Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Deb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This isDeb'stalk page, where you can send her messages and comments.
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29
This isDeb'stalk page, where you can send her messages and comments.
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29
NoticeComing here to ask why I deleted your article? Readthis page first...

If that doesn't help, read these FAQs.

1. Why did you delete my page when I hadn't finished writing it?

Answer: Don't create new articles unless you are sure they meet wikipedia's criteria, particularlynotability andverifiability. If you want to practice, there is thesandbox facility andWikipedia:Articles for creation where you can get a second opinion from a more experienced contributor. And if you really can't help yourself, use {{underconstruction}} so other people will know you are still working on it.

2. Why did you delete my page for advertising? I wasn't trying to advertise!

Answer: ReadWikipedia:NPOV for guidance on how to word an article so that it doesn't sound like an advertisement.

3. Why did you delete my page for advertising? It was about a non-profit organisation!

Answer: Non-profit organisations advertise all the time - it's still promotion and the rule applies to them just as it does to commercial bodies. See no 2 above.

4. Why did you delete my article without warning?

Answer: Because you are not entitled to a warning if you don't follow the guidelines. See no 1 above.

5. Why didn't you do a google search and find references for my article and put them in for me instead of just deleting it?

Answer: Because I don't have time to do the boring bits for you. I have enough boring bits of my own to work on, thank you.

6. You have a very interesting view of neutrality. The authors you give credence to have a definite point of view and you discount those that disagree.

Answer: There is of course no answer because this is not a question. It's a snide comment added by someone who doesn't understand the NPOV rule. Possibly a Ricardian revisionist.

And pleaseSIGN YOUR POSTS, otherwise I don't know who is asking me the question!


Archives:1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removedVanamonde93

Arbitration

  • Aftera motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections atWP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g.[[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

[edit]

Hi Deb. I just noticed evidence of block evasion with an account you blocked,Tzmediahouse. They createdDraft:Ebonny Musik, which you deleted as G11 and blocked them. The next day, another account popped up -TzolaTz - and recreated the same draft. Hardly coincidence, I think. --Drm310🍁 (talk)22:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been away on holiday and once again I wasn't able to log in on my phone. I'll have a look.Deb (talk)14:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting Speedy Deletion

[edit]

Deb I want to challenge your speedy deletion here,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghulam_Rasool_Dehlvi as I beleive that subject atleast passes;WP: Basic ; and A4 does not applicable here as it was significantly different from the deleted version, as far as I can see from Wikipedia mirror website. Please undelete it per contested Deletion and allow me to work there; and will be happy if you allow independent adminstrator to make their judgement.121.46.87.82 (talk)13:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was completely different from the decade old 2016 version. So A4 no longer applies there.121.46.87.82 (talk)14:08, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In a way you're correct in saying that it was significantly different from the deleted version. In fact, it was shorter than the original version, with fewer references, so it's very unlikely to meet the inclusion criteria. However, I could restore it to draft. You don't seem to have edited previously, so you should practise before you start trying to create articles.Deb (talk)14:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure;121.46.87.82 (talk)14:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In this way I will also get enough time to improve it in draft space.121.46.87.82 (talk)14:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb Hey, it seems you forgot to restore the requested draft?121.46.87.82 (talk)12:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you done any practice yet?Deb (talk)12:46, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What? I don't need any practice to make edits in the draft space. You are unnecessarily extending the process?121.46.87.82 (talk)12:47, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What's the great rush? Do you have a conflict of interest?Deb (talk)12:52, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No great rush? My request is idle for the past 25 hours?121.46.87.82 (talk)12:52, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You may be under the impression that I have nothing else to do but respond to your requests. I consider this to be low priority, and you could be doing something useful while you are waiting.Deb (talk)12:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb; I have tried to improve the draft following your advice above; I think that things have changed in the decade and Subject do passWP:Basic at the moment. Requesting you to send this back to main space perWP:DRAFTOBJECT. Thanks.121.46.87.246 (talk)07:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will be happy if you will allow independent new page patroller or admin to patrol this in main space. Regards121.46.87.246 (talk)08:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not in mainspace, in draft. Follow the instructions to submit it for review.Deb (talk)08:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb You Can't force me to bound with AFC; as it is not a compulsory process; if you think it still needs significant improvements then please let me know so that I can improve a bit more before it is moved to main space. Just wanted to say you that I am skipping AFC here. Thanks121.46.87.246 (talk)08:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're a brand-new user and you should go through the normal process. You've flatly refused to practise editing, which leads me to the conclusion that you do have a connection with the subject that you haven't declared; nevertheless I've given you a second chance, so use it wisely.Deb (talk)08:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SeeWP:BUREAUCRACY . I have no connection with the subject hence declaringno conflict of interest. Although you can assume anything you like but you can't impose your wishes on others. See What Wikipedia is not.121.46.87.246 (talk)08:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please follow the correct procedure as instructed.Deb (talk)08:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not bound to AFC. Either send this to main space or recommend changes to improve the draft.121.46.87.246 (talk)08:46, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deb&oldid=1318671646"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp