NOTE! It is recommended to use English to create a new discussion, in order to give a chance to other users to give another reply after reading this. Foreign languages is not recommended and it should be discussed on Wikipedia with that own language.

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRelativity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kokotsakis polyhedron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Charlie (talk)09:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chazelle polyhedron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ToadetteEdit (talk)16:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSquare tiling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLattice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCommutative property, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDivision.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kalim114.122.137.218 (talk)21:15, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Equiprojective polyhedra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca^{talk to me!}06:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am inquiring about the logic behind the decision to remove my edit on the value of the internal solid angles of cubes in steradians. Where is this explained on the page before (the dihedral angle is not the same as the solid angle,so why would this be redudant)? It may be useful to have this information. Could you explain this decision a bit more?Ncgtr (talk)12:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncgtr My apologies. I think I misread this one, for not explaining what is the meaning of "internal solid angle". Do you have a better source for this, because MathWorld mentions the solid angle of a cube's face is${\displaystyle 2\pi /3}$?Dedhert.Jr (talk)01:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't have a direct source but AI mentions this. This is based on the fact that a sphere is covered by 4pi steradians, and the if the sphere is divided into 8 equal sections each would cover 4pi/8 or pi/2 steradians. The solid angle at the corner of the section at the center of the sphere would therefore be pi/2 steradians, and this corner is the same as the corners of a cube.Ncgtr (talk)01:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncgtr Now this is the problem that every Wikipedian uses AI for the sake of writing. In Wikipedia, it is required to providea reliable source for supporting the fact and verifiability. You might want to readthe background of this source for a long time.Dedhert.Jr (talk)02:02, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took "internal solid angle" to mean that which is to vertices as adihedral angle is to edges.—Tamfang (talk)21:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamfang that is what I am trying to describeNcgtr (talk)04:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story ·music ·places

Thank you today for your share in rescuingEmmy Noether as FA. --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCube you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)11:23, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you bythe GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helpingMatrix (mathematics) retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work!~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)14:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCube you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Cube andTalk:Cube/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)14:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCube you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cube for comments about the article, andTalk:Cube/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)18:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you bythe GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helpingAddition retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work!~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)16:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleRegular icosahedron isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKusma --Kusma (talk)19:08, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On10 August 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleCube, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that there are eleven ways(pictured) to unfold acube? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Cube. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Cube), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)00:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleRegular icosahedron hasfailed. Seethe review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKusma --Kusma (talk)16:22, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have gone ahead and fixed thescope=rows for this list. The proper way to use scopes are to put the scope rows in the spot of the row for what the list is meant for. It was in the number spot but the focus on the list isn't the number but on the actual solids. I hope this can help you for the future and for any future lists you decide to fix, make, or nominate! Thank you,Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥23:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo polyhedron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk)17:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toElongated gyrobifastigium. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing})05:44, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toStellated octahedron. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing})03:13, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMercury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dedhert.JrTurkikoko9 (talk)06:36, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageOctahedron, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Amissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)03:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]