Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to Conyo14 for conducting 306 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up!Hey man im josh (talk)18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and nominate the History article for DYK - I'll list you as a co-nom, and feel free to add any altblurbs. Given the article's scope, there's certainly no shortage!TheKip^(contribs)18:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone a lot of edits to NHL season pages, by IPs 162.197.249.249 & 184.55.60.49. They've also made changes to several other ice hockey pages, in the last two or so months. I don't know if they're making positive changes or not.GoodDay (talk)21:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On19 February 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleHistory of the National Hockey League (2017–present), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatNational Hockey League players have not yetparticipated at the Olympics since the league enteredits second century of operation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/History of the National Hockey League (2017–present). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,History of the National Hockey League (2017–present)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

RoySmith(talk)00:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May as well get this subsection started. Keep an eye out, Khoa is up to their usual announcers crap in the main space again.Deadman137 (talk)02:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He deleted it for the prior years after it ended. I'm thinking of a way to do it in prose rather than a table.Conyo14 (talk)03:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you could find a way to squeeze it down to a paragraph that could make it suitable. If it's too much work just keep things as they are and we can just add the broadcasters to the Finals article as we currently do.Deadman137 (talk)03:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After having two games end at the same time I'd rather do the six elimination games in one day again, at least those were spread out.Deadman137 (talk)05:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137: This was only game one too! It doesn't help that the time of the games are weird to say the very least.Conyo14 (talk)05:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well don't look at tonight's schedule then. Thankfully it's only the first round where the risk for that is highest. Though it's rare where you get an overtime game taking place at the same time as two teams decide to hang their goalies out to dry.Deadman137 (talk)23:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added the missing citations for you for the two series that ended tonight, so I made up for my screw up last night, (sadly I didn't remember that the Carolina series ended yesterday).Deadman137 (talk)03:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Rantanen became the first player to record a third period playoff hat trick in league history, likely game seven specific. I'll skim the league article when it comes out. It's rare enough to consider for the lead.Deadman137 (talk)02:58, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa really? Let me reword that final statement then.Conyo14 (talk)03:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was mentioned on the Sportsnet broadcast, we'll probably need a second citation, I'm scanning for it now.Deadman137 (talk)03:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AP has him as the second player to record four points in the third period of a game seven. Still looking for the hat trick one.Deadman137 (talk)03:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one link[1]Deadman137 (talk)03:52, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not great. Ideally something from TSN or Sportsnet.Conyo14 (talk)03:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting News has it[2]. I'll keep digging in the morning to see what else is available.Deadman137 (talk)05:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The league also just published this[3] so we have enough to substantiate our claim.Deadman137 (talk)05:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That'll doConyo14 (talk)06:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for the articles to start coming out though that was the latest tying goal in a seventh game. The previous latest tying goal off the top of my head was Matt Cooke in 2004 Calgary/Vancouver series, I'm waiting for confirmation.Deadman137 (talk)03:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137: I would like a ref for the comparison to the Easter Epic. If it's in the recap ref (I don't think it is) then that'll do.Conyo14 (talk)06:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Found it.Deadman137 (talk)14:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So if Florida moves on then we know that the Western champion will have home ice in the Finals.Deadman137 (talk)01:49, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There actually was a small spacing error on the Carolina/Washington citation from last night and I already fixed it. Now I don't know why we've had two editors have been trying to change the dating format of the citation when all they needed to do was add one space.Deadman137 (talk)21:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I was legitimately wondering what was going on there. I'm glad that was a simple fix then.Conyo14 (talk)23:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't help but laugh when I realized that it was just a simple typo. I hope that we're not losing our edge.Deadman137 (talk)23:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this discussion and wanted to notify you andDeadman137 about Khoa41860 since that editor was mentioned here –Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khoa41860. So do not be suprised if a new editor comes and starts doing the usual stuff for which Khoa41860 is known. –sbaio10:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbaio: Thanks for the heads up.

Here's some weird trivia from tonight, Brad Marchand became the first player to defeat the same team five times in a seventh game. Yes I'm looking for citations.Deadman137 (talk)02:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know all the score bugs had that last night. For one player, there are too many trivial stats for that.Conyo14 (talk)09:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree, it's probably better suited for the individual player's article. The only other thing that we could add is Edmonton is the first Canadian team to make it to the conference final in consecutive seasons since the Toronto Maple Leafs in 1994. I'm sitting on that one because I know if we put it in the lead or series section we'll keep seeing every time it happens and I kind of don't want that to happen because we have enough Canadian team trivia in the article.

Honestly the only possible Canadian team trivia that would be reasonable to add at this point would be if Edmonton gets back to Finals again (first for any Canadian team in consecutive seasons since the late 80s Oilers) and if they win the Cup. Other than those two things happening there's no reason to add more.Deadman137 (talk)03:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it were the third consecutive conference finals for a Canadian team, I'd be fine with it, but two consecutive? Nah, not good enough. Technically Ottawa in 2003 and Calgary in 2004 got you beat with the statement. For the same team? Too trivial. If they make the Cup Final? Again, 2004, 2006, and 2007 had Canadian teams. For the same team making it to the Final, it just feels too trivial. It's better for the Finals article anyways.Conyo14 (talk)20:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three seems reasonable to me. Technically the last time any Canadian team made it to two consecutive conference finals was the 2006 Oilers and 2007 Senators, it could also be moot soon too. We could wind up with the southern most Finals series if we get Dallas and Florida which would be third sun belt series this decade and (as you know well) the sixth consecutive with a team from Florida.

No matter what happens we'll be there to document it and see where the ride takes us.Deadman137 (talk)03:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137: Perhaps I should be lucky the first game of the Finals is the day after I return from my long vacation. It would be if not for the fact that Wednesdays are busy nights for me, typically. However, mobile edits, if you couldn't tell from my editing, have been a struggle to say the very least. Also, should the distance trivia be mentioned again? Probably not right?

Oh trust me, there have been nights where I've been editing from a few different places. On one occasion I was editing in the middle of a field while holding an umbrella in a rain storm, so I get it. I don't think we need the distance trivia as the first occurrence covered it enough detail.

We may want to consider mentioning that Draisaitl became the fifth player to score three overtime goals in one playoff year. If he gets a fourth overtime winner this year we have to mention it because that would set a new record. The four other players to get three in one year are Mel Hill (1939), Maurice Richard (1951), Corey Perry (2017) and Matthew Tkachuk (2023).Deadman137 (talk)04:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The middle of a raining field is pretty wild. I think during the middle of my anniversary dinner with my significant other might take the cake for me.

As for Draisaitl's third OT goal, I will definitely add it to the game recap in the Finals article.Conyo14 (talk)05:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draisaitl now has the single year playoff record with four overtime goals. First player since John LeClair in 1993 to score two overtime winners in the Finals.Deadman137 (talk)03:52, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I'm running out of superlatives for you. This two-headed monster keeps on rolling and I wouldn't want to try and tackle this yearly behemoth solo. I'm hoping to not disappear for months on end like the last two years, but you never know what life brings. I'll be around tomorrow to help if we get the usual ITN crush.Deadman137 (talk)05:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On a completely unrelated note here[5] is the link for the Reinhart trivia in game six, it will cover both sentences.Deadman137 (talk)05:47, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137 Believe me, if it were solo, a lot of game tables would have inconsistencies. The random IPs and unconfirmed editors assisted somewhat at the start. That being said, IRL comes first. This year was actually the most difficult, and that includes the 2020 playoffs, since I had a lot of life events happen in the playoffs, including being out of country. However, I am glad you return. If you're around for the draft, enjoy that.Conyo14 (talk)05:50, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sure that you'd get the game tables done some time in the offseason of insert random year here. Sorry to hear about some of those events, hopefully all will be well soon.

That's one thing that I am grateful for, any family stuff that comes up is local and if I do have to leave the country for work I'm logging in here to find the channel to watch games on. 2020 was a beast like no other, four months of prep time, all the crap that surrounded the event and 130 games in the same amount of time as a normal year. I'm glad in hindsight to have been apart of that, but I hope something like that doesn't happen again. Plus a year later in 2021 I had that lovely Rupertslander section of the talk page on the playoff template dedicated to me (not sad to see that get deleted or that user be blocked).

