sorry, will keep in mind :) -Asdfjrjjj (talk)21:37, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2026 U.S. Open Cup qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNathan Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Demt1298:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding amonth-longGood Article Editathon event in October 2025!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the themeWhat Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk),Spookyaki (talk) &Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of theWikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notificationshere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 50 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Utopes(talk /cont)03:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Utopes(talk /cont)04:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Demt1298 for performing at least 25 re-reviews in the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Utopes(talk /cont)08:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dude, how are you? I see we share many interests... including the Zodiac... LOL ... Anyway, I don't know if it is allowed on WP, but I've been here for so long anyway... I mean, do you have Discord or any other contact form?... Just in case you ever do want to chat or work together on football articles, especially and most especially referees... ping me :-)CoryGlee (talk)20:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles |November 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with#NOV25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later usingHashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Demt1298! I'm glad that you are joining theNovember 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk)00:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Demt1298:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding amonth longBacklog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is toreduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may findCategory:AfC pending submissions by age orother categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may addCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.