User talk:Anupam
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 Archives |
|---|
Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 and by February 2020 the new name was finally declared to be written everywhere on papers. Below are links to the decision:-1).https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .
Being a Indian resident, i would like to contribute to this new law which was passed by our government .
It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed.Here is the link for initial proposals made :-
(these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).
5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728 (This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )
But soon the final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020.The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-
6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042
Please help me by putting your vote in the paneldiscussion on the talk page section of Sector 13.
Here is an example on how to put your vote ___________.
Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put you vote by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end.Taal Saptak (talk)04:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
HelloAnupam! I see that you recently made anedit on Hindustani. I'd recommend you to go throughTalk:Hindustani language#topic of article where I and another user:Austronesier have discussed how important it is to mention the "context" when describing Hindustani which has been used in multiple senses.
So the earlier version where I had mentioned : "In modern context, Hindustani refers to the colloquial base ofHindi andUrdu" no longer exists. Since, you have made the edits. I'd like to inform that it would be better if the older version (of above mentioned line) is restored as it mentions the "context" which is highly vital to being accurate in the concerned article (see the talk page).
FromSattvic7 (talk)17:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, now I think my original idea was half-baked. I'm not asking you to change your support for it though.--Epiphyllumlover (talk)03:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKalash people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMahadev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam. Is this sentence in theKho people article:-The Kho people are likely descendants of those who arrived in the region during the Indo-Aryan migration
properly sourced? Since all I can view is a bunch of snippets[1]. -Fylindfotberserk (talk)10:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your edits onSpiritual practice.
It might be helpful in the future if you edit a section, then try the "Show Preview" button, then continuing editing until you are satisfied, and only then save it. This will appear as a single edit in the edit history instead of a long chain of edits -- which makes the history easier to follow.
This is just a suggestion; if there are reasons to make a series of separate edits, you are certainly entitled to do so. Regards --CleanCopytalk15:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromBritish Raj intoProtestantism in India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —Diannaa (talk)11:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedEvangelical theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNew Birth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DearAnupam, categorisation can be seen atCategory:Anglicanism. Linking to WikiProjects accordingly in categorised articles would probably be a good idea consequently. Please let me know if I can help you otherwise.PPEMES (talk)08:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Islamic Barnstar | |
| DearAnupam, I feel good to gift you The Islamic Barnstar award for your contributions toWP:Islam. More recently toMohammad Najeeb Qasmi andMuhammad Taqi Amini. You are making a difference on the Wikipedia. Best.Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)17:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
I have always appreciated your contributions forWP:ISLAM andWP:India. I am requesting you to copy-edit few of my articles likeYoda Press. Regards -Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)23:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your useful edit to the articleImmaculate Conception, and I hope you can understand why I made some edits to it. I do sincerely thank you though, because I was unable to find very much on the subject. You evidently know a lot about this, and I'm curious: what position does the Lutheran movement hold on the immaculate conception? Is it a "pious opinion"? Has it simply withered away?Achar Sva (talk)09:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Anupam, hoping that you are in best. Could you address the issue of copy edit in this article? Regards -Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)09:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Allhallowtide has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Halloween. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.PPEMES (talk)11:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the Barn Stars, they really mean a lot to me and I feel the zeal of writing more because I know that my work is being noticed. Thanks a lot.Jeromeenriquez (talk)08:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPaschal Triduum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMoravian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)12:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have sent me an alert about an email (perhaps with good advice for me), which I haven't received, although my address works for other messages. Best wishes, whether you are or are not one of the heroes on the front line.Bealtainemí (talk)18:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit | |
| Great work on Pakistan and other South Asian topics! Your contributions to Wikipedia are really appreciated. —Sagotreespirit (talk)09:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Anupam, i am ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist, please add that The Urdu is not a dialect of Western Hindi. It is true that the two languages are very similar and their speakers understand each other perfectly, but it is a mistake to consider Urdu as a dialect of Hindi, because in the same way Hindi can be considered as a dialect of Urdu. They are two independent languages but, Registers of Hindustani (Hindustani can the dialect of Western Hindi, if it's exclude Urdu, it's not important if Parental language Hindustani, is dialect of Western Hindi, so child language Urdu, should bee), Hindi and Urdu, both were divided as freed languages, Urdu for Muslims, and Hindi for Hindus.ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk)12:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Elizium23 (talk)18:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On1 May 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleComposite nationalism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatMahatma Gandhi championed the concept ofcomposite nationalism, which led to a massive expansion of theIndian independence movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Composite nationalism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Composite nationalism), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
Vanamonde (Talk)00:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I read your linkhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle - Fowler&fowler's reversal (with no consultation) of 6 months worth of edits from about 20 different users does not seem consistent with that guideline. I want to reinstate the changes Fowler&fowler rolled back as a matter of urgency. Firstly because i think a reversion that dramatic is destructive vandalism. And also so i can try to improve the most recent version so there is something optimal to discuss. Fowler&fowler repeated the reversion while i was working on the article, so the version immediately before that is not the best to discuss.Irtapil (talk)05:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had left it a bit messy for a few days because i got interrupted, so the version immediately preceding the destructive edit is not the best to discuss. I want to try to improve what was there, but they did it again while i was in the process of working on the page. I know edit wars are very much frowned upon but i'm not sure what the right way to deal with this is.Irtapil (talk)06:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello Anupam. You are invited to join the newWikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello, Anupam. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Financial wellness".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!JMHamo (talk)09:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onPashtuns; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.
Discuss in talk please.Casperti (talk)21:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest inIndia,Pakistan, andAfghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Barkeep49 (talk)22:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam. I have partially written an article onPathans in India. It is not entirely complete. Feel free to contribute to it if you ever have the time and good sources. Cheers,Mar4d (talk)19:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.— Precedingunsigned comment added byCasperti (talk •contribs)21:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear, i dont know why i have been blocked from creating articles on wikipedia. please see into it and help. Thank you.--Jeromeenriquez (talk)06:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On17 June 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleAll India Conference of Indian Christians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theAll India Conference of Indian Christians wasopposed to the partition of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/All India Conference of Indian Christians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,All India Conference of Indian Christians), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Maile (talk)12:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I want to earn Star . How to get that ?Ignostar (talk)11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On21 July 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleAll India Anglo-Indian Association, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theAll India Anglo-Indian Association maintains thatAnglo-Indians are unique because they are Christians and have historical links to both Europe and India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/All India Anglo-Indian Association. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,All India Anglo-Indian Association), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
—valereee (talk)00:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thanks for all your sweet contributions to 'pedia like this brownie! Just keep it up dear ;-)He@ven's Queent@lk15:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Your recent editing history atKanye West 2020 presidential campaign shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Nice4What (talk ·contribs) –(Thanks♥)01:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed your insinuation of this term into the Joe Biden article. It is UNDUE and it's not a term much used in the USA. I hope you are not thinking this tag should be applied to a wide range of American public figures. It's not a mainstream view that this label applies to American Politics or public discourse. SPECIFICOtalk18:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
SPECIFICOtalk18:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
well i read some of your articles it was nice, KEEP IT UP. i having nothing to give but still i liked some of your articles (contribution).UMAGPR (talk)16:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
i will surely ask if i have any doubt, thank you so much for leaving a message in my talk page.i am just a new user,thank you.
thanks for your welcome cookie.😁👌regardsUMAGPR (talk)18:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Peace Barnstar | |
| amazing.UMAGPR (talk)06:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Your submission ofTemplate:Did you know nominations/Direction of prayer at theDid You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described instep 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with{{db-g7}}, or ask aDYK admin. Thank you.DYKHousekeepingBot (talk)13:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me out to edit thisUser:UMAGPR/St.Mary's Church Gulmarg, Kashmir article to publish, I need your help to Edit, Insert and publish this article. regardsUMAGPR (talk)04:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission ofDirection of prayer at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Yoninah (talk)01:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you consider some of the recent issues likethis one "contentious"? The "so he cannot win the presidential election" violatesWP:SYNTH, since the source does not say that, but otherwise I'm not sure what the problem is with that edit.OhNoitsJamieTalk19:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On23 August 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleFixed prayer times, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that Christians belonging to theOriental Orthodox Churches pray at sevenfixed prayer times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Fixed prayer times. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Fixed prayer times), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Maile (talk)00:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, i see that you mentionedW28394 here [[2]] due to his disruptive editing. He clearly hasn't learnt anything as he did revert the changes again here [[3]]. I have mentioned him here [[4]] as he is doing the same for the following two articles.Jalal-ud-din Khalji andKhalji dynastyKami2018 (talk)18:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi sir, i have reverted the change to one of the article which this user was reverting without providing any evidence. I have opened up a discussion on the talk page for [[5]]. Please feel free to contribute as i am sure this user will revert this change either today or tomorrow and i cant seem to get attention from the moderators.Kami2018 (talk)04:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sir,Good afternoon,I have noticed your hard work on creating theShehimo breviary page which inspired me to create a page for the LRD ministry team and list all current publications, future projects and etc.I kindly request you to help me in writing this article page and pull together any personal assets or resources so that this page will be approved and help others find valuable information on the Indian Orthodox Prayers.
Sincerely yours,Zmalluzboyz (talk)16:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ministry_of_Liturgical_Resource_Development
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBettani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBhatti.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good Evening, unfortunately, I have to write on your talk page due to the petty targeting, complaining, and accusations initiated against me byKami2018.
I have been accused of edit wars, disruptive editing, etc, for making factual and well sourced changes to articles. I have provided all required sources for every change I have made. You can find the reasoning and sources for them on the talk pages here [[6]],here [[7]] and here, [[8]].
Rather than engaging and replying on the talk pages,Kami2018 has resorted to flippant behavior and is trying to get me banned by various editors/moderators.Kami2018 has been obtrusively imposing his views on to others and has been warned against doing so by various users numerous times in the past as well. I will not be engaging with him any further as he has time and again showed he is not one to be reasoned with. Thank you.
W28394 (talk)18:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time out to reply. Regarding consensus on the Hindkowan article, I would like to mention a couple of things before I get to whether it needs to be reverted to the previous version.
1) I had first edited that article on the 8th of March. For 5 whole months, nobody had a major problem with the edits on the article.
2) On 7th of August, I edited the Khalji article, whichKami2018 had already edited before.
3) On 9th of August,Kami2018 reverted my edits on the Khalji article.
4) On 10th of August,Kami2018 reverted my edits on the Hindkowan article, keep in mind he had nothing to do with that article prior to me editing the Khalji article. This only leads one to believe that me editing the Khalji article he was maintaining did not sit well with him for which he reverted the only page I had a big hand in editing.
5) Ever since, he has been senselessly accusing me of vandalism and edit wars when to be honest, the timeline of edit histories say otherwise. Rather than engaging on the talkpage and answering/countering genuine facts and reasoning, he has been trying to get me banned from wiki. Which I believe is petty and childlike and will amount to nothing more than this back and forth exchange.
Having said that, lets move on to the Hindkowan article and the changes I made to it.
1) I removed sources stating that "Other Hindko-speakers, mostly of the Hindu and Sikh faiths, have been living in Afghanistan for centuries and are known as Hindki". This is because it was not mentioned in the source provided.
2) I removed the Punjabi language tags and the Punjabi fonts because beginning with the 1981 census, speakers of Saraiki and Hindko were no longer included in the total numbers for Punjabis. Pakistan is where perhaps over 99% of the Hindkowans live and they have been classified as a distinct group of people, independent of the Punjabis and thus the Punjabi language font and tags are not required in this article. Once again, all this is well sourced information.
3) I had to remove a bunch of sources from the article, mostly because they dated from the British Raj era. The issue of whether of not such sources are reliableWikipedia:RS has been tested time and again at all sorts of venues, includingWikipedia:RSN. The consensus has for many years been that they arenot and, as such, we should not use them.
4) I had to remove countries from "regions with significant population" as the Hindkowan population in those countries was quite clearly, not 'significant' enough and amounting to only a couple hundred people (compared to 5 million in Pakistab).
4) Other than removing the above mentioned contents of the page, I also added more information to the article. All of this was well sourced and well structured.
5) Due to this, the page remained relatively inactive edit wise for 5 months beforeKami2018 reverted everything, and took the article back to its out of date, poorly sourced, poorly structured version.
According to wiki, "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus." As mentioned above, my edits were pretty much unchanged for 5 months and thus we can assume that it by and large had the consensus of editors who came across it from March 8 to August 10 (when the user mentioned above reverted all my edits for reasons I am pretty sure we know)
Therefore, I think it goes against common sense reverting from a well sourced well structured article to a poorly sourced poorly structured article. A consensus should not be required and would have been required if the article was an essay based on opinions and not when it is an article about a demography backed with well sourced facts. As wiki says," Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution "violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Common sense doesn't need to be a policy; as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy."
W28394 (talk)22:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
HiUser:Anupam,W28394 has again started behaving in the same manner as he was acting before. He is just pushing his propaganda on pages below and i would like to bring this to your notice. Changes reverted [[9]][[10]][[11]]Kami2018 (talk)01:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kami2018, Kindly go through the talk page of the article and see that we have already discussed the changes made over a month ago and agreed to them.W28394 (talk)14:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Dear Sir, Many thanks for your kind words and barnstar gifts towards me. Here is a token of my appreciation towards you and your work here. Sincerely yours,Zmalluzboyz (talk)05:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi. I think the user kami is wrong (both on contributes and consensus). First the "majority" of users in Khalji talk page have consensus, and that's for the edits. (You can see it for yourself). Secondly the user w28394 have merely fixed the loop holes (which were obvious) on the article. I think as a positive contributor you should do the right thing and back him up. (At least on khalji page), Thank you.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F (talk)13:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly my point2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F. Why are my edits being reverted to a poorly sourced version on the Hindkowan article over lack of consensus whereas no such action is being taken on the Khalji Dynasty article? Various editors disputeKami2018s edits on the Khalji Dynasty article. Editors84.211.3.220,Hayras123,Khestwol,Akmal94,FawadAliKhan11 are only some users who have not given consensus on that article yetKami2018 has been editing the page and POV pushing the article without any repercussions.
W28394 (talk)23:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTobacco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBook of Discipline.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have started a discussion on the talk page of the article and shall wait for the counter argument against my edits. I shall revert it if nobody replies to the discussion. In the mean time, I would like to discuss the fact that while my edits are being reverted to a poorly sourced version on the Hindkowan article over lack of consensus, no such action is being taken on the Khalji Dynasty article. Various editors disputeKami2018s edits on the Khalji Dynasty article. Editors .Hayras123,Khestwol,Akmal94,FawadAliKhan11.84.211.3.220,2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F are only some users who have not given consensus on that article yetKami2018 has been editing the page and POV pushing the article without any repercussions.
W28394 (talk)00:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@User:AnupamClearlyW28394 is not stopping from reverting articles and it is clear from his reverts here [[12]]. I have restored the version as supported by the talk page.Kami2018 (talk)04:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The others on the talk page have been discussing the same issues I have been discussing. I have not received a reply on the talk page countering the edits byKami2018. I believe you are saying that when you tag multiple users its not canvassing but when I do it is considered canvassing for some odd reason. That is interesting to say the least. I believe you adhere to the warning as well since you initiated it.
W28394 (talk)00:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On6 September 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleDirection of prayer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that Jewish homes in theDiaspora often feature amizrah wall hanging(example pictured) to indicate thedirection of prayer towards Jerusalem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Direction of prayer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Direction of prayer), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Maile (talk)12:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have you seenthis edit. This guy looks like a POV pusher to me. He recently removed the mention of Hinduism fromthis article. -Fylindfotberserk (talk)18:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Pakistan Star | |
| Great work on Pakistan related articles! You do fantastic work.Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)23:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Connected contributor (paid) has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Paid article. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);Talk to Andy;Andy's edits17:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSyed Moiz Balkhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Moiz Balkhi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.TryKid [dubious –discuss]00:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedWeek of Prayer for Christian Unity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMennonite Church.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)12:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thanks for maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. You are owed a million thanks!Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)16:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
 | The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks again for your help on South Asian languages. Owe you big.Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)03:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Your recent editing history atAbraham shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Having had your suggested edit reverted twice, your next step is to go to the Talk page and explain why you feel the changes you wish to introduce would improve the article.Achar Sva (talk)21:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedHindu Raj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCavendish.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I received an e-mail message from you, asking me if I mind that you send me some information. I don't mind, but be sure to only send me information that is personal or otherwise sensitive. If it is not sensitive or personal, you can send it here.Vanjagenije(talk)19:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Happy Diwali!!! | |
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and ProsperousDiwali.
|
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can you explain why you changed multipleredirects for theValmiki caste to redirect toChuhra? A lot of castes in India are known as Valmiki/Balmiki not limited to the Chuhra of Punjab. Your redirect changes are not only confusing/compounding the two but also likely created misdirects. I will be reverting these edits unless you have something significant to add.Gotitbro (talk)01:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam, this book has a nice section on Sindh which I think you might enjoy looking at:
Cheers,Kautilya3 (talk)02:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSuperstitions in Muslim societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstitions in Muslim societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Bookku (talk)05:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| The Islamic Barnstar | |
| Great work on Islam related articles. You did excellent work onDeobandi related articles.Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)05:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
On3 December 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleBettiah Christians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that thelehenga was the traditional dress of women belonging to theBettiah Christian ethnoreligious community of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Bettiah Christians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Bettiah Christians), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk)00:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Hinduism Award | |
| You are the rare one that people have always imagined about. I saw your edits and page creations and I must say I am really impressed especially withJwala Ji Temple creation. Keep up your Wikipedia passion on Hinduism articles!LearnIndology (talk)18:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
 | The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for protecting this project! Greatly appreciated.Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)00:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Your submission ofJohn Montgomery Cooper at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Yoninah (talk)00:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
Hello Anupam, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hello! Wishing you aMerry Christmas and a prosperous2021 on the behalf ofChristmas task force ofWikiProject Holidays.
Happy holidays!
