Hello, I'mAviationFreak. An edit you recently made toDaniel Cormier seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, thesandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.AviationFreak💬04:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAssassin7177! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest atthe Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors likeWorm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered byHostBot on behalf of theTeahouse hosts 16:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!Salimfadhley (talk)13:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salimfadhley (talk) Thanks for helping me out friend. I am truly grateful to you. I have made 2 corrections as you told me to do. But won't removing the entire cast list make the article too small. Should I look for a strong source or should I delete it.Assassin7177 (talk)

HiAssassin7177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Creating a new article, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!Theroadislong (talk)15:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!Theroadislong (talk)15:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAssassin7177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Changing the title of an article, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears toread more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from aneutral point of view, and should refer to a range ofindependent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia'sverifiability policy and thenotability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a PR notice for a non notable youtubechannel. The references a re usual PR that is found in newspapers

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Karikku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go toDraft:Karikku, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk)23:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was no need to moveDraft:Karikku toDraft:Karikku (Web Series) ; there is no article called "Karikku" so adisambiguation of the title is unnecessary. In addition, what the draft is called is not that important since it is not part of the encyclopedia – but since the draft and the articleKarikku have a history with multiple deletions it is preferrable to stick to that title, to avoid misunderstandings. I have moved it back for you. Regards, --bonadeacontributionstalk17:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)18:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

InWikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#My article was declined (permalink), you wroteThis [that is, asking for an explaintion of whyDraft:Karikku was declined]is really important for me.

I am curious, why is it important to you?

Actually, don't answer that. It's a rhetorical question. However, YOU need to know why it is important to you. YOU need to know if you are "too closely connected" to the subject to write about it objectively, with aneutral point of view. It is best to avoid writing on topics that you feel strongly about or which you cannot be objective about for whatever reason.

Please also readWP:Conflict of interest andWP:Paid editing disclosure. If you have aconflict of interest with respect to this or any other topic you write about, it ishighly recommended that you follow that guideline. It is alsohighly recommended that you disclose any conflicts of interest you have. Failure to follow these rules isvery likely to make editing Wikipedia a very frustrating experience for you.

If thepaid editing disclosure applies to you, youmust follow the rules outlined on that page. It isnot optional.davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)18:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been asked aboutconflict of interest. I will point out that when an editor is as disruptively persistent in asking to have a draft approved, many editors assume that they probably are being paid, and that they are in a hurry to have the article approved so that they can be paid. That is exactly how some of us are viewing your questions. What is especially annoying and suspicious is asking other editors to edit your draft for you so that it will be accepted (and then you will perhaps be paid for the unpaid work of volunteers). You are being disruptive and are likely to betopic-banned or blocked.Robert McClenon (talk)06:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I have committed a mistake (talk). It was just personal interest that drove me to this topic and nothing else, and it was just the passion to get it published, for many others, who support Karikku like me that drove me to try to know more

If a reviewer considers the subject likely to be notable they will approve it. Please do not post about it on my tallk p. again. DGG ( talk)15:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)17:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)18:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:John Toffan. Thanks!Robert McClenon (talk)02:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Toffan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk)18:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Should i rename my article, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Changing the username, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Arthur H. Warner, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp💬06:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,How to tag my article, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,My article was declined, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jstalins: Jstalins talk I am a new editor and I created a new article on the malayalam youtube channel- Karikku. An AFC editor who was impressed by my article, but did not know about the relevant sources used in it, asked it as a question in Wikiproject India. He recieved two indirect but positive responses, and is waiting for more. Please give your valuable comments at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#I need a notability check here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#I_need_a_notability_check_here)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Karikku. Thanks!davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)15:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary: The draft is in the process of being accepted. It is on hold because the target page is "create protected." I have asked the administrator who protected it to remove the protection.davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)15:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karikku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)18:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Reliable sources, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,List of Bengaluru FC records, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. The sources do not support the claims in the article.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.bonadeacontributionstalk23:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atOrder of the Phoenix (fictional organisation). Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use yoursandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Captain Calm (talk)13:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Deleting a redirect, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. Your question has been answered at theTeahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions arearchived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added byTheroadislong (talk)16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC). (You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

