User talk:Aryanprince
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Aryanprince, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visitThe Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, orclick here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one ofyour recent edits, such as the edit you made toSerbs, did not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at thewelcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please usethe sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Zoupan17:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat for the last time, do not repeat your disruptive editing. That data is present inGenetic studies on Serbs, which is linked in the ethnography section. The various theories on the ethnonym is present atNames of Serbs and Serbia, which is, again, linked in that section.--Zoupan23:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Zoupan02:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. When you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure tosign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or
) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk)02:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding theBalkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Further notice: You have been engaging in disruptivetendentious editing atSerbs. If you continue, you will very likely be banned from the topic area.Fut.Perf.☼09:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia'sno original research policy by adding your personal analysis orsynthesis into articles, as you did atSerbs, you may beblocked from editing. --Zoupan22:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atSerbs shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Thomas.W talk19:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Because of your ongoing edit-warring onSerbs you are nowtopic-banned from making any edits related to Serbs or Serbia, in either discussions or article edits, for a period of6 months. This will be logged underWP:AC/DSL according to the discretionary sanctions rule referenced above.Fut.Perf.☼19:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aryanprince, you have been blocked for 1 week for breach of your topic ban.Fut.Perf.☼21:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBarek. I noticed that you made a change to an article,Snow, but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see thereferencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you. ---Barek(talk •contribs) -17:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.User:HopsonRoad13:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]