You can do!
| Recent...
|
 | _(5247428631).jpg) |  |
Quotations related toCalvin Coolidge at Wikiquote--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission ofTorwali people at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!SL93 (talk)19:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I would appreciate it if you stopped edit warring atMalakand District andHistory of Malakand. First, predatory journals should not be used – I don't think this would ever be negotiable. Second, it's not up to me to gain consensus for removing unsourced text; theWP:BURDEN is no you to provide sources for this text. Thanks. –Uanfala (talk)00:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Moved fromUser talk:UanfalaGreetings User:Uanfala, actually the articles you mention included the information prior to me even touching them. I simply improved the sourcing and now have even supplanted the reference you found to be inadequate. PerWP:BRD, it is now up to you to gain consensus for the removal of the reliably sourced information. I will continue to revert you if you edit war against the status-quo version. I hope this helps. With regards,AnupamTalk00:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Replying toyour question: I found that article from your contribs. I haven't look at any other articles there. –Uanfala (talk)23:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Happy holidays! Wishing you and your family a wonderful Xmas!Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)17:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
 | The Writer's Barnstar |
| Great work on creating the article onTorwali people. I learned so much about my region. Thank you!Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk)00:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi! You recently added some information toHindu Raj, includingThe Hindu Raj mountain range runs between Chitral and Gilgit; they are located south of theCavendish.Cavendish links to a disambiguation page, and none of the entries on that page have anything to do with Pakistan or the wider region. Neither can I find anything online. What is 'the Cavendish'?Lennart97 (talk)00:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Buddhism Barnstar | |
| You are without any doubt the rare one. Saw your edits related to Buddhism, and I must say, you publish quality content, such asShanti Stupa. I am looking forward to collaborate with you on topics related to Buddhism. :)LearnIndology (talk)15:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Alexbrn (talk)20:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anupam reported by User:Kautilya3 (Result: ). Thank you.Kautilya3 (talk)01:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Anupam,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk)07:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAmy Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChristian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On6 January 2021,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleShanti Stupa, Delhi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatShanti Stupa, Delhi, was inaugurated bythe Dalai Lama in 2007? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Shanti Stupa, Delhi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Shanti Stupa, Delhi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk)12:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On10 January 2021,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleJohn Montgomery Cooper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatJohn Montgomery Cooper advanced the theory that both South American and North American Indians were "marginal peoples" who were cultural relics from prehistoric times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/John Montgomery Cooper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,John Montgomery Cooper), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk)00:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Today you reverted this change:[14] Do you have a reason for this reversion? No consensus is required for a change like this, particularly if you provide no reason for your objection.:bloodofox: (talk)03:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFeast of Christ the King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChristian Reformed Church.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Anupam,
Wanted to notify you that you are part of this dispute resolution in this noticeboard:
--Casperti (talk)18:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| Great work in cleaning up all those articles.Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk)02:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFlame (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChurch History.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have started a discussion on changing the word "Gandhara" to "East Afghanistan" in reference to Pashtun history in the Pre-Islamic Period[16]
I hope you can contribute to this with your insightsPashtoPromoter (talk)07:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're specially invited to join theWikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.
The collaboration will help promote many articles to thegood andfeatured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see themain page of the collaboration.
Sign up for this collaboration bylisting your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.
You can discuss this newsletterhere.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself fromthe mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of allmassmessage mailings, you may addCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.Sent byHulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf ofWikiProject India. Thank you!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 |
Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see alsoWikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk)16:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
direction of prayer
Thank you for quality articles around spirituality in India and Pakistan, such asComposite nationalism,All India Conference of Indian Christians andDirection of prayer, for fighting vandalism, for promoting cure by peace and kindness, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no.2566 of Precious, a prize ofQAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk)11:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the Psalms: I am not convinced that splitting Protestant in Lutheran and Nonconformist is a good idea, - could we please discuss that? First we just said Jewish, Catholic and Protestant. Then came someone saying Anglican needs extra, can't be taken as part of Protestant. Now you try another split, but what then about Reformed, United, etc.?? - If usage isdifferent for a certain Protestant group, that could be mentioned in the body, but the sentence in the lead is rather meant as emphasis for a quite broad ecumenical aspect. --Gerda Arendt (talk)16:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Thank you for all the editing you have done onCovenant Renewal Service. However, one point that you have added has me puzzled: the claim that Covenant Renewal is held at watchnight services. I have never encountered any report of that being done. Can you give more information, please, e.g. where and when this has happened? So far as I can discover, Covenant and Watchnight traditions are entirely independent. Thanks.seglea (talk)17:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your speedy reply. After I'd left the message above it occurred to me to try the UMC site, and I found the article you cite. It's odd that tradition developed in the UMC, because so far as I know (and I've checked with some historians) it has never been so in British or British-derived Methodism, where the tradition of holding Covenant services is much stronger - they are almost always on the first Sunday of the year. Watchnight services are now virtually extinct in the UK anyway, but even when they were common they were never that I know of linked with Covenant - though it might have happened in some parts of the country, or in some of the non-Wesleyan Methodist churches that existed before British Methodist union in 1933. I will adjust the page to make it clear that there are geographic differences here.seglea (talk)19:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolga Tanriseven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)11:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| The Special Barnstar |
| You have certainly earned my respect by your recent activities on Wikipedia. Tolerance and coexistence are the messages I am picking up from you. Your participation is much appreciated!Ngrewal1 (talk)14:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam
Your move
19:19, 25 May 2021 Anupam talk contribs block 102 bytes +102 Anupam moved page Caste system among Christians to Caste system among South Asian Christians
seems to me to be out of process. I suggest you revert it immediately. If the move is to be contested it should go tomove review.Andrewa (talk)20:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SeeTalk:Caste system among South Asian Christians#Issue with the above for discussion of this, which seems to me to belong here not there.