It's great fun trying to edit theWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources list isn't it? I had a good few goes myself recently. From the commentary and the discussion, I reckon that 'generally unreliable' is a more appropriate classification than 'no consensus'. I have amended the entry appropriately, but should you disagree, feel free to undo my change.86.140.67.152 (talk)13:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Atlantis, can you explain why you restored your addition onWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources inSpecial:Diff/988488109? Please note that one discussion posted doesn't merit an addition on the perennial list, let alone within 48 hours of the one discussion being started.Tayi Arajakate_Talk14:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,I request you to help me, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177. Wanted to let you know that I've reverted most of your contributions toYoel Romero, as they contain excessive bias and personal opinions, such as "one of the greatest 3-round fights in the history of theUFC" and "the fight was expected to be explosive and eventful". The sources you're citing aren't really optimal either, live stats of the bouts aren't an excuse to back up personal opinions.If you want to contribute that's fine, but I'd suggest to stop editing the article bc you aren't really being of much help to be honest, the article is already pretty complete and doesn't contain a lot of flaws that can be fixed in major changes to the page. Thanks.PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 16:36 , 15 November 2020 (UTC)

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Republic TV, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the karikku page; I didnt add anything more into the page to make some grammatical errors. Using # and some other characters is not as per wikipedia standards. So please clarify to me the actual reason for reverting the edit. May be you could have explained that in the edit history. Anyway Im going for the same cleanup in that page. You can ping me for any updates. Thank youShahoodu (talk)04:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the articleMazhavil entertainment awards 2019 has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to participate in the discussionShahoodu (talk)04:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following was your comment in one of your talk page discussions. ""It was just personal interest that drove me to this topic and nothing else, and it was just the passion to get it published, for many others, who support Karikku like me that drove me to try to know more"". Hence, I have declared your COI on theKarikku page. ThankyouShahoodu (talk)04:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedOne Day International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIndian cricket. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to apologize if my action had hurt you. Believe me, I just want the editors to follow the guidelines and strictly act against disruptive editing and vandalism. When I went through your talk page, I happened to notice that comment so I wanted to declare COI. Sorry for my action if you were acting on god faith. By the way you cam remove the COI if you want. Or should I do that??Shahoodu (talk)15:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also apologized on your talk page, but it got mixed up and is now part of another heading.--Atlantis77177 (talk)15:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw that. Im not experienced in moving contents between talk pages. You better seek help of some other users. And please remove the COI. I hope that sorts this mess we createdShahoodu (talk)15:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		For your civility and cooperation withUser:Shahoodu regardingKarikku.davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)17:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazhavil entertainment awards 2019 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Listen, I don't know how to explain this to you if it's not already obvious, but nominatingJoe Biden andDonald Trump for GA at this moment, of all moments, is anextremely bad idea. Among other things, there's no way the can meet the stability criterion. I urge you to withdraw the nominations immediately.EEng07:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Listen. (perEEng) - something is plainly very wrong withyour review of my GA nomination ofVirabhadrasana. I assume this must be a fit of pique for some action I took on an edit of yours, but that can't explain your erratic nominations at GA as documented in EEng's thread above. That kind of behaviour is uncollegiate and unacceptable here on Wikipedia, and of course it can get you blocked. If you think I made a mistake, tell me and we can discuss it; I'm more than happy to explain.Chiswick Chap (talk)09:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap:, if I have made an error, I apologize and give you permissions to revert my errored edits.--Atlantis77177 (talk)09:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you, but we now need to remove the page altogether and put the article back where it was in the GAN queue, since you have actually not addressed the state of the article AT ALL - for instance, it is fully cited. Please do not undertake GA reviews (or any other task) without taking the time first to understand what that task entails. I've asked a member of the GA team to sort the matter out.Chiswick Chap (talk)10:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Chiswick Chap, since you're already enmeshed in this, can you (while you're at it) do whatever needs to be done to un-nominateJoe Biden andDonald Trump -- see top of this (merged) thread.EEng19:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree with you, EEng, that the nominations are inappropriate at this time. Atlantis77177, would you mind removing your nominations fromTalk:Joe Biden andTalk:Donald Trump as soon as possible please, to save a lot of needless work and complication - that would be much appreciated.Chiswick Chap (talk)19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think he did that once already, when I first posted here; someone put it back. And now someone's removed them again -- and here I'm talking only about the notice on the article talk pages. I think the deeper problem is to untangle the noms from the GA review apparatus, and I was hoping you knew which levers to pull to do that.EEng21:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did exactly as you said. This must be someone else.--#bodyContent a[title="Assassin77177"] { background-color: #00BFFF; color: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; } (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It seems pretty clear that Atlantis77177 doesn't know enough about the GA process or how to apply its criteria to either review or nominate: while the review said it was failed, it wasn't actually failed at the article's talk page, so the nomination was still open when I found it. While we figure out how to proceed, I've upped the template's page number so the nomination retains its seniority and a new review can be opened at any time. If you prefer,Chiswick Chap, we could instead put out a call for a new reviewer to take over the review from Atlantis77177. (Note that the Biden and Trump nominations should never have been made: people who have not made significant contributions to an article should not nominate them unless they have previously consulted with the significant editors on the article's talk page—had this been done, the answer would certainly have been "not at this time" due to the inherent instability, even beyond whether it met the other criteria.)

