Coming here to ask why I deleted your article? Readthis page first...
If that doesn't help, read these FAQs.
1. Why did you delete my page when I hadn't finished writing it?
Answer: Don't create new articles unless you are sure they meet wikipedia's criteria, particularlynotability andverifiability. If you want to practice, there is thesandbox facility andWikipedia:Articles for creation where you can get a second opinion from a more experienced contributor. And if you really can't help yourself, use {{underconstruction}} so other people will know you are still working on it.
2. Why did you delete my page for advertising? I wasn't trying to advertise!
Answer: ReadWikipedia:NPOV for guidance on how to word an article so that it doesn't sound like an advertisement.
3. Why did you delete my page for advertising? It was about a non-profit organisation!
Answer: Non-profit organisations advertise all the time - it's still promotion and the rule applies to them just as it does to commercial bodies. See no 2 above.
4. Why did you delete my article without warning?
Answer: Because you are not entitled to a warning if you don't follow the guidelines. See no 1 above.
5. Why didn't you do a google search and find references for my article and put them in for me instead of just deleting it?
Answer: Because I don't have time to do the boring bits for you. I have enough boring bits of my own to work on, thank you.
6. You have a very interesting view of neutrality. The authors you give credence to have a definite point of view and you discount those that disagree.
Answer: There is of course no answer because this is not a question. It's a snide comment added by someone who doesn't understand the NPOV rule. Possibly a Ricardian revisionist.
And pleaseSIGN YOUR POSTS, otherwise I don't know who is asking me the question!
Aftera motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections atWP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g.[[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.
Hi Deb. I just noticed evidence of block evasion with an account you blocked,Tzmediahouse. They createdDraft:Ebonny Musik, which you deleted as G11 and blocked them. The next day, another account popped up -TzolaTz - and recreated the same draft. Hardly coincidence, I think. --Drm310🍁 (talk)22:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deb I want to challenge your speedy deletion here,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghulam_Rasool_Dehlvi as I beleive that subject atleast passes;WP: Basic ; and A4 does not applicable here as it was significantly different from the deleted version, as far as I can see from Wikipedia mirror website. Please undelete it per contested Deletion and allow me to work there; and will be happy if you allow independent adminstrator to make their judgement.121.46.87.82 (talk)13:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In a way you're correct in saying that it was significantly different from the deleted version. In fact, it was shorter than the original version, with fewer references, so it's very unlikely to meet the inclusion criteria. However, I could restore it to draft. You don't seem to have edited previously, so you should practise before you start trying to create articles.Deb (talk)14:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You may be under the impression that I have nothing else to do but respond to your requests. I consider this to be low priority, and you could be doing something useful while you are waiting.Deb (talk)12:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Deb You Can't force me to bound with AFC; as it is not a compulsory process; if you think it still needs significant improvements then please let me know so that I can improve a bit more before it is moved to main space. Just wanted to say you that I am skipping AFC here. Thanks121.46.87.246 (talk)08:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're a brand-new user and you should go through the normal process. You've flatly refused to practise editing, which leads me to the conclusion that you do have a connection with the subject that you haven't declared; nevertheless I've given you a second chance, so use it wisely.Deb (talk)08:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]