Thanks for uploadingImage:Björk - Album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions atWikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk)07:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onBowel of Chiley requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be arepost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template{{hangon}}underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page'sdiscussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please usedeletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.SummerPhD (talk)18:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aproposed deletion template has been added to the articleGoddammit I Love America!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Demos are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:MUSIC.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia'scriteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" andWikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or onits talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through theproposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of thespeedy deletion criteria or it can be sent toArticles for Deletion, where it may be deleted ifconsensus to delete is reached.SummerPhD (talk)18:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,Goddammit I Love America!, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goddammit I Love America!. Thank you.SummerPhD (talk)19:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aproposed deletion template has been added to the articleOU818, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Demos are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:MUSIC.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia'scriteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" andWikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or onits talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through theproposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of thespeedy deletion criteria or it can be sent toArticles for Deletion, where it may be deleted ifconsensus to delete is reached.SummerPhD (talk)18:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed deletion is still in place onOU818. If you intend to dispute this deletion as well, please remove the template on that article. Thanks. -SummerPhD (talk)19:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Bowel of Chiley.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)01:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:ISELECT.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)01:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Bowel of Chiley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriatecopyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice byOrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions.07:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Footnotes" is an acceptable name for the section containing references, please seeWikipedia:LAYOUT#Notes_or_References, which means thatthis edit was unnecessary. --JD554 (talk)14:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it would be better if the notes section used the </references> instead of the{{Reflist}} template. That way a "group name" can be used to keep them separate from any footnotes that may get added, seeWP:REFNOTE. --JD554 (talk)08:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it for you[1] --JD554 (talk)10:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These reviews and links should not be submitted on mass. It is definitelyConflict of Interest as the person who added these links is essentially using Wikipedia as pr to attain exposure. If it was an occasional well written review added by someone who is interested in anything other than strangeglue.com then that would be acceptable. Please understand I have a third party interest in some of these articles, and I also occasionally add reviews - but without any COI. Hope that helps. (Snoop God (talk)14:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

You said "Well then fix the redirect instead of having that article which may be confusing for some users"[2], which is exactly what I've been trying to do. BecauseRiceboy Sleeps has already been redirected once toJónsi & Alex,Riceboy Sleeps (album) cannot be moved to it even though the redirect has been changed to the album article. It needs an admin to speedily delete the redirect page so the album page can be moved there. I will then place aWP:HATNOTE at the top of the album article which will say "This article is about the album, for the artists formerly known as Riceboy Sleeps, seeJónsi & Alex." Please don't remove the delete request again otherwise we won't be able to have theprimary topic in the right place. Thanks, --JD554 (talk)06:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed the self-published source again because it is hosted on a personal website, please readWP:SPS. Also, as a jpg, the letter could have been created by any graphic editing program and then claimed to be from Sigur Ros. A source that complies withWP:RS andWP:SPS is needed. --JD554 (talk)08:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:BennJordanPaleBlueDot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under theCC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (seethis list)at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication topermissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letterhere.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk)12:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Niklas angående Niklas" was the working title for the album, andnot the final title. musicbrainz.org, discogs.com etc are not reliable sources for this.Nymf_hideliho!17:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but MusicBrainz and Discogs (specially the former; Discogs takes titles too literally which can sometimes be wrong; now, for example it's useful: it proves (Niklas... was on the physical album) are the most reliable music databases on the web. Yes, even more than official sites, which frequently make mistakes. If Niklas angående Niklas was just the working title and not present on the album's packaging, I can assure you it wouldn't be on those sites.≤^alvareo[speak to me]≥19:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See that lil' button called "edit" on both of those pages. It means that any users can change the content, and as such, just like IMDB and Wikipedia, for instance, it cannot be considered a reliable source. Feel free to tell me where it says "Niklas angående Niklas" on the album.Front,CD,BackNymf_hideliho!20:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though there's a "lil' button called "edit"", people who are subscribed to the artist are quick to fix mistakes.Anyway, there's no mention of what you say is the working title on the packaging, so I guess you're in the right. Thank you for the scans, though; I'm going to upload them to Discogs.≤^alvareo[speak to me]≥ 21:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC) Could you take a picture of the CD's spine?≤^alvareo[speak to me]≥21:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe I forgot to say this: After people press that lil' button and modify the information, other users' votes are required. In MusicBrainz, for example, an edit requires three "yes" votes to be accepted, and if those don't happen within two weeks (or if there were no "no" votes), the edit is accepted. People who are subscribed to the artist get notified of such edits and go vote on them. As you may think, Shiningwasn't one of those artists that didn't receive "no" votes (or less than three "yes" votes) and had to be accepted two weeks later. I'm not familiar with Discogs policies, but I do know they're not accepted automatically.≤^alvareo[speak to me]≥19:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find that per previous discussions,here andhere it was concluded thatThe Fame Monster is Gaga's third EP and second album. Note that EPs can be either singles or albums. --Lil_℧niquℇ№1^[talk]16:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, how is something an album and an EP at the same time?≤^alvareo[speak to me]≥18:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleFriendship Is Magic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friendship Is Magic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Beerest355Talk17:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toMulti Viral may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)17:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alvareo. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alvareo. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alvareo. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alvareo. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of ACE messages