User talk:Aliyiya5903
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for creating2024 Sambhal Violence. Cheers!Baqi:) (talk)12:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
 | Thanks for creatingShahi Masjid Prayagraj, Enjoy the strawberries. Regards.Taabii (talk)17:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Try clicking on the all-caps links before reinstating your edits. As explained onWP:NOTFORUM, article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the articles, not for posting political screeds and pet conspiracy theories related to the subject of the article.TryKid [dubious –discuss]03:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aliya,
Your “Extended-confirmed-protected edit request” is not following the template. You have to clearly mention that what informations you want to change. For example - please changeX to Y. According to the template -
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptableand will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y
-Cerium4B •Talk? •19:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aliyiya5903! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is theprohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, including discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition isbroadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you mayrequest a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or atthis page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with ourneutral point of view andreliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies onbiographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you beingblocked from editing.As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!TheKip(contribs)18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Traumnovelle (talk)20:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2024 Magdeburg car attack andTaleb Al-AbdulmohsenTheofunny (talk)20:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed your edits as they present unverified claims and speculation, which do not meet Wikipedia’s standards for reliable sourcing and neutrality. While the information comes from individuals who have been in direct contact with Taleb, these statements still require independent verification from reliable sources to be included in the article. Wikipedia is not a platform for unsubstantiated allegations, and all content must be backed by verifiable, credible sources.Aliyiya5903 (talk)09:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mDrat8sub. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have aneutral point of view. Your recent edit to2025 Pahalgam attack seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you. Kindly explain, these repeated edits1,2. You are on the verge of edit war. Kindly, go through wikipedia guidelines.Drat8sub (talk)18:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at2025 Pahalgam attack shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Firefangledfeathers (talk /contribs)14:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to2025 India–Pakistan strikes, did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please useyour sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Linkin Prankster (talk)05:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at2025 India–Pakistan strikes shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Hacked (Talk|Contribs)05:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You're invited to participate inThe World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦Dr. Blofeld21:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]