Please read the Talk page. The NCAA and OSU both agree that a vacated contest means, no win for the penalized school. This is all clearly laid out. Keep making your edit and sooner or later you'll be blocked from all editing. Thanks.JohnInDC (talk)02:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history atMichigan-Ohio State football rivalry shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.JohnInDC (talk)03:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After you are done reviewing the prohibitions on edit wars, you should also take a look atWP:Civility andWP:No personal attacks.JohnInDC (talk)03:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atMichigan-Ohio State football rivalry, you may beblocked from editing.JohnInDC (talk)10:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youvandalize Wikipedia, as you did atMichigan-Ohio State football rivalry.JohnInDC (talk)15:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.JohnInDC (talk)11:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWP:AN3#User:Campb292 reported by User:JohnInDC (Result: ). You seem to have brokenWP:3RR atMichigan–Ohio State football rivalry. An admin might choose to block your account. It would be in your interest to respond to the report and agree to stop warring on the issue of the vacated scores. Thank you,EdJohnston (talk)19:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked temporarily from editing foredit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.   the panda ₯’20:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try to reboot this discussion, eh?

I apologize if it seemed like a cold welcome to the project; for what it is worth, it always helps to discuss edits and disputes on the Talk page of the article in question, particularly ones that seem to generate controversy. In the case of the Ohio State vacated games, there's already a lot of water under the bridge on the subject. The gist of it it that, when OSU vacated its victories and the NCAA agreed, the official result of those games - historical outcomes notwithstanding - became "nothing" for Ohio State. OSU no longer claims the wins, and the NCAA doesn't recognize them. As a result, where those games are described in Wikipedia articles, the historical outcome is shown (as it was at the MIchigan - OSU rivalry page), which makes clear what happened on the day the game was played, but, the contest is not described or tallied as a "win" or "victory" for the penalized team, because after the sanctions, it isnot a win any longer. There are extensive (and pretty convoluted) discussions of this atTalk:Michigan–Ohio_State_football_rivalry#OSU_vacated_victories_.28July_2011.29, as well asWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_football/Archive_9#Dealing_with_vacated_awards.2C_records_and_wins andWikipedia:WikiProject_College_football/Vacated_victories.

Feel free to raise these issues at the article talk page if you want further discussion. Going forward though it would be better if you didn't keep making the same edit repeatedly, in face of opposition from other editors who indicate that prior consensus is otherwise. I'll follow this up with a Welcome template too, which has a lot of useful links about Wikipedia policies and practices. Thanks.JohnInDC (talk)21:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider, and respond to, what I've said above rather than resuming your edit-warring. You will only find yourself blocked again, more likely for an even longer period. Thanks.JohnInDC (talk)23:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you abelatedwelcome to Wikipedia, Campb292. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you foryour contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post ontalk pages you shouldsign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message onmy talk page, consultWikipedia:Questions, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!JohnInDC (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)JohnInDC (talk)21:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.JohnInDC (talk)23:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Looks like you've been around long enough to know better, but here's your formal warning. The next time will result in a block.Jauerback^dude?/_dude.03:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]