User talk:Aidillia
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This isAidillia'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives:1 |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
brachy08(chat here lol)05:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️10:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️10:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
SnowKang (talk)07:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.* Pppery *it has begun...05:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Nouera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)14:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.* Pppery *it has begun...01:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, as you did atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Bbb23 (talk)01:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Hammersoft (talk)03:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]Reminder to administrators: Edit restrictions placed by the community are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).
You were properly notified of yourWP:IBAN withUser:D.18th[1].WP:IBAN is clear; "make reference to or comment on Foo anywhere on Wikipedia, directly or indirectly". In this case, "Foo" isUser:D.18th. Yet, youchose to violate the IBAN anyway. Since you seem incapable of abiding by your IBAN, I have blocked you for1 week. You are on an extremely slippery slope. This is a very, very lenient block. There are admins who would block you indefinitely for the iban violations you have been committing. This ends. Now. If you want to be part of this community, you will strictly adhere to your IBAN. If you're not clear about what that means, then ASK QUESTION. Continuing as you have is completely unacceptable. --Hammersoft (talk)03:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use theUnblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Wow. Just wow. Aidillia, you had a window of opportunity in which to redeem yourself and you absolutely blew it. I said you were on an extremely slippery slope. Not only did you manage to slip further, you slipped as far as one can possibly fall by your own actions. What an absolutely silly move. Moving forward, you can try...as so many have done before you...to keep making sockpuppets while thinking we're too stupid to notice. Or, you could take a break for six months and attempt to come back as a productive member of this community. The former means wasting your time and ours. The latter means you might have a chance at redeeming yourself. I hope, for your sake, you are interested in the latter. If so,Wikipedia:Standard offer applies. --Hammersoft (talk)14:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've been blocked for so long. I often used the Aidillia account for editing. I usually wake up early to edit on English Wikipedia because it's my routine. I admit that I have many mistakes that need to be fixed. I've been waiting for 1 week to be unblocked, but then I was blocked as a sockpuppet by Izno, which makes me in shock. I don't know if using another device is a violation. It's my mistake for editing on another device, and, as I found out recently about it, I only just installed one script (1 edit). But isn't it too harsh to block it straight? I swear to never repeat the same mistake. I will try to read all of Wikipedia's policies and change myself to a better one. I know many people are not satisfied with my behavior. I was trying to change when I would be unblocked in 1 week, but suddenly I was blocked again, which disappointed me. Please consider it; my day without editing is just nothing. It's a fool of me to keep repeating the same mistake; I promise that I'll change. Much of my work on the draft is still ongoing there: Please consider unblocking me or at least changing the setting to block just for 1 week. I'm really begging.
Decline reason:
Absolutely not. Please follow the Standard Offer advice @Hammersoft gave you above.StarMississippi03:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidillia(talk)03:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let's lay this out;
In all that time you never once thought to look at the blocking policy (even though you were linked to it many times) and you want us to believe that? Not only that, but when you were blocked for edit warring on 23 January, you created a sockpuppet account[2]. Then, just four hours after your 5 February block you created another sockpuppet account[3]. So, according to you, in all this time that you had the opportunity to read our blocking policy you never thought to yourself "Gosh, I guess I'm blocked and shouldn't edit"? Instead, you want us to believe that you somehow thought that even though you've been blocked on this accountfour different times, it was somehow ok for you to use another account on another device? Wow. If you really think that, there is a seriouscompetence issue and you shouldn't be editing Wikipediaever. If, as seems more reasonable, you thought coming up with this excuse would fool us, there's still a seriouscompetence issue, and you're essentially insulting the collective intelligence of the people here. In either case, I now would not recommend an unblock in six months without a complete 180 degree turn around with clear demonstration of understanding of what you have done. Not that it would have made a difference given your sockpuppeting abuses, but I wish I had blocked you indefinitely before instead of just 1 week. You're just not understanding what it means to be a part of this community at all. I strongly recommend you stop placing unblock requests until August 2025 at the very, very minimum. In the meantime, if you create any more sockpuppet accounts what slim hope you have of ever coming back to this community will be shattered. --Hammersoft (talk)14:55, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:The Daechi Scandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)03:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:The Good Man (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)10:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
—👑PRINCE ofEREBOR📜15:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Kissing for Nothing!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)11:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Aidillia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Spring Fever (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)05:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I think it's time for me to be active here back? For that long time, I've realized my biggest mistake. I'm really sorry... that's the biggest lesson for me. I'll never do it again in the future. Please consider unblocking me. I will try my best to follow the guidelines here and be more extra careful:) I will improve my behavior.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read theguide to appealing blocks for more information.Yamla (talk)10:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm really sorry for my behavior before.