(Added after edit conflict): Atlantis77177, the Trump nomination was properly deleted, but when you attempted to remove the Biden nomination, more than the nomination itself was deleted inthis edit], so it was reverted, but another editor later deleted just the GA nominee template. That's what EEng was referring to.BlueMoonset (talk)06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About a quarter of an hour afterBlueMoonset's post above, younominatedPresident of India for GA. Three minutes later, you nominatedPrime Minister of India, followed byIndo-European languages,BTS, andRafael Nadal – five GA nominations within 25 minutes! The last three nominations were quickly reverted by an editor who observed that you had no contributions to those articles. You haven't edited the articlesPresident of India andPrime Minister of India either, nor had you made any edits to those article talk pages to discuss the nomination with other editors, and I have removed the nominations. Why did you nominate these articles for GA? Or, for that matter,Sachin Tendulkar,Cristiano Ronaldo, andConor McGregor (which you nominated yesterday, all three of which were quickly removed for the same reason)? Evaluating whether an article is a good candidate for a GA nomination requires experience, and it takes much more than a couple of minutes to make that kind of judgment, even for a very experienced editor. It also looks like you hadn't consulted theinstructions which explain what the requirements are.

Please get alot more editing experience before you start participating in this kind of behind-the-scenes work. A few days ago you also made a couple of not very constructive edits to project space pages – [1] and[2] – inserting an article you created yourself in the assessment table, which in itself is a questionable choice, and not doing it correctly. And a final thing: it looks like you have recently edited your signature so it displays your previous user name. Why? --bonadeacontributionstalk11:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did atTalk:Hinduism, you may beblocked from editing.

You nominated Hinduism for GA despite the fact that you have not been involved in editing it. You apparently did not take the time to investigate why it was de-listed, you did not start a discussion atTalk:Hinduism to make the case for the nominationas I advised you to do here, and the nomination was againstthe advice of one editor who is has a lot of experience with GAs as well asanother very experienced editor who has done a lot of work on that article. Please take some time to get familiar with what aGood Article actually is and what the requirements are, and please get more editing experience before you get involved in that process. Thank you.bonadeacontributionstalk09:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring. Theconsensus is clear. ReadWP:Edit warring andWP:Consensus. If you keep edit warring over this, you will beWP:Blocked.Flyer22 Frozen (talk)04:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Copyright, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Is this vandalism?, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Rick O'Connel, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRick O'Connell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAlex O'Connell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of these need work. Most of the references are brief mentions of the characters. Refs about the actors who play the avatar roles do not contribute to the avatars' notability. Lengthy plot summaries do not belong in articles about the characters, only in articles about the movies. Alternatively, these should be deleted, and content about the fictional characters exist as content in the articles about the movies.David notMD (talk)11:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Republic TV, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,A doubt, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onStar Gold; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing._signed,Rosguill^talk20:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm an user from English Wikisource currently dealing withs:Index:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf. I found that normal OCR cannot correctly identify some Malayalam characters ons:Page:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf/1 ands:Page:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf/2.

As an active user onWikiProject Kerala, I hope that you can help with the transcription of these two pages by inserting the missing characters. They have been marked properly by "language characters" templates, and can be done by replacing them with the corresponding Malayalam characters.

I'll appreciate your useful assistance, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk)07:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: I am so sorry, but even though I am fluent with the language, I am a novice, here inWikipedia, as well as with the digital and literary field. I think it would be better for you to go to anyone else inWikiProject Kerala. So sorry for dissapointing you.--Atlantis77177 (talk)08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: From my basic knowledge, every important point is stated in bothMalayalam andEnglish. ie;- Every Malayalam statement is the translation of its preceeding English statement.--Atlantis77177 (talk)08:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that the problems have been solved by another user. Thanks for your attention!廣九直通車 (talk)08:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Stallone-Schwarzenegger rivalry, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article onAnoop Sasikumar, one of the upcoming writers in Malayalam literature and an economist, is facing deletion. You may find the discussionhere. Please look into it and should you feel that the subject of the article is notable, please post your opinion in the discussion. Malayalam is spoken by a small number of people, hence it is natural that what is notable here may not carry the same weight elsewhere. But still we may try our little mite.--jojo@nthony (talk)03:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answered atWP:TEA#Freddie Mercury's nationality, but forgot to ping you, so leaving a note about it here. cheers!Pelagic ( messages ) – (15:02 Sat 23, AEDT)04:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late response on Karikku. I have removed the notability maintenance tag as the article clearly satisfies notability criteria for web content. Let's see if anyone raises any red flags.--Anoopkn (talk)18:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiAtlantis77177! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Freddie Mercury's nationality, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:09, Thursday, January 28, 2021 (UTC)