Just to repeat and clarify, there was no justification for this bold reverting of a closed and actioned move. If you think you lack the required authority to revert this error of yours, seeWP:RM#TM.Andrewa (talk)21:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Did you attempt to revert the move beforeraising the technical move request, as suggested both by myself and the process described there? What was the result?Andrewa (talk)22:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me in getting this Draft Published. The subject is a professional football coach from india.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_MahmoodDar zubair07:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSabbath in Christianity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRichard Watson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onSoan Meeraas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of thecriteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Yeeno (talk)🍁18:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
HelloAnupam! I see that you recently made an edit onPrevenient grace and notice your interest forMethodism. This is just to invite you to browse thearminianism projet pages in order to be more aquainted with it and why not, be a participant.--Telikalive (talk)08:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| You are cordially invited to participate inWikiProject Arminianism The goal of WikiProject Arminianism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Arminianism available on Wikipedia.WP:WikiProject Arminianism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Arminian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |  |
 |
... for what you said onUser talk:SlimVirgin -missing pictured on my talk, with music full of hope and reformation --Gerda Arendt (talk)19:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Anupam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Screencast-O-Matic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)17:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedProfessional sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBritain.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Abstinence pledge card.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Ixfd64 (talk)00:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atEvangelical theology shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
--ServB1 (talk)02:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedEternal sin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThomas Nelson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The articleMusafir (band) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:NBAND
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.KH-1 (talk)01:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Masih (surname)—has beenproposed formerging with another article. If you are interested, please participate inthe merger discussion. Thank you.☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉)07:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedChristian Flag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDiocese of Fort Worth.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! The redirectHuman arts has been nominated for deletion. –Uanfala (talk)00:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam,we've met in various articles on liturgy etc, and I value your considerate attitude. May I draw your attention on the User Lucifernam, whose statement "Hello from hell" is obviously his programme, for example here[17] and here[18]. As he or she seems to be a very busy bee this complete loss of composure might happen rather often. As I'm rather new: what should one do with such users? Thank you for your attention.--Medusahead (talk)11:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Greetings,
Requesting your visit toDraft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find you interest in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk)16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Lang-hin has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Trappist the monk (talk)13:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 | Season's Greetings | |
| Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022Fowler&fowler«Talk»21:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectChristian - Catholic and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Christian - Catholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Veverve (talk)01:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectJanga Gana Mana and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Janga Gana Mana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.---CX Zoom(he/him)(let's talk|contribs)22:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I left a note in my edit thatViktorija Faith was not selected for Lithuania, as noted on the page itself and onLithuania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022. I'm unsure where the confusion lies as the Eurovision categories only have selected artists, not national final artists. Since the first line of the page even notes that she did not win the national selection, I don't see the reason to have a discussion about it rather than just removing the incorrect categories.2600:8801:AC00:9C9:400E:6B:6A5F:E184 (talk)21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.El_C09:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam! I did add changes that are correct to the Jal Shah page. (I am her daughter) I did leave an explanation but I believe that it didn't save. But in summary, I changed incorrect info/made it more detailed and accurate. Thanks!— Precedingunsigned comment added by2601:681:4180:27C0:0:0:0:46CF (talk)02:38, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Anupam! I did add changes that are correct to the Jal Shah page. (I am her daughter) I did leave an explanation but I believe that it didn't save. But in summary, I changed incorrect info/made it more detailed and accurate. Thanks!— Precedingunsigned comment added by2601:681:4180:27C0:0:0:0:46CF (talk)02:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On19 February 2022,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleDerasar, Rajasthan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the residents ofDerasar collect rainwater intaankas since the village experiences eleven months of drought a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Derasar, Rajasthan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Derasar, Rajasthan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk)00:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedKnights Templar for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meetsfeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Hog FarmTalk04:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedOutward holiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCalvary Holiness Church.