Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Beach00

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedians,


Hello, and welcome to my talk page. I am a mainly mobile user due to work,please refer to mobile edit default summary policy before posting.

We value all members of the Wikipedia community and refrain from discriminating against those who are mobile users and subject to the known handicaps in the default interfaces.


Beach00,

Founder of the Wikipedia Mobile Editor Advocacy Association


Welcome to MILHIST

[edit]

Hello and welcome to theMilitary history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of theproject coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around!Anotherclown (talk)00:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

[edit]
 

Time is running out to voting for theMilitary Historian andNewcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to allactive members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running itsMarch Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be foundhere for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards,AustralianRupert (talk) &MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators,AustralianRupert (talk)10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

[edit]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: theMilitary Historian of the Year and theMilitary History Newcomer of the Year. Theco-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage:here andhere. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GAN orWP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Beach00(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good Evening, I am writing to request reconsideration of my block. Though I have over 1200+ edits since 2016, I acknowledge that what I engaged in is seen as vandalism, and I want to state clearly that I understand this behavior violated the community’s trust and the project’s standards. I have donated to Wikipedia and Wikipedia Foundation many times over the past decade. Likewise I have expressed full regret for what occurred and I take full responsibility for my actions, and I deeply regret causing disruption. I am humbly asking to be unblocked from community edits. As per Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits) I am above the 99.9 percentile of Wikipedia users by number of edits. Thus I believe that my additions to the community outweigh the drunken block placed upon my 10+ year old account.Beach00 (talk)00:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An unblock request that smacks of "don't you know who I am?" isn't going to have the effect you intend it to have. The number of times you have donated is utterly irrelevant. The number of edits you have is also irrelevant, as is how long your account has existed. Whatis relevant is that you went on a spree of disruptive edits, andaccused one of the editors reverting you of vandalism. Alsodrunken block - even if the explanation given in your previous unblock requests (others: see link below) is correct, while I feel sorry for your loss, it doesn't change the fact that you went directly toa hot-button topic to make a known controversial edit as a result, onmultiple articles. If you want to be unblocked, you need to give assurances that you will not be editing under the influence again, and you need to do it without tooting your own contribution horn. -The BushrangerOne ping only02:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noteprevious unblock requests (which were not processed) and replies to them that were removed by the editor before preparing this one. -The BushrangerOne ping only02:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request for Administrator

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Beach00(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is intended forThe Bushranger Previous requests for relief from these block restrictions were erased solely due to my uncertainty regarding the appropriate procedure for appeal or further action here. As this circumstance is entirely without precedent in my experience, I find myself in a state of considerable confusion. Lack of ability even edit or reply to others on my own user page compounds this perplexity. Such confusion may, regrettably, give the unintended impression that I seek to obscure or withhold prior information, though that information remains available for review in its original context within my history. In regard to why I should be unblocked from the English language Wikipedia, there certainly was self-congratulatory comments I made about my time contributing to Wikipedia and I know this may not help. I allowed poor judgment to influence my actions, and in doing so, I disrupted our environment of opposition in regard to personal attacks. I want to acknowledge the harm caused, both to the accuracy of the articles and to the trust of the community. I take full responsibility for this lapse in sobriety and intent. Nevertheless I remain sincere in saying that over the years, I have worked carefully to improve entries, cite reliable sources, and help new editors learn the guidelines. Those contributions came from a sober and genuine respect for knowledge. I believe I can continue to provide positive and thoughtful edits, now with greater self-awareness and restraint.Beach00 (talk)06:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As your talk page access has been revoked, further genuine unblock requests must be made usingWP:UTRS. -The BushrangerOne ping only05:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello ChatGPT, I will now revoke your talk page access.~ ToBeFree (talk)19:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because anadministrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read theguide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to theUnblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 ~ ToBeFree (talk)19:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beach00&oldid=1321551142"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp