This user may have left Wikipedia. Danmuz has not edited Wikipediasince July 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Danmuz, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using theArticle Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk |contribs)09:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Danmuz,Thanks for assessing the Dizzy and Mads Langer articles from WikiProject Denmark! I appreciate it :-)--Eddyspeeder (talk)11:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome :)Danmuz (talk)11:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What did you have in mind? Are there any pages in particular you'd like to see fleshed out?Cheers!W0lfie (talk)18:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good question! I will post my thoughts on what I think should be done on theproject discussion page right away. Cheers,Danmuz (talk)10:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me to help revive the project. Real life really gets in the way of this sort of thing! But I would love to help out as I have time. For several years I've dreamed of bumpingPipe organ to FA status; perhaps a goal that is too far-fetched for the time being. We might have more luck with other articles:Organ pipe might not be too difficult, for example. —Cor anglais 1601:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thanks for helping! It would be great to get Pipe Organ to FA, but I'm not sure what it would take to get there? What need to be improved? Good idea about Organ Pipe, a good place to start with that article is adding references to the article. I think that alone could make it a B-class article.Danmuz (talk)09:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding aboutWikiProject Pipe Organ! I try to do here something, when I have a time.--Jyriorgan1 (talk)04:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you also for reminding me. As with the previous user I can try to do something when I have time, but it will have to be something small and specific. Best wishes for reviving this project!RGB2 (talk)07:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding, Jyriorgan1 and RGB2! We can of course all only do so much as we have time to, but everything helps, and I think it is worthwhile to keep the project alive. Kind regards,Danmuz (talk)14:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danmuz,

I would like to help revive this project.

a) I made a recommendation to include a list of notable organists.

b) We should merge "Pipe organ" with "Organ pipe"

c) the world's largest pipe organs should be a list on the main page "Pipe organ"

d) Need lots more links to video and music and photos

bewporteous— Precedingunsigned comment added byBewporteous (talk •contribs)21:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bewporteous,

Thanks for contributing to the project with ideas! Starting backwards I agree it's a good idea with more multimedia content.

• I'm not sure whether a list of the largest organs should go into the pipe organ article itself, but a link to thecurrent list should definitely be easier to find in the article - and speaking of that list, it could use improvement!
• Merging Pipe Organ with Organ Pipe would probably make the Pipe Organ article too extensive, I think
• How would your list of notable organists differ from the currentList of organists?

Kind regards,Danmuz (talk)16:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw no concerns in your rollback request so I've gone ahead and gave you the rollback right. Please keep in mind our policies about its use, specifically never use it in a content dispute, stick to using it for vandalism :) And when in doubt, assume good faith, always :) Feel free to direct any questions you might have to me or any other admin. Cheers,Snowolf^{How can I help?}07:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will do my best to use the tool wisely and live up the trust! Cheers,Danmuz (talk)07:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danmuz, as you might have guessed, I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so would like to understand more about why you're assisting Saddhiyama in promulgating misinformation about the true origins of what we now know as Lego blocks. I only have an interest in the correct information, and my goal isn't to vandalise anything or cause anyone disrespect. However, the version that Saddhiyama keeps on reverting to has the "development" of Lego blocks in Denmark, when it is clearly in England (origin). I would very much appreciate your suggestion as to how we can have this error corrected other than me being continually accused of vandalism (which, again, is not m intent). thanks, Robin.— Precedingunsigned comment added by60.234.212.234 (talk)09:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robin, I will answer you here. First of all, thanks for the civil and constructive message. My goal was (and is) not to assist Saddhiyama or any particular editor, but an edit-war has erupted over the edits you are proposing at the articleLego. Since the edits you wish to make are a serious change to the (until now) established consensus regarding the article, hence it is your edits that has been reverted. The way to go from here is to take the discussion on the Lego Talk page, where you can state your case backed up by reliable sources (Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a source), and if your sources are good enough possibly a new consensus will be established. That is the way it works on Wikipedia. It may seem cumbersome but it is necessary for Wikipedia to function. Kind regards,Danmuz (talk)11:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(PS: I see now that you have already started a discussion on the Talk Page today, which is the right course of action. Regards,Danmuz (talk)11:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks. There's a lot of vandalism on wikipedia relating to the trivia contest in Stevens Point, Wisconsin.Jwend392 (talk)08:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the coffee! --Danmuz (talk)08:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I talked toUser:Milonica and told him/her that the issue has been resolved, they went to tell me that it was okay to blank my page.— Precedingunsigned comment added by99.132.67.105 (talk)13:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danmuz are you aware of this?:http://www.doctorsmedicalopinion.com/wiki/User_talk:Danmuz ←Pohutukawa (talk)21:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pohutukawa, I hadn't seen that particular site before, but there are many similar sites that scrapes content from Wikipedia in order to "trick" people into visiting the site when using search engines. I find it annoying, but apparently they are not doing anything illegal since Wikipedia content is released under a creative commons licence. --Danmuz (talk)08:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On22 September 2012,Did you know? was updated with a fact from the articleFrederik Magle, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was... thatFrederik Magle required the use of thethigh bone from agiraffe as an instrument in hissymphonic suiteCantabile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Frederik Magle. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,quick check) and it will be added toDYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on theDid you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

	Danish music
	Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Danish composers such asFrederik Magle, for good gnome work and for your effort to revive projectPipeOrgan, - you are anawesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk)04:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very, very much, Gerda! I appreciate a lot - not least coming from a truly awesome Wikipedian like you! --Danmuz (talk)14:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 251st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk)16:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organ Club.  —Waldhorn (talk)05:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--GilderienChat|List of good deeds20:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We needyou!