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PLEASE STOP DISTRUPTIVE EDITS AND HIJACKING WESLEYAN THEOLOGY PAGE YOU HAVE HEAVILY EDITED THE PAGE WITH FALSE PERCEPTIONS— Precedingunsigned comment added by116.75.125.69 (talk)17:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectOpposition to the legalisation of drugs and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Opposition to the legalisation of drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Sangdeboeuf (talk)06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectOpposition to the legalization of drugs and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Opposition to the legalization of drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Sangdeboeuf (talk)06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you have made a nice improvement to several articles about Anabaptism. I made a couple of minor tweaks, such as Hutterites not practicing footwashing. But you have certainly upgraded them overall. Thanks!Mikeatnip (talk)13:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The fileFile:Screencast-O-Matic icon.png has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded forScreencast-O-Matic. No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦»07:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 | The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk)07:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk)07:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
| The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over100 article reviews during 2018. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk)03:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, butNPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk)03:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectSausage digits and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 3#Sausage digits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.QueenofBithynia (talk)14:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectFundamentalist Atheist and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15 § Fundamentalist Atheist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Steel1943 (talk)21:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avadhnama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk !18:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.I am not sure if you know it, but you can link a category on WCommons to its Wikipedia article. It helps keeping things tidy. For example, with an image you uploaded an did not put into a category :
Veverve (talk)05:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mechanical Plastics Corp. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me!02:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sir/Madam,
I respectfully request your assistance in reviewing my draft article,Draft:Mughal Khel. As a sub-tribe of the Yousafzai, the Mughal Khels are unique in that they are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in Southern Pakhtunkhwa, where they speak a soft version of Pashto. They are based in Bannu and their history and cultural practices have been documented in various online sources and books.
It is my hope that by writing this article, I can contribute to the knowledge base about the Yousafzai tribe and highlight their rich tradition of migration and cultural diversity. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and support in ensuring that the information is accurate and suitable for submission on Wikipedia.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,18:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Isparki— Precedingunsigned comment added byIsparki (talk •contribs)
This one seems like a sock ofthis banned user, considering how hellbent they were trying to remove the same content[19], as IP[20],[21],[22],[23][24].@Aman.kumar.goel,LearnIndology, andGotitbro:.-117.201.112.141 (talk)12:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Outlook (mobile app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
SeanJ 2007 (talk)02:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onLaicization (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)17:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageChristian nationalism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)04:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectChristian - Anglican has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22 § Christian - Anglican until a consensus is reached.Veverve (talk)04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectChristian - Epsicopalian has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22 § Christian - Epsicopalian until a consensus is reached.Veverve (talk)04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:Methodist canonical hours.jpg.
This image is aderivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine thelicense and thesource of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add acopyright tag to theimage description page.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at themedia copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука1306:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Qwerfjkltalk09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I started a discussion on the Britannica source which mentions that the Waldensians eventually came to reject transubstantiation on the talkpage. As you deleted the reference, I would like to hear why do you think that Britannica is not a reliable source in this regard? --ValtteriLahti12 (talk)15:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A long time agoyou editedChristmas tree. You had seen there was a separate article forChrismon tree. You swapped a{{anchor| for a{{main| . However, you had not checked for any possible references to#chrismon tree. By removing the anchor, you broke linking, included from inside the same article (check gallery at end of#Artificial_trees)
An 'anchor' is the destination of a link - *explicitly* created by someone - and just destroying the anchor without finding every use of that link destination is "not a good" thing.
I'll go fix the two broken usages that I know about. Maybe you could look for more?Shenme (talk)06:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Anupam ! Appreciate your commitment to maintaining and improving Wikipedia! Your dedication to enhancing this invaluable source of global knowledge is truly commendable. Thanks for your tireless contributions to its continuous growth and refinement.! Wishing you and your family aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year!