Hello there. I had to fail your DYK nomination atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Prem Nazir as it does not pass the newest criteria as part of the rules atWP:DYK. I suggest reading through these rules that I've linked above. I also saw that your nomination atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Gary Lineker was also failed for the same reason by a different user. Hopefully you will be encouraged to nominate again at DYK after reading and understanding these DYK rules. Thank you for your nominaions! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk)05:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of reviewingDoraemon sometime in the near future. I just want to know if you are still active so you will reply to my review, since you haven't edited in over 2 weeks. If you do not reply to this message in one week, I will remove the GA nom template. Have a good day.Link20XX (talk)05:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: I'm definetly active. I just felt that the article was ready(Humbly). You can expect 100% coorporation from me.@Link20XX:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleDoraemon you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofLink20XX --Link20XX (talk)15:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDoraemon you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:Doraemon for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofLink20XX --Link20XX (talk)16:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Adityan Rajesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)07:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Georgina Rodriguez (model), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)00:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Georgina Rodriguez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!23:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Aaron Crow (performer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)05:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleLamar Jackson you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)19:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLamar Jackson you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:Lamar Jackson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)20:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Aaron Crow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!04:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKarikku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karikku (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Muhammed Ali vs. Joe Frazier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)01:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Atlantis77177! The list you nominated,List of Houston Texans first-round draft picks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers,PresN (talk) viaFACBot (talk)00:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Muhammed Ali vs. Joe Frazier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!06:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Atlantis77177! The list you nominated,List of UEFA Champions League hat-tricks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers,PresN (talk) viaFACBot (talk)00:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject KeralaNewsletter JULY 2024

Newly Nominated content Western Ghats Open tasks You can add your suggestions foropen taskshere Articles to be improved Malabar River Festival Edamalayar Edayattoor Erattayar Ezhuvathiruthy Gayathripuzha River High Range, Kerala Holy Land Chalakudy Irumbuzhi

WikiProject Kerala Main page talk Participants Newsletter talk  →Subscribe  →Contriute  →Archive Article alerts Popular pages Articles Delsort Todo tasks Cleanup Templates Sandbox User group Miscellaneous We need more contributors for the newsletter. Feel free to add your ideashere We want to give the newsletter a unique name. Please add your suggestionshere. Events These are some of the events in Kerala in the month of July Malabar River Festival, 25-28 July, 2024 Muharram, 16 or 17 July, 2024

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

---

Sent byPath slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala.© Copyleft 2024.
Gohere to unsubscribe if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annual Cricket Newsletter – Issue I, December 2024 • Published by the Cricket WikiProject • •About the project •Newsroom •Subscribe •Archives •

Annual newsletter to be lauched [edit] WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titledThe Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated. Project news: Project news fromWP:CRIC including the list ofAwards presented in 2024 and the final results ofContests held in 2024. Article news: Article news fromWP:CRIC including list ofFAC,FLC,FPC,PR,GAN,ITN,RD etc. from 2024. Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway. You're receiving this message because, you've been added to themailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You! Upcoming contests [edit] Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October. Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon. Visit thecontests page for the latest information. Ongoing discussions [edit] A discussion about merging the child WikiProjectsWP:IPL,WP:BPL,WP:PSL andWP:LPL back intoWP:CRIC as taskforces iscurrently ongoing in the project talk page. •Contribute to the newsletter •Subscribe to the newsletter •Join the WikiProject •Project discussions •Contests • You're receiving this message because, you've been added to themailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here • Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • •About the project •Contests •Mailing list •CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators:AssociateAffiliate andVestrian24Bio •

–MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed atWikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visitingWikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Members/Active.

Thank you!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:00, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Following thediscussion took place atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket, set of new task forces have been created and has been added to theWikiProject banner as well.
  1. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/ICC cricket task force
  2. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Women's cricket task force
  3. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Africa cricket task force
  4. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Americas cricket task force
  5. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Asia cricket task force
  6. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/EAP cricket task force
  7. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Europe cricket task force
• Everyone interested in the topic are welcome to join the task forces!
• Also, you are requested to mark the articles under the scope of each task force by adding the relevant parameters to thetalkpage banner:

  |ICC=yes forICC cricket task force

  |Women's=yes forWomen's cricket task force

  |Africa=yes forAfrica cricket task force

  |Americas=yes forAmericas cricket task force

  |Asia=yes forAsia cricket task force

  |EAP=yes forEAP cricket task force

  |Europe=yes forEurope cricket task force

This message was sent to you because you have been added to the WikiProject Cricket's news mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate inThe World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦Dr. Blofeld18:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]