/Archive 1

You have beenindefinitely blocked by theArbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review theguide to appealing blocks, then appeal byemailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address:arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

ArbCom have taken over this block and are dealing with the matter. Any queries about any aspect of this case or this user are to be addressed directly to ArbCom. Badmachine has been in touch with ArbCom, and Badmachine is aware that ArbCom are taking over this block.

For the Arbitration Committee.SilkTork^{✔Tea time}15:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was less active for a couple of weeks, having been abroad, and apparently hadn't checked in here for a while. I'm sorry this happened, Badmachine, regardless of fault etc. I wish you the best.Drmies (talk)21:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectRick Santorum's Yahoo problem. Since you had some involvement with theRick Santorum's Yahoo problem redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.SirLagsalott (talk)16:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Jereme Richmond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleWaifu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waifu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.groig (talk)14:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Ohio Penitentiary (1931).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectWhats the frequency kenneth has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27 § Whats the frequency kenneth until a consensus is reached.Dawnbails (talk)21:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]