Coherent reply policyIf I put a message on your talk page, I will be watching that page for a reply. If you leave a message here, I will reply here, unless you request otherwise. |
|---|
Born2cycle Talk Archives | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than30 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3. |
We're both agree on opposing the proposal at theTalk:Syracuse discussion. As far as wording, I think your case would be much more persuasive without the words "stupid" and "disruptive" inthis edit.
If you agree, you might consider either collapsing or refactoring that one reply. -RevelationDirect (talk)22:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Born2cycle,I saw your contributions to theAurora Innovation article. I represent a company in the self-driving truck industry and am exploring the possibility of having a neutral, policy-compliant article drafted for Wikipedia. This company is listed among the industry players on theself-driving truck entry and has been the subject of extensive media coverage including Fox News & WSJ.
Would you be open to discussing this? It will be my pleasure to fully disclose my role and, upon request and your advisement that this would be within policy, share a database of specific independent sources.
Thanks,MikeMhanbery (talk)19:48, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Principal Naming Criteria has beennominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)20:30, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK Parliament constituencies) was changed to disambiguate only when necessary perWikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC on pre-emptive disambiguation in constituency article titles. Also a further note thatAmakuru made about usingClacton (constituency) instead ofClacton (UK Parliament constituency) when disambiguation is needed but it is the only constituency seems a good idea. This was discussed atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive325#On the underlying issue... where it was noted that the titles could be expected to be more general rather than specific topics namelyLeeds North West refering to the area ofLeeds in general. As far as films and songs go many of them have generic names but there was apparently consensus to only use qualifiers when necessary but as far as villages likeRamsholt go it would be silly to haveRamsholt, Suffolk as there is no reason anyone would expect anything else.Crouch, Swale (talk)23:10, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]