RV (talk)05:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
| Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Anupam, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The Herald (Benison) (talk)08:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I want you to moveSC de Goa,SC Bengaluru andMohammedan as it has been seven days since I proposedrequested move. Thanks!– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™🗿03:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleLTBF (disambiguation) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing theprimary topic and only one other topic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk)03:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Church of Bangladesh is now the anglican church, go to website then write something. And also our all bishops are anglican, we're anglican and you writing united protestant that is not justified. PleaseAnupam go to website . There is no mark for united protestant otherwise we the members of the Anglican church will complain against you. Please anupam go to their website because iam a member of thet church123.253.214.143 (talk)02:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMahal family, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)03:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look atthese unsourced changes and as well asother disruption by the IP with false edit summaries. Thanks. -Fylindfotberserk (talk)19:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fileFile:Our Lady of Graces.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Derivative work. Wrong license.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Sreejith K (talk)13:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedChurch of God (Restoration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChurch of God.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedWesleyan theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIndependent Methodist.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of Christian denominations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAlexander Campbell.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)18:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:Cord of Saint Philomena.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on itscopyright andlicensing status. Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing theimage description page. You may refer to theimage use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page oncopyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here isa list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedEvangelical Wesleyan Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNorthville, NY.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in thefrontispiece inJuliana Horatia Ewing'sMary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated byMary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Anupam: Enjoy theholiday season andwinter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers,Abishe (talk)13:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
%2c_cropped.jpg)
Abishe (talk)13:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Hello, with whom can we reach a consensus? Is there anyone who disagrees? The source is also available. The problem has been resolved, unless you disagree."
.تیران (talk)18:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, This is to let you know thatone of your recent edit atApostolic succession caused a citation error.
Do not add invalid url and use preview before saving your edit. Happy editing.––kemel49(connect)(contri)16:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you are still interested inWikiProject Christianity.Please respond to this within a week if you are still interested in helping out. If you do not respond within a week you will be classified as inactive on the WikiProject member list.Sheriff U3 |Talk |Con22:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | A Special Edition of ICHTHUS |  Special Edition | |||
Project Resurrection!
ByFarmerUpbeat
WikiProject Christianity is being revitalized! After an initiative led bySheriff U3 to categorize participants as active or inactive, as well as organizing roles for those who are active, WP:X members are hopeful for the future of the project as we move into a new era. Any questions about this may be directed toSheriff U3 as we move into this new era of the WikiProject!
WikiProject memberFarmerUpbeat has been selected as the new newsletter editor, and greets the readers ofIchthus with benedictions.
This has been a special edition ofIchthus, official newsletter of WikiProject:Christianity. Afull edition will come in April, stay tuned!
Scripture Verse
Restore us, O LORD God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved.
— Psalm 80:19, NRSVue
Help wanted!
We're looking for writers to contribute toIchthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submissionhere.
 | Thanks for your edits on Lent and other topicsBenedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk)17:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Sir, please help me in savingMirzapuri article. I have given so many reference still got a deletion tag. Hope you help me. Shubh Prabhat.Blaada (talk)03:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
stfu, i have already provided the source. and don't fcking add that ugly picRyanRai11 (talk)13:16, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atSynergism shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
AnupamTalk 02:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Dr.Decapod (talk)04:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDays of humiliation and thanksgiving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDaniel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedReal presence of Christ in the Eucharist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageReformed.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HelloAnupam I disagree with your edits concerning Synergism, Monergism, and Prevenient Grace. Specifically, you are linking prevenient grace and sanctification within Lutheran theology, but the sources you cite do not reflect the positions of recent, broadly recognized Lutheran theologians.
A key theological issue that appears to be overlooked is the precise meaning of synergism. Within a truly monergistic framework, genuine synergism—in the sense of humans being the ultimate or decisive cause of their actions—is not possible. When Lutheran or Reformed theologians speak of synergism, they typically mean that the human person is not inactive, but they do not affirm true synergism as classically defined.
Even within the Reformed tradition, some theologians—such as R.C. Sproul and Louis Berkhof—refer to a form of "synergism" in the context of conversion or sanctification. However, these claims are arguably self-contradictory when considered within a system of exhaustive divine monergism, and they are therefore not universally accepted among Reformed theologians.
Similarly, in Lutheran theology—which affirms soteriological monergism—some Lutheran theologians describe a kind of synergism in sanctification and, in some cases, even in conversion. Yet in light of the broader theological framework, this should not be understood as strict synergism in the classical sense, but rather as an affirmation of human non-inactivity in the process.
Therefore, I suggest that you revert your edits, as you have not adequately explained—through sourcing—that the claims you are presenting are non-consensual.---Telikalive (talk)21:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦Dr. Blofeld14:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHindustani kinship terms, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.
The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindustani kinship terms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HelloUser:Anupam. I noticed you have been editingTemplate:Baptist without first gainingconsensus in thetalk page. Previously, the "Background" list included "Puritanism" in its listing, and was accepted by the editors. The same way I say unto you: to resolve the content dispute, please do notrevert or change the edits of others when you are reverted - mainly for such reason. Thank you!Heidon (talk)22:24, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