I'm always around for the draft, night one isn't too bad. Day two is pretty much like having series ending overtime game every two to five minutes for about four hours.Deadman137 (talk)06:51, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conyo14. At 10:39 on April 20, I usedAutoWikiBroswer to check the "2025 Stanley Cup playoffs" article. It suggested some formatting changes and also suggested adding a hyphen for "second-round games" in the sentece: "First and second-round games are split between ESPN-produced telecasts (either on ESPN, ABC, or ESPN2) and TNT Sports-produced telecasts (either on TNT or TBS, with selected simulcasts on TruTV). Each U.S. team's regional broadcaster will also televise local coverage of first-round games, except for any games on ABC." I then examined the proposed changes and then made the edit.[6] At 15:51, you then reverted my edit with the edit summary noting "not a typo".[7] In this case "second-round" acts as a compound adjective modifying the noun "games." When two or more words come before a noun and together describe it, they are generally hyphenated to show that they function as a single descriptive unit. If anything, the "first" in the sentence appears it might qualify for asuspended hyphen perMOS:SUSPENDED. Can you explain why you reverted the edit? Thanks!Wikipedialuva (talk)02:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, the reason why is because I wanted to change wording altogether. Apologies, let me do that now.Conyo14 (talk)02:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for updating the wording and making the other articles consistent!Wikipedialuva (talk)03:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the wording. I shall make the other articles as consistent.Conyo14 (talk)02:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you share a similar name with a Youtube channel that covers hockey,Conyo19. Do you by any chance happen to be related?Mk8mlyb (talk)06:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They've got a good name. There are a lot with that nickname though. It's cool that they cover ice hockey too!Conyo14 (talk)07:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a place I can go to ask if a source is reliable? I could use one right now.Mk8mlyb (talk)01:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlyb: what for? I can helpConyo14 (talk)02:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article right here. The consensus on Kotaku is that articles from 2023 to now are generally not reliable, but that this is not a firm line and that articles should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.Mk8mlyb (talk)02:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlyb: This is a tricky article for sure. It's probably a fine source given it's just a ranking article, though I would pair with another source.Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources will let you know which websites are unreliable and which ones are good.Conyo14 (talk)04:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I appreciate your help. Thanks.Mk8mlyb (talk)04:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cow, did you watch the playoffs? The Panthers just scored two goals with under 4 minutes left to win! I thought they were dead!Mk8mlyb (talk)01:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a forum. Please don't use this as such.Conyo14 (talk)02:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Is there a forum of any kind on Wikipedia?Mk8mlyb (talk)03:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NoConyo14 (talk)04:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you undo my edit? I noticed you removed some information I thought was crucial.Mk8mlyb (talk)02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, just corrective editing. Remember that you're a taking a fan's pov instead of a neutral POV.Conyo14 (talk)03:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's biased about saying "the Panthers scored two goals in 11 seconds with four minutes left to take the lead"? I've seen other Stanley Cup playoffs articles say similar things. The way I see it, saying that is more informative and stands out than saying a player scored a goal and an assist.Mk8mlyb (talk)03:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, add it in. Just know that there is no "crucial" information. This is Wikipedia, not a news source.Conyo14 (talk)03:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. For the record, I realize I need to understand policy better before choosing what to edit. I just like to put some energy and life into the articles.Mk8mlyb (talk)04:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. I've been doing this consistently for nine years and believe me when I say I wish they had more life, but maintainingWP:NPOV is important when writing content. Fortunately, the flare can be seen in the Finals articles.Conyo14 (talk)04:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken a look at the2021-22 Florida Panthers page, and I think there needs to be a paragraph or statement about how the team had one of the greatest offenses in league history. Where would be a good place to put it and how would we state that?Mk8mlyb (talk)01:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source to back that statement?Conyo14 (talk)03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one right here:[8].Mk8mlyb (talk)03:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say it's one of the greatest offenses in league history, but the best since the Penguins 1995–96 season.Conyo14 (talk)04:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. Is SB Nation considered a reliable source?Mk8mlyb (talk)06:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Mk8mlyb: The following three community discussions (1,2,3) provide information about the reliability ofSB Nation. Consider checking outWikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Sources for the reliability of other hockey sources. More broadly, thereliable sources noticeboard can be a good place to ask if a source is reliable.Left guide (talk)09:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. Thank you.Mk8mlyb (talk)17:48, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleBuffalo Sabres you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)00:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. On the42 article, it states Leo Durocher was suspended after he was caught having an affair. Is this accurate to real life, or is it just something the movie made up?Mk8mlyb (talk)04:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I have an answer for you. Fortunately, sources should cover it.Conyo14 (talk)05:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources state the evidence all but confirms Durocher had an affair and it was an open secret and that it impacted his relationships in the MLB, but there's no proof he was suspended over it, instead being suspended for gambling issues.Mk8mlyb (talk)22:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't my area of expertise. I'm sure someone ofWP:MLB would be able to help thoughConyo14 (talk)22:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBuffalo Sabres you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Buffalo Sabres for comments about the article, andTalk:Buffalo Sabres/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)00:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 June 2025,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2025 Stanley Cup Finals, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.  — Amakuru (talk)15:50, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you bythe GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping2008 NHL Winter Classic retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work!~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)09:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment on the discussion section at my RFA, and just wanted to say thank you very much for your kind words. Fingers crossed I'll get some answers next week!Patient Zero^talk00:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Patient Zero Here's hoping! I'll restore my comment (or maybe it'll automatically be restored) once the discussion period starts once more. Good luck with your candidacy.Conyo14 (talk)05:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I’m not sure if it will be automatically reinstated or not, but feel free to do so yourself if it isn’t. :)Patient Zero^talk13:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the1968 Stanley Cup playoffs, the series between the North Stars and Blues has 5 games for the Blues being the home team and only 2 for the North Stars. Is there a reason for this and what is that reason?Mk8mlyb (talk)05:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlyb: The NHL corroborates this too, but here is the source[9]. Basically, theIce Follies were performing at the North Stars arena and instead of delaying the series, they moved game one to be in St. Louis.Conyo14 (talk)07:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't access the source, as it requires me to login, but I'll take your word. Does this mean that the North Stars were intended to have home-ice advantage in the series? It would seem to be the logical result of what you said.Mk8mlyb (talk)07:24, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They're seeding still indicates they were the lower seed. They just made the home ice weird in this one.Conyo14 (talk)13:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What should we do about the other playoff series that have weird home-ice setups? Is there a page that says when the current 2-2-1-1-1 setup was established?Mk8mlyb (talk)04:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Cup playoffsConyo14 (talk)05:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything there that says when the 2-2-1-1-1 format was established. It just says that the playoffs became best-of-seven in the 1930s between first place and second place and that the Stanley Cup Final was made a best-of-seven in 1939.Mk8mlyb (talk)18:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlybStanley Cup playoffs#Modern era (1993–present). It was very briefly 2-3-2, but it didn't stick around. It seems like it since the best-of-seven was introduced for the playoffs, it has always been 2-2-1-1-1.Conyo14 (talk)18:05, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further, it seems that teams had to give up the arena if there was an event such as theBarnum and Bailey Circus or theIce Follies. So, it might explain the anamolies.Conyo14 (talk)18:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then. Should we post explanations for all series in which teams had to give up the arena? I think most Stanley Cup Final pages featuring the New York Rangers have such explanations.Mk8mlyb (talk)18:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. If you can find a reference to why, even better.Conyo14 (talk)18:37, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, how long did Marty Turco shut out the Canucks in the 2007 Stars-Canucks first round series? I remember it was mentioned somewhere but I forgot what the number was.Mk8mlyb (talk)03:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