HiDanmuz! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at theWorld Digital Library, a project of theLibrary of Congress andUNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participatehere. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you!EdwardsBot (talk)19:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danmuz, I see you're one of the more-active participants in WikiProject Pipe Organ -- much appreciated! I recently taggedSt. Wilfrid Club for inclusion in the project, since it's a notable club of organists in the Greater New York area -- and (as a non-member) I've done a bit of work on the article. I doubt it'll ever rise above "Low" importance (primarily for specialists), and I'm sure there are still some Wikipedia "style" issues -- but I think by now the content might be sufficient to raise the article from Stub to "B" quality rating. Is there a standard procedure for assessment? Please feel free to take a look (at your convenience), and see what you think. Thank you kindly for your consideration.Patrug (talk)11:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrug! Great work you have done on that article. Yes, you are right, it will likely not rise above "low" on the project importance scale, but that of course does not mean the topic is not worthwhile, just that it is, as you say, primarily of interest for specialists. Regarding the Quality scale you can see a general description of the levels here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedia/Assessment#Quality_scale. After your expansion and other improvements the article is certainly no longer a "stub", and in fact it is very close to "C" class, but mainly because it currently relies on a single source I have assessed it as "start" class. It still have some way to go before reaching B, but "C" should be within reach with just a few improvements (especially more references). Regards, --Danmuz (talk)20:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danmuz, thanks very much. While the article is fully referenced for its notable past members, unfortunately there's just one known reference describing the St. Wilfrid Club itself (since it's a private organization). Sorry if this keeps the article in "Start" class and leaves "C" class out of reach. -Patrug (talk)21:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Patrug. I'm sorry I could not assess it higher at this point, but don't lose hope. Itis a problem that their is only a single source. The sources about the individual members are unfortunately irrelevant in regard to the St Wilfrid Club itself, unless it is specifically mentioned. Speaking of the individual members, the list should probably also conform with the norm for embedded lists in order for the article to reach a C class assessment. See:WP:EMBED. internal links (even if the article is not yet written) would also be preferred instead of the external links. Back to the issue of the single source; are you sure that no additional sources can be found? The club has been in existence since 1908, and even if it is a private clubsomething must have been written. --Danmuz (talk)12:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Danmuz -- now the links for club members are better. After months of searching online & offline, neither I nor the club officers have been able to find another published reference source describing the club. If we eventually do, it looks like the article already satisfies the other guidelines for "B" quality (criteria 2 through 6). If we can't expand beyond the single source, it looks like we'll have permanent "Start" quality. -Patrug (talk)08:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Danmuz. Over the past year or two, I've gradually added more info & refs for theSt. Wilfrid Club article. The club was actually the subject of a meeting announcement in The New York Times (ref #14), and the club was specifically mentioned in the NYT obits of several notable members (ref #4,6,11,15,17,20,31). Together with the main journal citation (ref #1), are these enough to overcome the "single source" objection from Dec 2013 (above)? If so, I think the article now meetsthe six criteria for "B" class. Many thanks if you agree. —Patrug (talk)11:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goddag Danmuz! Så er der anført en IPA-udtale påFrederik Magle som ønsketHøst (talk)17:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Tak for det, Høst! Det er en stor hjælp. --Danmuz (talk)08:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleFrederik Magle you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofAdam Cuerden --Adam Cuerden (talk)02:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun a GA review. I found a few issues, but they're of the "this is going to pass, just not immediately" sort; I'd be shocked if this doesn't get to GA.Adam Cuerden^(talk)02:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And it's passed now. As I thought. Great work, and good luck pushing it to featured article!Adam Cuerden^(talk)00:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Adam! For reviewing and passing it, and for the encouragement to take it to FA! I will certainly look into that in the future. --Danmuz (talk)14:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The articleFrederik Magle you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Frederik Magle for comments about the article. Well done!Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofAdam Cuerden --Adam Cuerden (talk)00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion, you might be interested in,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts Thanks.prokaryotes (talk)18:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danish music
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Danish composers such asFrederik Magle, for good gnome work and for your effort to revive projectPipeOrgan, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)04:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 251st recipient of myPumpkinSky Prize, repeated inbr'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk)06:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years ago, you were recipient no.251 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk)16:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onIvar Frounberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.Aust331 (talk)09:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country likeWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}03:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danmuz. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is aone-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there aremore than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded{{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards,Stevietheman —Delivered:01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danmuz. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danmuz. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danmuz. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago,you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk)05:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectPiano Music has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 29 § Piano Music until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer407:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages