Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atList of Australian supercentenarians. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeatedvandalism can result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}04:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary to articles as you did toList of Australian supercentenarians. Please usetalk:List of Australian supercentenarians to discuss improvements to the article. Thank youJim1138 (talk)03:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!Crveni5,you are invited toThe Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, pleasejoin us!I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,HostBot (talk)17:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to theList of supercentenarians from Asia article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanyingtalk page. If you post your comments there, othereditors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you!Dcirovic (talk)06:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can I find a talk page to an article which has been deleted? "Crveni5 (talk) 01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Crveni5Crveni5 (talk)01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)"[reply]

I said no such thing. Above, I said "Please do not add commentary..." You had added thisthisWho deleted this list? Please reinstate it. last September. Please don't do that. Also, please sign your talk with four tildes "~~~~"Jim1138 (talk)11:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

People remove information from Wikipedia articles without permission. All I seek is that article is returned to it's correct state. "Crveni5 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Crveni5Crveni5 (talk)01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)"[reply]

Mate you have 103 career edits pipe down, ok i made a few mistakes lol no need to get ur knickers in a knot princess xoJackETC (talk)02:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have to assume the lyrics of the club song are under copyright, as it's unknown what year the second verse was added. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)22:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I've had to reversethis edit as you didn't provide a source that tells her name. Please note that all sources used for her in this article refer to her as "Anonymous" and don't provide a name.CommanderLinx (talk)15:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHoppers Crossing, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThe Grange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history atList of Australian supercentenarians shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}18:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a good idea to edit war in this topic area. As stated in edit summaries, you need to provide a source that states a person has reached their 110th birthday before they can be added to an article. A two year old source from when they were 108 is not good enough. I strongly advise you to either provide a source or leave the page alone. If you don't you will find yourself blocked or topic banned.CommanderLinx (talk)10:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

TheArbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctions to be used for pages regardingLongevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}18:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you disrupt any longevity article once more, you can expect to be subject to the enforcement of discretionary sanctions.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}08:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit you made toList of Northern Irish supercentenarians, did not appear constructive and has beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please usethe sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.North America¹⁰⁰⁰08:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atList of Northern Irish supercentenarians. Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have beenreverted.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges. Thank you.North America¹⁰⁰⁰08:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Once an article has been de-prodded, it is not to be re-prodded, as perWP:PROD. Since you want the article deleted, I recommend starting an AfD discussion.North America¹⁰⁰⁰08:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not simple for people to understand? Either we have one article for United Kingdom, or there are separate articles for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. What is people's problem???Crveni5 (talk)11:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Crveni5[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Crveni5 reported by User:Northamerica1000 (Result: ). Thank you.North America¹⁰⁰⁰08:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to let you know that the user has withdrawn their report against you. However, it is advised that you don't reinstate Prod templates or put up Speedy Deletion templates when the deletion request is declined/objected to. If you still feel like the article should be deleted, it's best to proceed to discussing the article for deletion. ReviewWP:DP for more details.GUtt01 (talk)10:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedPostojna Cave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTroglodytic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crveni5. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been updating the Longevity pages for about 9 years. When you attempt to update the pages incompletely and inaccurately. This is of no help. It is more difficult to clean up your mess than to update the tables correctly. Please take note and react accordingly.TFBCT1 (talk)00:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TFBCT1: Wikipedia is free for anybody to provide contributions. Just because some people may have been editing articles longer than others does not mean they have additional privileges. Updates are done in good faith and as accurately as possible.Crveni5 (talk)02:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The longevity pages are a specialized group with specialized conditions. I have been doing the daily updates for ten years on all pages. I have also been cleaning up your "good faith" attempts for over 6 months. As I said previously, although your "good faith" attempts are appreciated, they are not helpful. They are always incomplete and more often then not "in error." And they certainly aren't needed. All updates are already done completely, correctly, and in a timely fashion. It is more timely to re-do your mistakes. Understood?TFBCT1 (talk)16:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TFBCT1: Life is too short to waste arguing with people like you.

I am taking action against you for using multiple accounts (sock puppets) on pageList of Japanese supercentenarians. To the result of reverting (3) of my viable edits, listing them as vandalism and in error and ultmately leaving the page itself in error. This will not be tolerated. I will be doing the PSI to have your account banned permanently.TFBCT1 (talk)12:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TFBCT1: A ridiculous and unsubstantiated claim.Crveni5 (talk)06:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{Ivm|2=This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

TheArbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctions to be used for pages regardingLongevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system.TFBCT1 (talk)12:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crveni5. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crveni5. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDandenong City SC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJames Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFile:Paris_Jackson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk (We are the champions, my friends)11:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atList of the verified oldest people, you may beblocked from editing.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}04:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are NOT disruptive nor can they be classified as vandalism. Wikipedia is open to all who wish to contribute and it is not your personal fiefdom! Personal attacks are not tolerated by Wikipedia and your constant harassment will be acted upon if it continues.Crveni5 (talk)23:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are deliberately going against the long-standing consensus of longevity articles on Wikipedia, AFAIK all such lists; ties always go in chronological order.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}11:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So please provide an example of where I have 'vandalised' a list on Wikipedia.Crveni5 (talk)07:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest edit! Despite the above warnings you've done the same thing yet again. Do you actually have any idea what you are doing???DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}08:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again you make accusations with no evidence to support your claims. I updated a number of pages this evening. All of them were left in chronological order.Crveni5 (talk)08:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well either you do not understand the concept of chronological order, or we are seeing different versions of the table (this is possible as the cache does not always clear when the viewing an updated page). So, as I see it, after my revert the order is in the men:

Whereas your edit looks like this:

So on my list because Tokuda and Barrso are both 111 years and 2 days but CHRONOLOGICALLY Tokuda was the earliest he appears ABOVE Barroso. Same for Pierro and Theobald, same age but as Pierro reached that age first he is above Theobald.

Either you are not seeing the same thing I am or you do not understand that chronological order means the person that reached the age first goes above the person that reached that age later.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}09:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.DerbyCountyinNZ^{(TalkContribs)}23:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance withHelp:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, thereversion of clear-cutvandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.CaptainEek^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓02:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youCaptainEek. I have been the victim of bullying for the last five years by another Wikipedia user. Most of my edits have been keeping the articles regarding longevity up to date. Plus I edit some soccer related articles. Many people access and edit these articles. But only one person constantly harasses me claiming I am vandalizing articles. If that was true then other Wikipedia users would also identify this issue. But it is onlyDerbyCountyinNZ. Wikipedia has a clear policy regarding bullying of other users and I strongly suggest that they read and understand what they are doing is bullying in is a breach of this policy.Crveni5 (talk)13:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crveni5, I think you have missed the point here. I didn't even mention Derby. I asked you to not mark your edits as minor when they aren't, which you seem to have completely ignored.CaptainEek^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓19:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest inlongevity. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

creffett (talk)18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder for both parties in thecurrent AN/I thread - I see that your last notification was in 2017.creffett (talk)18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does not surprise mecreffett that there have been previous notifications asDerbyCountyinNZ has been bullying me since 2015. Look ay my user talk page.Crveni5 (talk)13:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Altona City SC.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Ixfd64 (talk)22:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Banyule City SC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»15:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Northbridge FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»10:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made toHeiko Maas, did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use yoursandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Rankersbo (talk)09:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abbeyard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives -talk -edits04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:CSA Australia Savez.jpg.

This image is aderivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overallcopyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have createdin your upload log.Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under anon-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) thenthe image will be deleted48 hours after 05:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»05:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Essendon Royals Crest.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing theimage description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to theimage use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here isa list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»13:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Hills United FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing theimage description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to theimage use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here isa list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»13:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Langwarrin SC.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under theCC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (seethis list)at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication topermissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere. If you take this step, add{{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here isa list of your uploads.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»11:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:FC Clifton Hill Crest.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under theCC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (seethis list)at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication topermissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere. If you take this step, add{{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here isa list of your uploads.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»15:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Glenorchy Croatia Crest.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under theCC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (seethis list)at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication topermissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere. If you take this step, add{{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here isa list of your uploads.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»12:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account may have been hijacked by someone to possibly vandalize the "List of Canadian supercentenarians" last evening. It appears that an edit regarding the death of Madeleine Stanley was undone by you account . No reason was given despite the requirement to do so when undoing an edit. I fixed the problem but you should change your password to prevent someone from doing this again. Thank you and good luck.Rklingmann (talk)00:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YouRklingmann are an idiot. My account was NOT hacked. Where is your proof? Those edits were done by me. You made a mistake in one of your edits which I corrected but that clearly triggered you. Your comments "possible vandalism" are just a poor attempt to justify your actions of reversing my edits. Why is it Wikipedia attracts cellar dwellers like you? In future provide evidence before jumping to incorrect conclusions. Fool.Crveni5 (talk)07:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I told my edit was reverted by you? My edit was correct WHEN IT WAS MADE. The living supercentenarian keeps moving up.WordwizardW (talk)WordwizardW (talk)00:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I told my four edits were reverted by you? They were correct.WordwizardW (talk)16:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]