The User 84.69.68.199 has made incorrrect and unsubstantiated changes to the Des Kelly wiki page. This is not the first time User 84.69.68.199 has vandalised a wiki page as the list in the Talk section confirms. User 84.69.68.199 will be reported for these various incidents. Requests will be made to block the user from making any more disruptive edits. The false information will be reverted.

Hello, I'mJohnnie Bob. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person onRakhee Thakrar, but you didn't support your changes with acitation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerninghow we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you!Johnnie Bob (talk)15:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atJames Nesbitt. Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have been or will bereverted.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges. Thank you.ThaddeusSholto (talk)23:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atCarol Vorderman, you may beblocked from editing.ThaddeusSholto (talk)13:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atWilliam Thomas (actor).Belbury (talk)15:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of7 days forabuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk)22:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]