It's my mistake to create another account, as I wasn't aware that creating one using another device was a violation until I readWP:Sockpuppetry.. I created 2 account with 1 edit duringblocked for 1 week. That's the reason why ive been blocked right? I have 10 account that is abandoned and i don't misused it. I'm sorry if it's misunderstanding.
I'm also sorry for edit warring for uploading a file. All i do is just try to improve it. But I'm really sorry for warring; I will never do it again. I should just create a discussion on the talk page first if there's a problem. It's my mistake to not realize it earlier. If there's any problem, I should just ask for help instead of warring. I promise I will not continue to cause damage or disruption in this Wikipedia.
I promise to never repeat this mistake. I will make useful contributions instead in the future. Please consider unblocking me. I will try my best to follow the guidelines here and be more extra careful.
Decline reason:
Continued deception and "I will try my best" doesn't inspire confidenceA path to an unblock would have to includeat minimum' a one-account restriction.StarMississippi13:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidillia(talk)10:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It isnot the case that you only created two accounts. SeeCategory:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Aidillia. --Yamla (talk)11:30, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have ten account and some of it was abandoned. And i don't misused it as warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. As i read WP:Sockpuppetry, i can finally understand it. It's my biggest mistake to not know it before.
I will think deeply before doing something that can led to disruptive. If there's any problem, i will straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of guidelines here to avoid problems in the future.
I swear and promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future and respect each other. I will get rid of my problematic past behaviour, and be more responsibility in the future. I will improve myself and the way i speak.
Please consider unblocking me .
Decline reason:
Sorry Aidillia, I don't think you're ready to come back to editing yet. Have you considered editing on the Wikipedia in your native language? Having a history of good edits on another project would look good on you for the purposes of any future unblock requests.asilvering (talk)00:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To any administrator considering this unblock request; this is a checkuser block, and can not be removed or loosened without checkuser approval. SeeWP:CUBL. --Hammersoft (talk)16:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aidillia: - do you agree to use only one account from now on?PhilKnight (talk)16:34, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To user @Asilvering :You mean another language of Wikipedia?Aidillia(talk)01:07, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As suggested by @asilvering, i started editing everyday on the Indonesian Wikipedia only since 12 days ago and also Wikidata of Wikipedia. I used sandbox for testing, do some fixing, improving, and spend my time expanding some articles. I think i'm fully prepared to be here. I hope u guys can see my good contributions.
I have ten account and some of it was abandoned. And i don't misused it as warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault to not know it if it's violating.
I will think deeply before doing something that can led to disruptive. If there's any problem, i will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of guidelines here to avoid problems in the future.I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behaviour, and be more responsibility in the future.
Please consider unblocking me.. I will use this one account from now on.
Decline reason:
12 days is by far insufficient. Next reviewing admin might consider removing TPA.StarMississippi02:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aidillia(talk)02:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done tq for telling!Aidillia(talk)02:23, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As suggested by @asilvering, I started editing every day on theother language of Wikipedia since 33 days ago and also active on Wikidata. I'm fully prepared to be here. I hope you guys can see my good contributions there.
As I have created ten accounts before and some of them were abandoned, I don't misuse them for warring or vandalism. Two of them were created during the block for 1 week. My fault for not knowing if it's violating and doing 1 edit (installing a script).
I will think deeply before doing something that can lead to disruption. I will focus on quality edits. If there's any problem, I will just straightly go ask someone for help or open a discussion. I will read and follow some of the guidelines here to avoid problems in the future. I promise to never repeat this. I will be more careful in the future. I will get rid of my problematic past behavior and be more responsible in the future.
Please consider unblocking me.
Accept reason:
Welcome back, per below. Please be careful in future. I believe you still have active editing restrictions in place: do not violate those. And please,please do not create any further accounts. Any further abuse of multiple accounts will be looked upon very harshly.Toadspike[Talk]14:56, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aidillia(talk)00:12, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for the reminder.Toadspike[Talk]07:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
—👑PRINCE ofEREBOR📜12:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]