This user isnot to be confused withUser:Coffee andUser:CoffeeCrumbs, who are entirely different users. Please do not use the name Coffee to refer to this user as it is ambiguous. You can use C&C.
This is aWikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other thanWikipedia, you are viewing amirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other thanWikipedia. The original talk page is located athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Coffeeandcrumbs.
Hello, Coffeeandcrumbs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visitThe Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
I just want to be the first to congratulate you for your vision and your perseverance to create the first all-space DYK set for July 21. In fact, the whole appearance of the Main Page is a credit to your pioneering vision. It just went live! Enjoy basking in the glow of your stellar achievement!Best,Yoninah (talk)00:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yoninah, thank you for my first barnstar ever! And thank you for your patient and diligent assistance in getting this going. I should say that just as much credit should go toUser:Kees08 without whom this would never have been possible. --- Coffeeandcrumbs15:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between July and September 2019.Hawkeye7 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)01:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
Hey bud, quick note to let you know I was impressed by the move discussion you raisedhere. It's sorta fascinating how controversial "Death of..." article title moves can be, even when the logic seems obvious. Perhaps all the controversy that surrounds these talks reflects the emotion that surrounds the subject of death and dying. Don't get discouraged if the RM doesn't work. Emotion often trumps reason over the short term. But in the end, the truth will out.NickCT (talk)02:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NickCT, I thank you for the kind words. These discussions are difficult but I believe they are important. It is crucial that we question our own preconceptions; objectivity and NPOV are paramount. I always ask myself, what would an alien species who speak perfect English but have no emotions give as the title of this subject? I like to say that we are all biased and we must actively fight that bias. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs)06:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for bringing more than 25 new articles to our readers' attention, in addition to the many fine articles that you yourself create. Congratulations!Yoninah (talk)16:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected asEditor of the Week in recognition of continuing efforts to improve WP. Thank you for the great contributions!(courtesy of theWikipedia Editor Retention Project)
It is my pleasure to commend User:Coffeeandcrumbs for Editor of the Week. C&C has been an editor for 3 years, and in that time they have created, and contributed to, a staggering number of quality and interesting articles. To pick a small selection of their contributions, many of which improve the encyclopaedia's coverage of women, I've particularly enjoyed readingMae Jemison,Valentina Tereshkova (GAs) andElizabeth Willing Powel (FA created from scratch). C&C also does tireless work behind the scenes, particularly atWP:ERRORS,WP:ITN andWP:DYK, and has thousands of edits at these venues. C&C is unfailingly polite, helpful, productive, and a model Wikipedian. I hope this award is a fitting recognition of their continuing efforts to improve the encyclopaedia.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
In a 3 year career they've created many quality and interesting articles improving Wikipedia's coverage of women while tirelessly working to create thousands of edits atWP:ERRORS,WP:ITN andWP:DYK. A Model editor that is polite, helpful and productive.
Heya! Recently you made an edit to a page I watch and I was really amazed by your diligence! I looked at your contributions and dang! I just wanted to say Thank you! You're doing an amazing job. :)Dillard421♂♂(talk to me)11:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.