User talk:Dalderdj
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Welcome!
Hello, Dalderdj, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!Aboutmovies (talk)10:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The articleIsidor Sârbu (disambiguation) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed01:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Nice to meet you. I'm just confirming that the stamp picture you put on the Bessarabian politician articles you created contain the person in question? I so, I'd like to relocate the picture to the infobox (you can also do this yourself) as I think it makes more sense for it to go there, unless you disagree. Regards,Airplanemantalk01:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, andwelcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to theAnton Crihan article, but for legal reasons, we cannot acceptcopyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must includeon the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of theGNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms ofthe Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."
You might want to look atWikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page.152.16.59.102 (talk)07:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to giveVyacheslav Jordan a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.
In this specific case, because the move is contentious, you will need to follow the instructions at the requested moves page for opening discussion on the proposed move. —C.Fred (talk)01:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onDumitru Remenco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see theArticle Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.Riotrocket8676You gotta problem with that?01:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onViaţa Basarabiei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see theArticle Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.Riotrocket8676You gotta problem with that?01:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 | OnMay 3, 2010,Did you know? was updated with a fact from the articleViaţa Basarabiei, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,quick check ) and add it toDYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on theDid you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk)16:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to giveMoldova–Romania border crossings a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, intoMoldova–Romania border. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.R'n'B (call me Russ)15:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onPavel Parasca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see theArticle Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding[reply]{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK)19:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
I self-reverted this nomination. You don't need to be concerned about it. —TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK)19:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You recently added a large number of articles on people who do not appear to be notable. (The example above regardingPavel Parasca is one.) Could you provide support fromWP:BIO about why you feel this group of people is notable? Thanks,Piano non troppo (talk)21:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest. They are public people, are regarded as important figures, are officeholders, academics, and authors, received a notable award or honor. (Dalderdj (talk)21:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]
This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofSoroca Fort, and it appears to include a substantial copy ofhttp://en.tixik.com/rovets-1285489.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot (talk)21:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dalderdj. Thank you for creatiing the article aboutIon Ţurcanu. In order to prevent possible deletion o f this article, please provide relable references in English language. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk)14:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleVladimir Beşleagă has beenproposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onesource that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask atWikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Mr. R00tTalk17:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dalderdj. Thank you for creating the article aboutVasile Odobescu. In order to prevent possible deletion of this article, please provide relable references in English language. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk)01:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In primul rand vreau sa va zic ca nu este obligatoriu ca referintele sa fie in limba engleza, doar sa provina din surse de incredere (WP:RS).
Acum: va rog frumos, ş si ţ, nu ș si ț! Da, stiu, a doua varianta e corecta, dar aici pe en.wp o folosim pe prima, si pana cand o-sa se hotarasca sa se schimbe de tot (ceea ce implica zeci de mii de modificari), vom ramane cu ş si ţ. Multumesc pentru intelegere si spor la treaba. -BiruitorulTalk16:33, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onŞtefan Pirogan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see theArticle Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.mark nutley (talk)22:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there. When adding categories, make sure they don't overlap. When they do, it's probably better to leave just a subcat. --Illythr (talk)16:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onTatarka common graves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to amainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request thatadministrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template{{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article'stalk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.DASHBot (talk)18:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onCapitala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company,etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see theArticle Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contactone of these admins to request that theyuserfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.Kedster (talk /contribs)05:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAndrei Strâmbeanu has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Suri 100 (talk)03:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAdrian Bălănescu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Bălănescu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Crisco 1492 (talk)14:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAdrian Bălănescu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Bălănescu(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Crisco 1492 (talk)08:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Dalderdj, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on,IDIS Viitorul, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion.If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}It helps to explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on theHelp Desk. Thanks again for contributing!Oo7565 (talk)01:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 |
--Codrin.B (talk)16:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The articleValeriu Matei has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Luis150902 (talk |contribs)20:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Elections in Moldova since 1917 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Frietjes (talk)16:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, April 2009 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)16:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, July 2009 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)16:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, and thank you forcontributing the pageNicolae Osmochescu to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to theEnglish version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed atPages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.Rathfelder (talk)15:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Union of Journalists of Moldova members has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Rathfelder (talk)20:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veaceslav Stăvilă until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bearcat (talk)21:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The articleConsulate-General of Moldova, Iași has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Embassies are not inherently notable, consulates even less so. FailsWP:ORG for lack of coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The articleEmbassy of Moldova, Athens has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article just has 2 primary sources to confirm it exists. FailsWP:ORG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleLimes (Romanian magazine) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No assertion of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]