User talk:Canpark/Archive 1

I have reviewed this article's GAN submission; the review can be foundhere.Ironholds (talk)13:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now promoted; many thanks.Ironholds (talk)14:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Binh Gia VC.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Skier Dude (talk)03:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Binh Gia VC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Courcelles03:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Ta Minh Kham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Courcelles04:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Ta Minh Kham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude2 (talk)21:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions •The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients •bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom. Past editions may be viewedhere.BrownBot (talk)20:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Central Highlands Evacuation.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim offair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meetsWikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have anexplanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is anon-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice byFairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk)07:37, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)15:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Vo_Minh_Triet.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be foundhere.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Do you want toopt out of receiving this notice?feydey (talk)12:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleHue-Da Nang Campaign you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Hue-Da Nang Campaign for eventual comments about the article. Well done!Jezhotwells (talk)20:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBattle of Bình Giã you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. SeeTalk:Battle of Bình Giã for things which need to be addressed.Jezhotwells (talk)23:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBattle of Lang Vei you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. SeeTalk:Battle of Lang Vei for things which need to be addressed.Jezhotwells (talk)03:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBattle of Ong Thanh you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. SeeTalk:Battle of Ong Thanh for things which need to be addressed.Jezhotwells (talk)14:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)21:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:29 quan750-to.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.—GFOLEYFOUR—21:54, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could only doTalk:Battle of Loc Ninh/GA1, because I have other off-wiki concerns and priorities... next I'll be around might be next week, since I will be very busy this week.FACWikicopter_{what i do}s +ccup|former01:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBattle of Kham Duc you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. SeeTalk:Battle of Kham Duc for things which need to be addressed.Jezhotwells (talk)12:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBattle of Ap Bac you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. SeeTalk:Battle of Ap Bac for things which need to be addressed. —btphelps^{(talk) (contribs)}05:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canpark, I have a couple of articles up for GA. How about returning the favor? SeeWyatt Earp orBrassiere. BTW, as a courtesy to others who need to leave you messages, you might want to considerarchiving your talk page. It's a bit cumbersome to edit when it gets so long. —btphelps^{(talk) (contribs)}21:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Truong Sa Navy.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Fut.Perf.☼15:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:RVNS Ly Thuong Kiet.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)15:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:RVNS Ly Thuong Kiet.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Fut.Perf.☼15:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have delistedWyatt Earp. The history on the talk page explains why.--TonyTheTiger(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)07:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Truong Sa Navy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Skier Dude2 (talk)04:45, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canpark, I've started the GA review of this article and have left comments atTalk:East Sea Campaign/GA1. Regards,Nick-D (talk)01:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAttack on the USNS Card‎ you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Attack on the USNS Card‎ for comments about the article. Well done!Harrison49 (talk)16:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)01:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for yourrecent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk)20:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members:Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial:Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Quyet Thang 1975.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Damiens.rf20:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Da Nang Air Base 1975.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Damiens.rf20:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Quyet Thang Squadron 1975.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Damiens.rf20:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Nguyen Thanh Trung defection.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Damiens.rf20:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News:From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial:Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)22:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:1979 Vietnam invasion.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim offair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe media description page and edit it to add{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}},without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per ournon-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Fut.Perf.☼11:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canpark,

I have a number of concerns about your writing and editing on this page. First your edits of 18 June 2011 were tagged with an "m" indicating a minor edit, but with the comment "major expansion" you should know not to use the "m" tag in this case.

Your "major expansion" included the deletion of various parts of the article including all mention of the US personnel missing in action and their recovery. You have no right to unilaterally delete these sections without providing an explanation of why you have done so. I have reinstated the sections.

Your renaming of the article was justified by your claim that "Lima Site 85 only refer to the battle on the hill top, but there were fighting around the hill as well. Google search will reveal more results for Battle of Phou Pha Thi)", actually even after your renaming a Google search of battle of Phou Pha Thi delivers 207,000 results while the Battle of Lima Site 85 delivers over 7 million results, while a search of Phou Pha Thi delivers 16 million results while Lima Site 85 delivers over 32 million results. The battle may have been all over and around the hill, but the reason for the battle was because of Lima Site 85. Unless you can provide a better justification, I will revert to the previous name.

You fail to quote at all from One Day Too Long: Top Secret Site 85 and the Bombing of North Vietnam by Timothy Castle isbn 978-0231103176 which as far as I am aware is the only book solely written about the battle. Chauhan's book on which you seem to rely for much background information is clearly unreliable as I have identified and corrected numerous errors.

You place a lot of reliance on Do's book. Unfortunately even today the Vietnamese Government persists in putting out propaganda regarding the American War and so anything produced by the Vietnamese Government and particularly the People’s Army Publishing House cannot be assumed to be a reliable source and must be approached with scepticism if it is to be used as a source at all.