165 minutes, 45 seconds[10]Conyo14 (talk)05:26, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I thought so. Thank you. I was asking because I was doing a presentation on hockey to a class, but I went to sleep when you replied, so I couldn't see your answer. But thanks anyway.Mk8mlyb (talk)18:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleAnaheim Ducks isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)17:43, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageBoston Bruins, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Amissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)07:32, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Hockey Barnstar
		For all of your consistently thoughtful contributions atWT:NHL, working to help the ice hockey community resolve concerns raised there. Thank you.Left guide (talk)07:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you removed information from the article2025 Stanley Cup Final, believing that it was trivial. However, this is important because it was historic. TheToronto Maple Leafs were eliminated by the eventualStanley Cup champions for the first time since 2000, when theNew Jersey Devils did that. The 2025Florida Panthers ended up becoming the team to snap the Leafs' historic 23-season streak without losing a playoff series to the eventual champions. This information was obtained through NHL history and Wikipedia articles of previous seasons. Please tell me why you removed this information. Thank you.2001:56B:3FED:E39E:845E:47DC:FFF9:8E9E (talk)23:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the mobile editor is actually@Mario662629: signed out.GoodDay (talk)01:57, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They abandoned their account in anger. Also, please tell me about why you removed this important content. We might have to discuss on the talk pages.2001:56B:3FED:E39E:845E:47DC:FFF9:8E9E (talk)03:03, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was unsourced and trivial. How was it important? Who found it important? Even if it was, it would beWP:TRIVIAConyo14 (talk)04:02, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like if it was to be added, it would go in a trivia section at the bottom, according toWP:TRIVIA.2001:56B:3FED:E39E:845E:47DC:FFF9:8E9E (talk)13:35, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no bottom of the page, aside from the notes about the engraving. And you missed the most important part where it saysAvoid collections of miscellaneous facts or examples, sinceWikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of informationConyo14 (talk)14:35, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New update: It was important becauseGoogle's AI Mode, when asking it the last team to eliminate theToronto Maple Leafs and then go on to win theStanley Cup, it still responded with the 2000New Jersey Devils, rather than the updated answer, the 2025Florida Panthers. In addition, the top Google search result was a Reddit post with outdated information; it was only up to date to 2023.^[1]2001:56B:3FF1:52F7:5818:ADF6:75C5:8E99 (talk)17:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, but we can't base sourcing of Reddit nor any AI. It is simply a miscellaneous fact that cannot be placed onto I would say any Wiki article. It would be the same as saying, Edmonton, who has eliminated Los Angeles four consecutive times has lost to the eventual Stanley Cup winner four consecutive times.Conyo14 (talk)18:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloConyo14! The thread you created at theTeahouse,IABot issues, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:03, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleAnaheim Ducks haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)01:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you bythe GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helpingBrett Hull retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work!~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)17:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleWashington Capitals isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)21:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleWashington Capitals haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHickoryOughtShirt?4 --HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk)21:44, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleVerse (programming language), which you previouslymarked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted. The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verse (programming language) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion.SodiumBot (botop|talk)21:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These updates are delivered bySodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add{{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageSan Jose Sharks, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Abare URL andmissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)21:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]