Re:this edit - the introduction to the waterboard article is the product of long discussion and consensus on the talk page. Please get consensus on the talk page before changing text that has been discussed so extensively. I've reverted your edit.Raul654 (talk)03:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction to the waterboarding page was in direct violation with Wikipedia's policy against including points of view in the articles. If you wish to express your point of view please do so on the discussion page. As for the article, I'll continue to scrub it to comform with Wikipedia's standards.DaleEastman (talk)21:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]