You seem very keen to push articles through GA appraisal. This is not a competition, this is a collaborative effort and you should bear that in mind. You should withdraw LS-85 from GAN until it can be cleaned up.

regardsMztourist (talk)09:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For writing. For writing excellent articles. For writing excellent articles without seeking recognition. Thank you, Canpark, for your tireless work on Vietnam War articles. I think you deserve much more praise than you do right now. Keep it up.Sp33dyphil"Adastra"12:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that it took so long, but I finished the copyedit that you requested for theCambodian–Vietnamese War. I've noticed that you added content while I was copyediting- if you continue to add to the article and want me to look over it, just drop me a note on my talk page. --Slon02 (talk)02:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed:Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)22:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canpark, you have once again made substantial and unjustified changes to this page, which you have marked m. You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know this is unacceptable behaviour. If you do not desist I will refer this to an Administrator.Mztourist (talk)14:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you ask for a second opinion atTalk:Battle of Lima Site 85/GA1 for memorials and including the section into the aftermath. At present its not going to make GA.Jim Sweeney (talk)11:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed:WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go tothis page.BrownBot (talk)21:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Xuan Loc airfield.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am abot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a{{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this noticeafter the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, clickhere to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it offhere and leave a message onmy owner's talk page.

Thank you.DASHBot (talk)05:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:USNS Card DRV Stamp.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.ww2censor (talk)03:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed:Remembering 9/11

		TheGood Article Barnstar
		Thanks Canpark for helping to promoteCambodian–Vietnamese War toGood Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up.Sp33dyphil"Adastra"05:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thought you might be interested inWikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (20,843 articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends.Sp33dyphil"Adastra"00:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well done-SCB '92 (talk)10:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent GAAction of 7 May 1968 and GANAction of 16 June 1968 have been raised for discussion atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Is the shooting down of 1 aircraft during the Vietnam war notable? Does it deserve GA status? andWikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Is the shooting down of one aircraft during the Vietnam war notable? Does it justify GA status?Mztourist (talk)13:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is being considered for deletion, see:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action of 7 May 1968Mztourist (talk)20:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is being considered for deletion, see:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action of 16 June 1968Mztourist (talk)20:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews:Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed:Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay:Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay:Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed:DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Hi there. Just inviting you to theMelbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there!SteveBot (talk)01:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)[reply]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do sohere. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of thecoordinators,Nick-D (talk) andEd ^{[talk][majestic titan]}22:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)You were sent this message because you are a listed as amember of theMilitary history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay:Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed:Hchc's English Castles

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at themeetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-)SteveBot (talk)22:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed:Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at themeetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow!SteveBot (talk)03:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed:The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview:Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed:Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed:Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview:Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed:Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed:Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of thecurrent coordinators on their talk page.This message was delivered here because you are amember of the Military history WikiProject. –Military history coordinators (about the project •what coordinators do) 08:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles:The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews:AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed:Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews:Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed:The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed:Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview:Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed:Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Melbourne Meetup Next:6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus Previous:25 November 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are atWikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there!John Vandenberg05:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered usingreplace.py to all users inVictoria)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed:Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview:Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed:Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Thank you for uploadingFile:126th SFG Southwest Cay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.-- Rrburke (talk)13:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed:ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed:Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed:Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview:What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed:Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Kirill ^[talk]17:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed:Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed:AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview:Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed:TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks atBritain's War Machine Interview:Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks atThe Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed:Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed:TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview:World War I editors Op-ed:TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading free images/media such asFile:Camp Holloway 1965-66.JPG to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is anotherWikimedia Foundation project calledWikimedia Commons, a central media repository for allfree media. In the future, please upload media there instead (seem:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other languageWikipedias can use them too, as well as our manysister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, seeWikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may viewyour previous uploads). Please note thatnon-free content, such as images claimed asfair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons.Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! --Fuwuyuan (talk)13:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed:TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

This page is being considered for deletion, see:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hoa Da – Song MaoMztourist (talk)09:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for theMilitary historian of the year andMilitary history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview:2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed:TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed:TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed:TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed:TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview:Featured picture participants Op-ed:TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles:Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews:Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed:We can (not) advance Timeline:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours,Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay:Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed:TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed:TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed:TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed:TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed:TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline:Events of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed:TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed:Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed:TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge andWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the currentWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}01:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview:A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay:Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed:TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay:Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed:TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed:TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction ofFair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking placeat the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there.MediaWiki message deliveryMediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users inCategory:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself toCategory:Opted-out of message delivery

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed:TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed:Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Thanks for uploadingFile:H 4 ill 639759 cambodia-phnom penh-1979-61.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)19:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed:TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed:Nick-D talks photography Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea Op-ed:TomStar81 on the October Revolution Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917 Timeline:This month in World War I

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918 Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg Op-ed:TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians Review essay:K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military Op-ed:TomStar81 on the Red Baron Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:This month's external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at a classic US official history Op-ed:TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18 Timeline:This month in World War I

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team. Cheers,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]