An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in{{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions atWP:STICKYDECO.
An RfC has resulted ina broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
AnArticles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in theGadgets settings.Sign up here to participate!
Hi, sorry, I have nothing to add, I thought it was understood, the translations from Google translator are correct. If you want more information ask thequestura di Milano, I can not disclose more. Hi,LukeWiller (talk)22:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative toRFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
Hi, I would like to apply for an Open Proxy Exemption. The reason I am applying is due to the recent wave of censorship here in the UK which might result in Wikipedia getting blocked here. Should that happen I would need to use a VPN to access the site therefore I would need one to edit. If you look at my history you can see my consistent history of good edits, particularly my work adding results for various London elections.
Followinga request for comment, there isa new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses oftemporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors canrequest access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.
South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated acontentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined asAll pages related to the region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
Wikimania 2025 is happening inNairobi,Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years ofWikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You canregister here now.
It is indeed! I can't take credit for the quote itself, it's stolen shamelessly from a journalist here in Australia (which was then repurposed in a quite famous civil judgement a year or so ago). But geez, it speaks to a lot of misjudged choices that I see around these parts at times. It also somewhat aligns withUser:Barkeep49/Friends don't let friends get sanctioned too (an excellent essay).Daniel (talk)00:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC is open on whether use ofemojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion underG15.
An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Can I just close the thread at Arb Clarifications myself? I think it's a waste of time to go through the whole process if we can just speedy close it and make a new request at the correct place. —Matrixping mewhen u reply (t? -c)21:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Daniel. I just noticed you suppressed some revisions atSawbrimedline. I didn't realize this when I re-added content about what the user's had posted on their user page back toWP:AN#Unblock request by Sawbrimedline. The user who modified AN post just left an edit summary saying "trim", which didn't make mention of the suppression. Anyway, my apologies if my re-adding of the post created another diff that needs to be hidden. --Marchjuly (talk)01:52, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Marchjuly thanks for the note, will hide the revisions at AN also. While it wasn't my edit summary, I can speak for maybe why the editor used it - a lot of the time, generic or otherwise mundane edit summaries are used for this thing to avoid drawing attention to it. I used "rv" on the user page for that reason, and often we'll use simple things like "-" etc. Cheers,Daniel (talk)02:43, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying. The user who modified my post subsequently explained on my user talk page why they left such an edit summary; so, things have all been sorted out. As for the ANI thread, I notified Oversight myself via email and someone suppressed the diffs; if that was you, then thanks. --Marchjuly (talk)05:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aftera motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections atWP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g.[[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.
@Daniel: Hello, I request that the above user be blocked from sending emails. The user is sending multiple emails to other users and requesting edits, which constitutes an attempt to evade their block.🅣𝓗𝓪𝓻𝓸𝓵𝓭 𝓚𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓼18:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Harold Krabs: Was the email sent via the Emailuser function (Wikipedia:Emailing users), or directly to your email address? It will have"This email was sent by user "GennVekk" (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GennVekk>) on the English Wikipedia to user "Harold Krabs". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents." at the bottom of it, if it was sent via EmailUser. Thanks,Daniel (talk)19:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Harold Krabs: thanks very much, confirming I got it. You'll notice at the bottom of the email, it saysThis email was sent by GennVekk to Harold Krabs by the "Email this user" function at Wikimedia Commons. Unfortunately I can't block them at Wikimedia Commons, as it's a totally separate project (seec:Commons:Welcome). My block only applies to the English Wikipedia, where I'm an admin here. The Commons administrator team may be able to assist, they can be found atc:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Cheers,Daniel (talk)00:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]