Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Dan100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Talk archive

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNike Oregon Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMatthew Centrowitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undue haste! Tsk

[edit]

Hi Dan100, how dare you makethis rapid-response edit when it's only been queried formore than six years?! Honestly, with a bit of love and care we might have nursed it to a decade or more and then we could have baked it a cake and had a nice tea party! Tsk, you young people and your haste! :) Best wishesDBaK (talk)07:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedE-UTRA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBandwidth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCatalina Sky Survey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMount Bigelow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGriddle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGrill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedJulius Caesar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesBritain andSiege of Mytilene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCouncil house, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLounge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onWright R-3350 Duplex-Cyclone. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Andy Dingley (talk)10:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRhyl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWelsh Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDe Havilland Comet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCone of Silence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dan100. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dan100. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCombined cycle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCarnot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Usebox 4 U!

[edit]

I noticed you are in the village stocks, so here's a userbox for you!

CodeResult
{{User:CrazyMinecart88/BOOM}}
This user hastotally not destroyed Wikipedia.
Usage


Thanks,CrazyMinecart8823:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Air Flight 386 listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectLion Air Flight 386. Since you had some involvement with theLion Air Flight 386 redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Jc86035 (talk)16:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPendleton Woolen Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJacquard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De are the worldKamel Lounis (talk)06:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slowly : this world is we . . .Kamel Lounis (talk)06:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated links

[edit]

Just to let you know, Dan100,Viacom is now adisambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did atMy5, please use:

[[ViacomCBS|Viacom]] or just[[ViacomCBS]]

See more about linking at thehelp page and theproject page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this!PI Ellsworth  ed. put'r there15:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing refs with dead links

[edit]

Regardingthis edit, we don't remove refs that have dead links. Please readWP:LINKROT for an explanation why that is. In this case it was easy torepair the ref witharchive.org. -Ahunt (talk)13:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDoubling time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAssyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRS-88, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLockheed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAlstom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAlcatel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)11:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using anedit summary. Please do your best toalways fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!Erictalk15:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion ofOxford University Gliding Club

[edit]
Notice

The articleOxford University Gliding Club has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet our notability requirements, as supported by RSs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --2603:7000:2143:8500:1544:2C08:6338:A34A (talk)18:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert

[edit]

Hi Dan, I was just curious as to why you removed a sentencehere. I know it was unsourced, and I would add a reference if I am able to find one. However, it's also a somewhat minor point and not really needed. I addition, it's anachronistic, as LM didn't exist in 1982, and I would have found the correct company before restoring it. Thanks.BilCat (talk)02:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
TheWikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project •Project discussion •Members •Assessment •Outreach •The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the nameThe WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and itssub-projects. If you wish to continue receivingThe WikiEagle, you can add your username to themailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, pleaselet us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December,an RfC was closed which determinedtheaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which iscited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to thelist of problematic sources afterthis discussion.
  • TheJim Lovell article waspromoted toFeatured Article status on 26 December after being nominated byHawkeye7.
  • TheRaymond Hesselyn article waspromoted toGood Article status on 4 December after being nominated byZawed.
  • TheSupermarine Sea King article waspromoted toGood Article status on 22 December after being nominated byAmitchell125.
  • TheWilliam Hodgson (RAF officer) article waspromoted toGood Article status on 26 December after being nominated byZawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386.Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA142
FL15
A56
GA505
B4,573
C11,878
Start15,082
Stub18,754
List2,539
Category11,638
Disambig653
File2,713
Portal629
Project89
Redirect1,518
Template2,489
NA66
Assessed73,339
Unassessed1
Total73,340
WikiWork factors (?)ω =253,771Ω = 4.89
New/Ongoing Discussions

Featured Article review

A-class Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Merger proposals

Splitting proposals


Deletion

Requested moves

Did you know


On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes toThe WikiEagle atThe WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from themailing list.
Newsletter contributor:ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ConcerningRichard Desmond

[edit]

