User talk:ArkHyena
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, ArkHyena, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).==References=={{Reflist}} | The Original Barnstar |
| Hey, thank you for joining the discussion and giving me very important points (like JunoCam already being damaged at this point). Also, I hope you don't mind me asking: Are you a furry also? ThanksIapetusCallistus (talk)15:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
I reverted your (assumedly mistaken) edit onRegular moon without realising you'd already done so. Please feel free to re-add your minor edits prior to that, and sorry for causing you some extra work!Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk)19:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On18 April 2024,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleWright Mons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatan unusual mountain onPluto may have onceerupted water instead of lava? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Wright Mons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Wright Mons), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk·contribs)00:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleWright Mons you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGeneralissima --Generalissima (talk)16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
| The Original Barnstar |
| It is so unbelievably cool that we have an article on theclimate of Triton. Makes me proud to be a Wikipedian. Thanks and keep up the great work.jengod (talk)03:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
The articleWright Mons you nominated as agood article has passed
; seeTalk:Wright Mons for comments about the article, andTalk:Wright Mons/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGeneralissima --Generalissima (talk)02:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCryovolcano you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofFritzmann2002 --Fritzmann2002 (talk)15:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleRegular moon you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPencilsforall --Pencilsforall (talk)01:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleRegular moon you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Regular moon andTalk:Regular moon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPencilsforall --Pencilsforall (talk)00:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleRegular moon you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Regular moon for comments about the article, andTalk:Regular moon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPencilsforall --Pencilsforall (talk)00:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission ofRuach Planitia at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!B3251 (talk)23:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On15 May 2024,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleClimate of Triton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatTriton, a moon of Neptune,has thin clouds that are likely made of nitrogen ice crystals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Climate of Triton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Climate of Triton), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk)00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On22 May 2024,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleRuach Planitia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thata large basin on Neptune's moonTriton may have once been filled with liquid watercryolava, similar to how liquid silicates fill lava lakes on Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Ruach Planitia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Ruach Planitia), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
RoySmith(talk)00:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCryovolcano you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cryovolcano for comments about the article, andTalk:Cryovolcano/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofFritzmann2002 --Fritzmann2002 (talk)14:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I've noticed in the recent changes log that you copied fromEagle (Meridiani Planum crater) toEagle (crater). This is a "cut-and-paste" move and is discouraged. I've requested a history merge for now. I recommend requesting a move atWP:RM/TM instead in such cases. Thank you!ObserveOwl (chit-chat •my doings)08:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The infoboxes you have been replacing are not redundant. The ones you have removed included a link to the appropriate quadrangle (Debussy, Eminescu, etc). Please revert the edits or suggest another solution.Jstuby (talk)18:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articlePharos (crater) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCocobb8 --Cocobb8 (talk)23:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articlePharos (crater) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Pharos (crater) for comments about the article, andTalk:Pharos (crater)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCocobb8 --Cocobb8 (talk)16:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Come, now, you can't just leave it at that and not tell us what the objectively awesomest one is. :) (If I might guess – Titan?)Double sharp (talk)07:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, since I saw you wroteregular moon, and because I find it amusing to ponder classification: would you generally consider Luna a regular satellite? I am inclined to think it stands somewhat apart, because while it wasn't captured, it's also far enough out that its precession is primarily controlled by the Sun. (I also am somewhat in two minds about Iapetus. Though of course, this is more a personal-opinion question, since I suspect the sources are generally in accord that these two are regular.)Double sharp (talk)03:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they are gas planets because they have no surfaceShallom B Adepoju (talk)22:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
change them to 1 Ceres 134340 Pluto 136108 Haumea 136472 Makemake 136199 Eris 50000 Quaoar 225088 Gonggong 90482 Orcus and 90377 Sedna DO IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Shallom B Adepoju (talk)23:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive! You scored 38 points while adding citations to articles duringWikiProject Reliability's first{{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this minor barnstar. Thanks for helping out! |
Pichpich (talk)16:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy! I don't know if this falls within the "personal details" area of talk guidelines so my apologies if it does. If so, I will promptly remove this from the talk page. I hope this isn't too unprofessional to ask but do you happen to have a Telegram/Discord?Ornithoptera (talk)23:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya, read your work on Titan (moon) which is still a wip but doing good. I've added a couple of links to planetary.org content which I hope is ok
Lindyjanice1971 (talk)23:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of geological features on Triton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTupi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You did a really great job on theItalian cuisine page.JacktheBrown (talk)18:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk)13:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Nrco0e(talk •contribs)21:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ArkHyena, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!Sohom (talk)06:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On11 April 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the article269 Justitia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that269 Justitia is one of the reddest known asteroids in theasteroid belt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/269 Justitia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,269 Justitia), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk)00:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited4979 Otawara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesRetrograde andFlyby.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:58, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKordylewski cloud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCirrus.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited54509 YORP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJohn O'Keefe.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For example,special:diff/1318314744. Either version is considered correct, both versions are extremely common in English writing, and making this kind of minor change in a semi-automated fashion is disruptive. –jacobolus (t)07:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCapture of Triton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAlessandro Morbidelli.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited326732 Nice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pagePhotometry.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:58, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedMakemake for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Nrco0e(talk •contribs)00:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)22:09, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]