Good morning to you :). I actually laughed a bit about your edit. Just as a heads-up: we have a page forpornographer. Cheers and happy editing.Lectonar (talk)08:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that youoften edit without using anedit summary. Please do your best toalways fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box inyour preferences. Thanks!Danners430 (talk)08:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dan100, I notice that almost all of your edits still either lack an edit summary, or they are completely unhelpful (“m”, “Edits” etc.) Edit summaries exist to allow other Wikipedians to quickly and easily identify what was changed on an article - please try to use meaningful edit summaries wherever possible.Danners430 (talk)09:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto.Erictalk13:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dan does use edit summaries when necessary, such ashere (Deconfuse), which is obvious when you look at the diff. "Edit" obviously means "copyedit", and "m" minor. Editing on a mobile device may account for the terseness. Do y'all have any examples of major unexplained edits that aren't obvious?BilCat (talk)15:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One of the reasons for using a summary is to help other editors decide whether to take the time to look at a diff. Not everyone can take the time to look at every single diff of every edit that pops up on his or her watchlist. It's one thing if the watcher knows the editor's history, reputation, inclinations, etc, but that is of course not always the case. 17:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
A major edit would likely be one that involves a change in the hundreds or thousands of bytes. If it is just zero, or several bytes, it's likely minor. Taken with "Edit" or "m", one can assume it's a minor edit. I'm not trying to defend Dan, as he is capable of doing that well enough himself. I'm simply pointing out it's not all that difficult to realize what's a genuinely minor edit from one's watchlist or a recent changes list. If Dan is making major edits without any edit summary, that would be another matter. Is he?BilCat (talk)19:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I got distracted from the thread I started! I agree that this is not an issue with missing edit summaries - but instead summaries which simply consist of "Edit" or "m"... the entire point of an edit summary is to summarise the edits that you've made to assist other editors. There is no way at all to discern what has been changed if the edit summary is nothing more than "Edit".Danners430 (talk)23:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BilCat@Danners430@Eric no change yet.Doug Wellertalk19:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, as long as the edits in question are genuinely minor copyedits, I don't see a problem. Take it to one of the noticeboards if you're really concerned about it, but I think you'd be wasting your time.BilCat (talk)21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's an example:[1] Removal of a "More citations needed" maintenance template with no edit summary. It's a short article with only two sections, one of which has no sources and the other is well sourced. So I'm left guessing, but I imagine he thinks we don't need to tag the article when only one section is a problem. But then why didn't he just tag the section? I have no idea.GA-RT-22 (talk)00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m beginning to wonder if @Dan100 even looks at their talk page… because there have been no responses whatsoever from them. Certainly that falls underpoor communication.Danners430 (talk)12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has bothered me today.84.250.15.152 (talk)21:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently been editingclimate change which has been designated acontentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Wellertalk19:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Centrifugal Compressor edit apr2023

[edit]

hello Dan,The material you removed was not from a textbook and contributes to the article. Other revisions have distorted the flow of explanation. It is a remnant from linking pictures to paragraphs. I would like to reinstall this material with the few corrections needed. Is this okay with you.Mkoronowski (talk)16:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

This one is enjoying the fall and says, thanks for persistently keeping things tidy around here.

– SJ +23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hiu

[edit]

Would you mind changing the name of this to something more... obvious? Thanks!Primefac (talk)17:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!

[edit]
Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, ~Liancetalk21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came across your helpful edit onNode.js and noticed that today marks 20 years since you created your Wikipedia account! Always makes me happy to see someone continuing to contribute over such a long period of time. Thank you for your efforts over the years and I hope you have a great day! ~Liancetalk21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have anedit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should beexplained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on thetalk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may bequite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to yourWikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by settingPreferences →Editing →TickPrompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.Thanks!GGOTCC16:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

iPhone (1st generation)

[edit]

Hi there! Could you please clarify your changesto this page? I see that you made a set of minor changes, and at least one of them is actually incorrect. You changed this "Six weeks prior to the iPhone's release, the plastic screen was replaced with glass" to "Sixmonths prior to the iPhone's release, the plastic screen was replaced with glass", howeverthe sources clearly speak about 1 month/6 weeks. Is there any specific reason why you changed that? --Dylan--86 (talk)10:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan100&oldid=1315382440"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp